• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What was the post war 'consensus'?

Extracts from this document...


What was the post war 'consensus'? The following years after the World War Two were known as 'post war consensus years'. The consensus was the agreement between the two biggest political parties at the time; the Labour party and the Conservative party. The term was used to describe the 'social-democratic' supremacy that was happening in Britain between the years of 1945 until the late 1970's. Over the years it was seen as a time for great political unity and prosperity following the tragic events of World War Two and also a time for both parties to contribute themselves into combining policies which would be similar in ideology in both the social and economic fields respectively. Despite the fact that at some points both parties disagreed on certain issues but in the long term it would become a strong basis for the British political agenda for almost a very long forty years. In 1945, the Labour party claimed victory in the general elections to lead the British government. ...read more.


Many critics have often argued that Atlee was not overly Socialist at first but was under great influence of the great economist John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946). Keynes believed very much in the expansion of the welfare state. He also believed of a 'state financed system of social security accessible to all citizens and state responsibility for the growing economy.' Not only this but he also thought that the 'government should be more active in introducing regulations and controls aimed at influencing prices and wages, rather than just implementing economic policy in an attempt to prevent recession.' Not everybody agreed with Keynes theories and certain divisions were made between parties at the time too. The successes of the consensus meant that both parties' ideas were almost identical but then again still there were differences. As much as Atlee did for the British government during the consensus years Hugh Gaitskell replaced him in 1955 who would now run the labour party. Gaitskell was different to Atlee in many ways, he also believed in the welfare state and most labour ideology but worked more effectively than his previous successor. ...read more.


In conclusion, the consensus years has been approached differently by many critics in different manners. There are those who say it existed and those who say it did not and that the earlier governments only acted out of pity and consciousness for the people at the time. However, had it not happened then the establishment of the National Health Service would not have been done, nationalisations of companies would not have occurred. Living standards would not have increased either, the general public were living with much ease compared to those years when the depression was at its worst and it was in 1951 that Prime minister Macmillan made his famous speech of 'most of our people had ever had it so good.' Political writers like Peter Hennessy have often argued that 'consensus' is too strong a word to use during that particular era and what it implied was 'social harmony and an absence of conflict' between the major parties and was more in favour of using 'post war settlement' as a result of deferring political views. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What Are The Key Elements Of Thatcherism? To What Extent Was It A Reaction ...

    First she had an unusually decisive and confrontational style and a forceful personality. She was also an activist in her cabinet, with the number of both cabinet meetings and committees falling dramatically during her 'reign'. She often pushed other cabinet members into her way of thinking.

  2. Why Did the Post-war Consensus Breakdown?

    The Labour government probed incapable of managing these crises and this provided the contact in which a (New Right) alternative to the post-war consensus could begin to appear attractive to the electorate. The so-called 'winter of discontent' in 1979 was used to justify Thatcher's attacks on the post-war consensus.

  1. To what extent was there a 'post war consensus' between 1945-1970.

    Most of these industries already had a history of government involvement and required huge resources for investment and modernisation. Many private owners did not have the finance necessary for the improvements and were offered generous compensation payments, which allowed the nationalisation programme to be implemented without too much controversy.

  2. What led to the breakdown of the post war political consensus?

    Despite the ongoing international crisis with the oil prices, Britain's unemployment levels were increasing and inflation was increasing too, this came to be known as stagflation. It was because of the international recession that Britain was forced into a three-day week and also because the number of worker strikes were attacking the economy very badly.

  1. What did the post-war consensus in British politics amount to? Why did it ...

    delay or water down those directives which they thought went too far. It is obvious that the consensus could not endure indefinitely. There were only so many cracks that could be papered over, the party faithful could only be betrayed a limited number of times.


    e From 1 to 2, will improve the corruption index bye the order of 2 point on the Transparency International (T.I) index. By acknowledging the existence of more indirect effects, the impact might be even larger, yet the authors are very careful in addressing the problem of causality corrupt countries

  1. Is Legalization a Realistic Alternative to the War on Marijuana?

    it will surely destroy us" (Gary 81). It was this simple misnomer about marijuana that perpetuated three decades of wasteful, outlandish spending. Moreover, at the current rate of spending, this expense will likely double in the next ten years. Torr states that an average of fifteen billion dollars is spent each year on intelligence and operations (105).

  2. How many forms of 'Conservatism' are observable between 1945-1980?

    Macmillan summed up the Conservative Party's conscience about working people: 'We must remember that the men from Stockton [his own constituency] and the Yorkshire coalfields had fought and died at Ypres and Passchendaele...No one. And indeed no organization of our people must be rushed.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work