• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What pressure was exerted on South Africa by the International Community?

Extracts from this document...


What pressure was exerted on South Africa by the International Community? In 1948 Apartheid was set up in South Africa after the election of the National Party in 1948. At this time the leader of the Nationalists was a man named Dr Malan. The Nationalists believed, and called the blacks 'Bantu', they also did not distinguish between different tribes. Apathies stood for many many years, but the black majority were not at all happy with the new laws. For many many years the blacks rebelled and protested against the government, often with horrific consequences for those protesting. It just didn't seem to be working; the government did not seem to take any notice. That was until people started to take notice of what was happening, not only within South Africa but internationally people were realising what was really happening. But what did these internationals do, what pressure did they exert on South Africa. Some time in 1952 one of the most recognised powers in the world made a statement that totally changed the world and their feelings. ...read more.


These protests were anti-apartheid protests that once again helped to increase international awareness of South Africa and its evident problems. These protests of 1969 had implications and in 1970 pressure was put on the British government to cancel the South African Cricket tour. The pressure on the South African government was so clearly increasing and making things harder that ever for the Government and the man in power at the time, Dr Vewoerd. During the early 1970's yet more and more international countries were taking notice of the goings on. Throughout this time many brits and Americans actually boycotted buying fruit or any other product of South Africa as it was seen as a way for their government to take notice and sort it out. Other boycotts were set up to cause as much disruption as possible to the economic state of a country that so many were worried about. There was another boycott in 1973 of Barclays bank and many other banks that were lending money to South Africa to help them economically. The idea being that if South Africa had no money coming in, but money going out then soon they would come into serious problems and have to get rid of apartheid, as this would have been the reason for the boycotts. ...read more.


The main problem being that this pressure was not really caused by the governments of these international countries but instead from the people of these powers. Like the British people that worried enough about the apartheid that they boycotted various produce and banks and even protested enough to seriously disrupt the sporting sides of their own nation and the visitors, South Africa. The only real power that seemed to intervene, and not surprisingly, was the UN who mad various statements and orders saying that Apartheid was bad, and to get rid of it. These orders and pressure were obviously not significant enough to make a real impact on it as it did not make terrible difference but instead cause the international people to sit up and take notice, thus causing the boycotts and protests. Although there was some pressure put upon South Africa this was by no means enough to make any real difference to the situation inside the boarders. There should have been considerably more pressure from the governments of opposing countries, not just the people, there is a limit to the power of the people but the governments could have made a considerable difference, but they chose not to. Steve Fuller 6/3/02 10BL Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    South Africa and the rest of the world had very different opinions on how blacks should be treated. South Africa believed that the whites were far superior to the blacks. The rest of the world disagreed, they believed in equal opportunities for everyone but in the end only a few

  2. The ending of white minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    Also, the sanctions punished blacks before whites. South Africa's bounty of natural resources made the success of sanctions that much harder. Ergo, sanctions were not the biggest factor in ending apartheid. The ending of white minority rule could also be put down to the individuals who also worked to try to end apartheid.

  1. Assess the Extent to which the Different Powers Prepared 'Their' African Colonies for Independence.

    However they were not going to be successful at all. In the Belgian Congo the first moves towards independence were made from inside Belgium with a plan for 'emancipation' to be unveiled over a period of thirty years. A committee recommended an elaborate pyramid of representative Councils, with complex systems of indirect election to neutralise the hazards of Manhood suffrage10.

  2. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    Despite these similarities there are significant differences in the recent political histories of the two countries. It is useful to split up the recent political history of South Africa and Namibia into two phases. The first phase will be between 1970 leading up to 1990.

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 - "The End Of Apartheid".

    Although the black violence seemed to be working, there were many problems between the black groups which needed to be solved before they could get it completely abolished. This involved fighting between the UDF/ANC and Inkatha and also in Soweto in 1985, supporters of the ANC were ready to fight supporters of AZAPO.

  2. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    Verwoerd made this law more racist by essentially excluding any non-White from being allowed to live in established towns or to live and work in any established economically viable areas all of which were proclaimed to be White areas. It caused many non-Whites to have to commute large distances from their homes in order to be able to work.

  1. How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa ...

    Before the 1994 elections many white South Africans were against giving up the white majority rule. This was mainly because whites were scared blacks would take revenge on them for all the years of hardship they'd been through under apartheid.

  2. An historical study of apartheid in South Africa.

    A statement made by J.H. Hofmeyr, who was a member of a minority party in parliament explained the fear of black domination. "It is a perfectly natural fear...,fear of the White man being drowned in a Black ocean, and we have all got that fear of race mixture and miscegenation..."(Sorrenson, 1976, p33)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work