• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did social policy questions come to dominate British politics in the decade before the First World War?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Tony Marsden - Somerville College - PPE BPG Why did social policy questions come to dominate British politics in the decade before the First World War? Toward the end of the Victorian age, Britain underwent rapid reform in many political areas. Disraeli and Gladstone were the notable two who had enacted changes to both domestic and foreign policy and altered British politics irrevocably. In spite of this, there was a perceived decline in traditional industry, agriculture and influence abroad throughout and following the last twenty years of Victoria's life. In 1904, the Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration found that Britain's growing urban population was living in increased squalor, and this brought to light a reality that shocked a great many voters and policymakers. At the beginning of the Edwardian period, the political landscape was dominated by matters of social policy and the object of this essay is to determine why social policy, above all other policy areas, was so prominent at this time. Before this is possible, however, it is necessary to look at what those social policy questions were, and how their debates progressed. The first area of social policy to be discussed is that of tariff reform. ...read more.

Middle

Aside from tariff reform, which has already been outlined, there were few radical solutions proposed until David Lloyd George's budget of 1909. In this budget, Lloyd George proposed legislation to pave the way for land taxes. Although the budget did not enact the taxes immediately, it proposed an evaluation of all land to the end that it should later come to be taxed according to its value. At the same time, the budget was to introduce state pensions. The 1909 budget was a key contribution to questions of social policy not just in the pre-WW1 years, but well beyond that. Firstly, it set in motion the radical motions toward a welfare state with a graduated redistributive tax to be placed on land. Secondly, it gave individuals beyond working age the right to income from the state. Thirdly, it set back the protectionist debate by showing that social reforms were possible under free trade. Lastly, it secured strong Labour loyalty when it became apparent that the budget was to result in a standoff with the Lords. These four facts were significant in reshaping the way British politics was to deal with social policy. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were, for example, over 2,500 school boards in the country each with insufficient power to operate effectively. It was characteristic of National Efficiency thinking that governments should begin to operate with less involvement of full Cabinet, and greater use of Cabinet committees in order to bypass the quarrelsome and delaying executive body. By doing this, the overbearing desire for social debate was able to overcome the agenda and gain momentum. The legacy of Gladstone and the Irish question would appear also to have had some influence on the Edwardian agenda. By the 1890s, the Liberals had managed to alienate middle class support by being the party largely seen as the advocates of Home Rule and little else. In this way, the party's support came from little more than those wishing to protest and those going with the fad. It was well apparent to the Liberals and the country by the mid 1890s that Home Rule was a hopeless Gladstonian archaism which had to be forgotten, mainly because it would never pass through the Lords. So, by shaking off the shadow of Home Rule, and then later their awkward differences over the Boer War, the Liberals were able to unite under Asquith and take issue with the Conservatives over matters they had longed to contest for some time. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. "The first World War killed the Liberal Party" how far do you agree with ...

    This alone suggests the First World War did not kill the Liberal Party but infact the period before it did. Indeed problems such as the suffragette movement, Irish Home Rule and Industrial unrest also raised at this time. The evidence to support Dangerfield's theory however, is not strong.

  2. Assess the Impact of the First World War on British Politics by 1918.

    This feud divided and destroyed the Liberal party and they would never recover from it. It showed the Liberals to be incompetent and proved that they could not handle government politics at the highest level. The war caused the split in the party, meaning it ultimately caused its death or at the very least speeded up its decay.

  1. How much did Disraeli contribute to British Imperialism and do you think Gladstone was ...

    The acquisition of Cyprus in 1878, following the Congress of Berlin was presented by Disraeli as another success, another example of securing the route to India, whilst Gladstone saw it as an illustration of a flawed policy, stating that this link had no historical or cultural basis, and that the relationship would be one of subordination and suppression.

  2. Free essay

    Consider the view that the liberal government reforms 1906-1914 were more concerned with the ...

    The growing pressure of the labour party was the main reason for the act. The liberals had to try and maintain balance and were able to justify their decisions to more individualist members of the party by reasons of political pragmatism, they did not to any extent, want to witness the labour party grow a political advantage over them.

  1. A Detail on the British Empire Between the Great Wars, from 1918 to 1939.

    In this crisis Neville Chamberlain resigns, and Winston Churchill takes over. Despite what may seem as numerous changes in government and political alliances, the main picture in Britain remained fairly unchanging and constant: the common British man (or woman) was extremely conservative in his political ideals, and this is reflected

  2. How significant was The First World War in the Labour Party's rise to second-party ...

    Michael Hart elaborates on this in his article "the Liberals, the War and the franchise" where he points out that areas of "low enfranchisement" before 1918, such as Birkenhead, Manchester, Cardiff and Swansea, still remained Liberal Majorities after 1918. So what else allowed the Labour Party to consolidate itself as the new opposition?

  1. Liberal Party Decline - Was it due to the First World War?

    The Liberals were only able to remain in power with the support of Labour and the Irish Nationalists. Although the statistics suggest the Liberals were damaged severely by the constitutional crisis of 1909-1911, Dangerfield overlooks their successes that resulted from the crisis.

  2. The Negative Impact Of World War 1 On Italy: Weaknesses Of The Liberal State, ...

    The reasons for this chaotic situation are outlined below. Government 1919-1921: Unstable, short-lived coalitions that appeared weak, unable to maintain law and order or deal with the country's problems Although Fascism did badly at the elections of November 1919 the results were even more damaging for the Liberals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work