• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11

Why Did Revolutions Break Out so Widely Across Europe in 1848 and Why Did They Fail?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why Did Revolutions Break Out so Widely Across Europe in 1848 and Why Did They Fail? The revolutions of 1848 were born from the legacy of peasant grievances and the appalling conditions of the urban working classes, honed to a peak by the agricultural and financial crises of the two previous years. At the same time, the liberal and inexperienced middle-classes all over Europe saw this as their opportunity to gain more political power. The sheer variety of short-term triggers: the collapse of the French stock market, and the resignation of Metternich on 13 March, begins to explain the failure of these uprisings. These different reasons illustrate the divisions between groups that meant that none could fulfil its aims; the Bourgeoisie were too small a group to gain their political concessions, while the workers lacked a true leader to deliver them better conditions. In the end, as the rebellions got out of control, it was the middle classes that came down on the side of order and helped to quell them, while internationally Britain and Russia flexed the muscles of the ancien r�gime. The Industrial Revolution, which had begun late in the previous century, had caused massive social and demographic change. By 1846, the population of Paris had reached 1, 053, 9001, almost double her figure for fifty years earlier. Rapid urbanisation was a symptom of this social change with its creation of a new urban working class, but also one of the causes of their hardship. ...read more.

Middle

Despite the widespread similarity of conditions and long-term motivations across Europe, the short-term triggers for revolution were somewhat localised. In France, the banning of a protest banquet in Paris brought crowds onto the streets on 22 February, who were fired upon by troops; by the next morning 1500 barricades had been set up in the streets of Paris in protest. The news of the February Revolution in France helped to initiate the proceedings in northern Italy, Vienna and Budapest both because it illuminated the possibility of revolt to others and because France was now too tied up internally to suppress rebellion elsewhere: "the crowing of the Gallic cock will once more awaken Europe"4. By far the most vital short-term trigger in Italy and Austria was the fall of Metternich on 13 March, since he was the living symbol of oppressive rule in these states, but the Italians also looked to the successful Swiss Civil War against Austrian rule in 1847 for inspiration. Revolutions broke out so widely in Europe in 1848 because working class hardship after the Industrial Revolution, agricultural discontent and ideological change had been flourishing in all of its states. The crises of 1846-7 in terms of food and finances affected all of them, through trade if not directly, and once one state had gone into revolution, the peoples of others recognised an opportunity to express their troubles or force political change upon their nations. ...read more.

Conclusion

While revolutionaries had successfully overthrown the existing regimes in the European states, where they failed was, with the exception of France, in not getting the army on their side, or providing their own organised force for protection. The power vacuum left by the resignation of Metternich on 13 March could not be filled by spontaneous revolutionaries with no clear leaders and a huge range of objectives. As soon as General Widishgr�tz began to bombard Prague with the Imperial Army, it had fallen to him within three days, while Radetzky crushed the entire Piedmontese army at the battle of Custozza over just four days (23-27 July). A revolution whose causes split the insurgents so divisively could never work without the leadership of men who could successfully draw some of these forces together, and a collaboration and compromise between social classes. No such selflessness ever developed in 1848, each group or individual like Charles Albert, King of Piedmont, was simply out to fulfil his personal aims, so that when the rebellions became too violent and radical the middle classes, thinking of their own socio-economic well-being, gravitated to the side of order and suppressed them. The intervention of Britain and Russia and the defeat of Italian and Austrian rebels by the Habsburg armies showed that only one set of forces were united and determined enough to make a difference, those of the ancien r�gime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. British History Coursework: The Irish Famine 1845-1849

    applied solely as a means of adding comforts of the lower classes...instead of being used, as intended as provision for the utterly destitute, and for the purpose of warding off absolute starvation...The commissioners cannot but complain of finding the demands for rations from many districts continually increasing, and sometimes largely, without even a word of explanation to account for it."

  2. Karl Marx

    Marx traced the history of the various modes of production and predicted the collapse of the present one -- industrial capitalism -- and its replacement by communism. Marx's major work on political economy made slow progress. By 1857 he had produced a gigantic 800 page manuscript on capital, landed property, wage labor, the state, foreign trade and the world market.

  1. jeffersonian republicanism

    The Republicans abolished the ostracized Naturalisation Act of 1798 and allowed The Alien and Sedation Acts to expire whilst giving pardon to those still in jails for violating them. Not only did they also abolish the detested Whiskey Excise but the whole Federalist system of internal taxation.

  2. What was Chartism and why did it fail

    all the Irish Charm and wit as Edward Royle described him as living 'closer to their hearts' (of chartists) when compared to Lovett. Anthony wood prefers the manner of Lovett and says that he 'emerges as the most prophetic figure in the chartist movement'.

  1. The causes and the political and social consequences of the Dreyfus Affair in France

    There were no concessions on either side. Once the threat that arose from the Affair was removed, the catholic awakening confronted the republican anticlericalism with all its force. This shock crossed the history of modern France. Later, under Vichy, when the Nationalists of the Right finally achieved power, enthusiastically implementing

  2. How far is it true to say that 'having made Italy', Italian governments were ...

    Repression such as this was common from about 1896-1914 with many demonstrators killed and censorship increased, so it is fairly unsurprising that this vicious circle of citizen rebellion and increased government control led to lack of respect from both sides.

  1. During the year of 1848, a revolutionary tide broke out in Europe. Revolutions ...

    People wanted to identify their language, culture, traditions and their country. "Nationalists sought to promote the national culture, defined primarily in terms of language and historical heritage, and to equate political structure with the culture."2 Countries such as Germany and Italy were seeking one big united country instead of having different parts of states.

  2. The debate over immigration and French identity is one of the most controversial questions ...

    it seems to be more related to the firts type of racism, although it was based on cultural and religious grounds rather than on ethnicity. It was common for anti-semitist to cover up their hathred using old arguements such as economic concurrence, their alliance with syndicats, france-maconerie, the left and

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work