• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the government and the policy making process

Extracts from this document...


What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the government and the policy making process Before attempting to answer this increasingly relevant question in contemporary British politics, it is important to understand the structure of the parliamentary system, within which the machine of government operates. Parliament is known as a bi-cameral legislature whereby decision making autonomy resides with the lower house, The House of Commons, and the House of Lords exists as a check upon the powers exerted by respective governments through its debating and ratification functions. In theory, the bi-cameral legislature in the British political system exists to ensure that policy and legislation is created democratically and secondly to protect the country from autocracy or the emergence of dictatorships. Although it could be argued that both of these functions of parliament have been apparent in recent history, it is my aim in this essay is to investigate whether parliament still holds sufficient power in the uncodified British constitution to exist as a successful scrutinizer and check upon the government in power, and of the policy making process collectively. ...read more.


"The New British Politics" (I, Budge, I Crewe, D McKay, K Newton 1998) defines standing committees as: "Committees of the House of Commons that examine bills after their second reading in order to make them more acceptable for their third reading". The composition of standing committees is directly proportional to the distribution of seats in the House of Commons, therefore provided that the government has a positive parliamentary majority, they can expect to have majorities in each of the House of Commons standing committees. Therefore, similarly to debate and discussion in the House of Commons, standing committees provide a medium by which opposition MP's are able to scrutinize the legislative function of the government in parliament by actively partaking in the process of amending and creating legislation. However in reality, due to the stringent system of party whipping and strong party loyalties apparent in the contemporary British political system, it is almost certain that government MP's will follow the courses of action favored by their party, whether in standing committees, or similarly in votes on bills in the House of Commons, rather than risking harsh disciplinary action as is often the case when government MP's act against the wishes of their party. ...read more.


It is also apparent that the powers of parliament to scrutinize the government and the policy making process are unlikely to be realized under the current First Past the Post voting system which almost guarantees large parliamentary majorities for newly elected governments. Thus I believe it would be fair to say that under the current contemporary British political system, it is clear that parliament has insufficient powers to scrutinize the activities of government as well as the policy making process itself which is supported directly by the arguments and evidence I have presented in this essay. It could be argued that one way in which the abilities of parliament to scrutinize government and the policy making process could be widened, would be to alter the composition of both select and standing committees so that the government in power would not have a majority in each committee, and thus the activities of government could more easily brought to account. A further way of increasing the aforementioned powers of parliament could be to pass legislation to overturn the Official Secrets Act of 1989 and the culture of secrecy apparent in the contemporary British political system, forcing governments to disclose information on sensitive political issues to parliamentary committees, and bringing the activities of government to light more effectively. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. The Word 'Hacker' To the popular press, "hacker" means someone who breaks into ...

    They were mistaken. The next generation of business computer was being developed on entirely different lines by two long-haired guys called Steve in a garage in Los Altos. At about the same time, the powers that be were cooperating to develop the official next generation operating system, Multics.

  2. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    The Monarchy no longer had a financial hold over Parliament, meaning Government now had to be representative of the middle classes. No longer was the House of Commons only representative of the aristocrats who sat in the House of Lords.

  1. The Impact of Electoral Design on the Legislature.

    The voters elected representatives from both sides of the community in every constituency. Party List Systems For more information about the Closed Party List system: * A New Voting System: Electing the European Parliament How the System Works: There are many variations of party list voting, but the most basic form is the closed party list system.

  2. UK Written Constitutionshould the legislative process in Parliament be designed to secure that 'unconstitutional' ...

    a popular assembly.'12 Whilst elected representatives in Parliament do give it a democratic basis, academics have illustrated that democracy has a broader definition. Elliot identified that because 'the principle of democracy forms a key part of the normative foundation upon which Parliament's legislative authority is based'13, Parliament must adhere to democratic values.

  1. The Uk policy making process.

    Generally, Mr Blair would seize the chance to engage in some effective attack on the Conservative Government. On this particular, week however, he was conscious that a strong performance in the Commons could have the effect of pushing the Labour Party's manifesto from the lead story on that evening's news

  2. Assess the effectiveness of Parliaments Scrutiny of Government.

    The most important form on scrutiny of the work of the executive had always come from the investigative or select committees of the House of Commons. These were first established in the nineteenth century and have become a regular feature of parliamentary life since that time.

  1. 'The House of Commons most important function is to participate in the law making ...

    To these back-benchers, it is more important to help their own constituency than to make laws for other, generally more important, needs. Not only are the back-benchers sometimes selfish in their objectives, in some respects, but they are also easily influenced.

  2. How effective is Parliament in Controlling the Executive?

    Finally, living up to the predictable and scripted nature of Question Time, ministers may organise 'plants' in the Common's, i.e. MP's who will prompt announcements or the opportunity for self-congratulation. The House of Lords, like the House of Commons, makes Government ministers answer questions about their work.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work