• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What pressure was exerted on South Africa by the International Community?

Extracts from this document...


What pressure was exerted on South Africa by the International Community? In 1948 Apartheid was set up in South Africa after the election of the National Party in 1948. At this time the leader of the Nationalists was a man named Dr Malan. The Nationalists believed, and called the blacks 'Bantu', they also did not distinguish between different tribes. Apathies stood for many many years, but the black majority were not at all happy with the new laws. For many many years the blacks rebelled and protested against the government, often with horrific consequences for those protesting. It just didn't seem to be working; the government did not seem to take any notice. That was until people started to take notice of what was happening, not only within South Africa but internationally people were realising what was really happening. But what did these internationals do, what pressure did they exert on South Africa. Some time in 1952 one of the most recognised powers in the world made a statement that totally changed the world and their feelings. ...read more.


These protests were anti-apartheid protests that once again helped to increase international awareness of South Africa and its evident problems. These protests of 1969 had implications and in 1970 pressure was put on the British government to cancel the South African Cricket tour. The pressure on the South African government was so clearly increasing and making things harder that ever for the Government and the man in power at the time, Dr Vewoerd. During the early 1970's yet more and more international countries were taking notice of the goings on. Throughout this time many brits and Americans actually boycotted buying fruit or any other product of South Africa as it was seen as a way for their government to take notice and sort it out. Other boycotts were set up to cause as much disruption as possible to the economic state of a country that so many were worried about. There was another boycott in 1973 of Barclays bank and many other banks that were lending money to South Africa to help them economically. The idea being that if South Africa had no money coming in, but money going out then soon they would come into serious problems and have to get rid of apartheid, as this would have been the reason for the boycotts. ...read more.


The main problem being that this pressure was not really caused by the governments of these international countries but instead from the people of these powers. Like the British people that worried enough about the apartheid that they boycotted various produce and banks and even protested enough to seriously disrupt the sporting sides of their own nation and the visitors, South Africa. The only real power that seemed to intervene, and not surprisingly, was the UN who mad various statements and orders saying that Apartheid was bad, and to get rid of it. These orders and pressure were obviously not significant enough to make a real impact on it as it did not make terrible difference but instead cause the international people to sit up and take notice, thus causing the boycotts and protests. Although there was some pressure put upon South Africa this was by no means enough to make any real difference to the situation inside the boarders. There should have been considerably more pressure from the governments of opposing countries, not just the people, there is a limit to the power of the people but the governments could have made a considerable difference, but they chose not to. Steve Fuller 6/3/02 10BL Page 1 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. How important was the opposition of other countries in bringing apartheid in South Africa ...

    This was all a result of the township riots. This was another short term cause for the collapse of apartheid. The ANC had been around for all of the Nationalists power and had been one of the main reasons for the collapse of Apartheid. Despite the ANC being banned since the Sharpeville shootings in 1969, the ANC had remained strong in other countries and in hiding.

  2. The ending of white minority rule in South Africa was achieved only because of ...

    For example, F.W. de Klerk played a crucial role in dismantling the framework of apartheid. De Klerk became president on the 20th September 1989, and on the 2nd February 1990, he made a 35 minute speech that practically saw the end of apartheid.

  1. South Africa 1945-1994 The end of Apartheid.

    It was in fact because South Africa was seen as a risky nation to invest in. The withdrawal of funds had an immediate effect. The South African government was forced to declare bankruptcy. The countries debts were also rescheduled causing South Africa to be ignored economically, financially and diplomatically.

  2. In what ways were the lives of South Africans changed by the policy of ...

    because Kgnosa was a leader of the ANC and everybody thought that he was going to get freedom for the Blacks until he 'mysteriously' died in prison. This continued to realize the aims of the white minority to suppress the black majority population.

  1. An historical study of apartheid in South Africa.

    Under the apartheid system, hundreds of repressive laws and regulations determined where the racial groups may live, work, own land, where and who they can go to school with, where they could seek entertainment and even whom they could or could not marry.

  2. Assess the Extent to which the Different Powers Prepared 'Their' African Colonies for Independence.

    To say that this is true of all British ex-colonies would be a lie. One of its better post colonial successes would be that of Botswana. The reasons behind this can be easily explained. During colonial times the effect of British imperialism was minimal and did not destroy inclusive pre-colonial institutions.

  1. Comparative Analysis: The churches and their affect on society and politics in the cases ...

    Both countries have experienced a certain wealth of ecumenism, often at critical times. However, the array of different denominations and sub-denominations - that have some quite fundamental differences between them - often hampered efforts for the churches to work in unison.

  2. Since its formation in 1949 Communist China has been criticised for its record on ...

    Landlords were incarcerated or killed their land and possessions were shared out to the peasants, in one of Mao's schemes. The landlords were treated like criminals but they had not committed any crime. Mao also introduced the "let a hundred flowers bloom" campaign where intellectuals were invited to offer constructive criticisms about him and the things that he had done.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work