• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the government and the policy making process

Extracts from this document...


What means are available to parliament and how effective is its scrutiny of the government and the policy making process Before attempting to answer this increasingly relevant question in contemporary British politics, it is important to understand the structure of the parliamentary system, within which the machine of government operates. Parliament is known as a bi-cameral legislature whereby decision making autonomy resides with the lower house, The House of Commons, and the House of Lords exists as a check upon the powers exerted by respective governments through its debating and ratification functions. In theory, the bi-cameral legislature in the British political system exists to ensure that policy and legislation is created democratically and secondly to protect the country from autocracy or the emergence of dictatorships. Although it could be argued that both of these functions of parliament have been apparent in recent history, it is my aim in this essay is to investigate whether parliament still holds sufficient power in the uncodified British constitution to exist as a successful scrutinizer and check upon the government in power, and of the policy making process collectively. ...read more.


"The New British Politics" (I, Budge, I Crewe, D McKay, K Newton 1998) defines standing committees as: "Committees of the House of Commons that examine bills after their second reading in order to make them more acceptable for their third reading". The composition of standing committees is directly proportional to the distribution of seats in the House of Commons, therefore provided that the government has a positive parliamentary majority, they can expect to have majorities in each of the House of Commons standing committees. Therefore, similarly to debate and discussion in the House of Commons, standing committees provide a medium by which opposition MP's are able to scrutinize the legislative function of the government in parliament by actively partaking in the process of amending and creating legislation. However in reality, due to the stringent system of party whipping and strong party loyalties apparent in the contemporary British political system, it is almost certain that government MP's will follow the courses of action favored by their party, whether in standing committees, or similarly in votes on bills in the House of Commons, rather than risking harsh disciplinary action as is often the case when government MP's act against the wishes of their party. ...read more.


It is also apparent that the powers of parliament to scrutinize the government and the policy making process are unlikely to be realized under the current First Past the Post voting system which almost guarantees large parliamentary majorities for newly elected governments. Thus I believe it would be fair to say that under the current contemporary British political system, it is clear that parliament has insufficient powers to scrutinize the activities of government as well as the policy making process itself which is supported directly by the arguments and evidence I have presented in this essay. It could be argued that one way in which the abilities of parliament to scrutinize government and the policy making process could be widened, would be to alter the composition of both select and standing committees so that the government in power would not have a majority in each committee, and thus the activities of government could more easily brought to account. A further way of increasing the aforementioned powers of parliament could be to pass legislation to overturn the Official Secrets Act of 1989 and the culture of secrecy apparent in the contemporary British political system, forcing governments to disclose information on sensitive political issues to parliamentary committees, and bringing the activities of government to light more effectively. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How effective is Parliament in holding the Government to account?

    They increased powers of select committees, so that they could see legislation before it was proposed, and in March 2002 there was a vote to see if Whips should have less power on who was on a select committees but this vote was defeated.

  2. Assess the effectiveness of Parliaments Scrutiny of Government.

    The most important form on scrutiny of the work of the executive had always come from the investigative or select committees of the House of Commons. These were first established in the nineteenth century and have become a regular feature of parliamentary life since that time.

  1. How effective is Parliament in Controlling the Executive?

    Committees are also put in a difficult position in that; they are likely to be ignored by the government when they divide on party lines, yet will be criticised when they are in consensus. Finally, committees often lack adequate research and administrative resources to make informed conclusions.

  2. There are many influences operating on parliament before and during the legislative process. Explain ...

    disabled people, homeless) and brings them together collectively involving them in the legislative process contributing to the democratic nature of it. Pressure groups also contribute their expert knowledge on specific issues when it comes to the consultation part of the legislative process, as they can give first hand information on the issue.

  1. "Debates, Question Time, and Select Committees all give Parliament Teeth." Do you agree?

    crucially it is the Whips who decide who joins which Committee, giving them the ability to stop potential trouble makers being able to scrutinise and hold the Government accountable very well. On top of this, although Committee Members have the right of the House of Commons to ask whatever questions

  2. Examine the significance of William Pitt, the younger's Government in reforming the British Parliamentary ...

    The king disagreed preventing him from carrying out his proposals. Pitt found himself redundant, and a new Government was formed. Pitt supported the new ministry and was invited by the new Prime Minister to join the Government in 1803. Pitt refused the offer, as he would return only as Prime Minister.

  1. Consider the contribution of select committees to the House of Commons' scrutiny of government ...

    The issue on the effectiveness of the select committee can be studied in "The Second Report from the Procedure Committee 1990", which simply assessed the first 10 years of the working of this system. It was submitted that the Select committee is a highly significant and not so much a total break with an evolutionary development albeit.

  2. A constitution is a set of laws, customs and conventions, which together defined the ...

    The House also gives "manifest legitimisation". This is the conscious giving of assent, not only encompassed by the giving of assent to bills, but also the continued support of the government. If the House loses confidence in the government, then by convention, the government will resign or call for dissolution of Parliament.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work