• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why does the Chinese Government at the start of the 21st Century refuse to give its people democratic rights, despite encouraging private enterprise in industry, commerce & agriculture and how do you see this situation developing in the next few years?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why does the Chinese Government at the start of the 21st Century refuse to give its people democratic rights, despite encouraging private enterprise in industry, commerce & agriculture and how do you see this situation developing in the next few years? China in the past few years has faced growing problems regarding its expanding economy. The Chinese government have begun to reform China huge economy, however even these small reforms have begun to contradict the Marxist principals which the Chinese Communist Party placed so highly. The encouraging of private enterprise and free markets, have given birth to China's first millionaires, so in a country that principals state everyone is equal, how is it that some Chinese appear more equal than others? And will China continue its reform in both economical and political terms, and evolve into a democracy like Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong, or will the Chinese Communist Party attempt to keep a strict political reign even with the intrusion of television and the Internet. There were and still are clear needs for economic change. Mao Zedong's huge projects almost crippled China's economy; the production of useless steel and the neglect of crops caused huge famines and place many Chinese people in serve poverty. ...read more.

Middle

Mao's charisma helped resort Chinese faith in authoritarian rule after the corruption of past years and democracy. His successor Deng also greatly improved Chinese life, he allowed for private enterprise and special economic zones to be set up. Maybe the single most important reason why democracy has not been introduced to Chinese people is because the average peasant simply does not want democracy, he is happy with his improved life under Deng, and fears the chaos which could take place were China to follow Russia's example of becoming a democracy. Nevertheless there have been resistance to the Chinese Communist Party; Tiananmen Square and Democracy Wall are a classic examples of resistance to the Communist ways, and how Communism dealt with protestors. Despite Deng's economic reforms he stands firm on the one party system run in China. In 1979 After Mao Zedong's death people began to openly debate the political future of China, Democracy Wall formed where bold writers expressed their wishes for freedom and democracy. Deng quickly clamped down on this. Closing the wall to everyone and imprisoning the main writers. The Tiananmen Square massacre was possibly the most famous clamp down on political protests. Deng forcefully used the People Liberation Army to drive the students out of the square killing many as they went. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Iron Rice Bowl will be gone. However the free market system would entice many big businesses not already established in China to enter her markets, creating new and well paid jobs. This isn't a permanent solution however, the Chinese Communist party will find it very difficult to remain popular and with the foreign influence of TV and the Internet, the reminders of democracy will be all to clear, it would only be a matter of time before further protests will occur, and another Tiananmen Square like incidence would create world-wide public outrage. I doubt with the following pressure China would be able to keep its Communist government. So that would make some sort of change inevitable. There highly improbable solution is to revert to Mao Zedong's pure Communist way, have everyone work for each other again, but I doubt any Chinese person would want to return to that after the entices of the big "capitalist" cities. So there remains only one viable option for China to turn in a democratic country. But this too carries risks, will corruption once again work its way into the political parties? Will China's economy collapse like the Russian's? Will people actually turn out and vote of elections? especially the rural dwellers who seem to care little about the political struggles which seem so far away. The only way these questions will be answered is if China changes. Only then will what is right for China be apparent. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Politics essays

  1. What impact did Mao have on the lives of the Chinese people from 1949 ...

    There was a farming crisis in China between 1959 and 1961, which resulted in a serious famine. Party leaders covered this up, but an estimated 30 million people died of starvation. So, in 1960 when Mao had been removed as head of state, communes were reduced in size, which made them easier to manage.

  2. Malta at the turn of the 19th Century.

    At that time the Order of St. John had some lands in the Polish territory that was subdivided between Prussia, Austria and Russia. However the lands that the Order had were part of Russia hence it tries to maintain good relations with Russia and safeguard their lands, property and income from Russia.

  1. Economic Changes after the 1949 Communist Revolution in China

    first, the communes were organised so that nothing could distract people from their work. Around 4 million communal eating halls were set up so that the number of people who spent time cooking food was reduced. Several million children were put in nurseries and schools so that both parents in a family were freed for full-time work.

  2. Tiananmen Square

    This was then followed by a hunger strike including several hundred to a thousand people and on May 30th a statue of the 'Goddess of Democracy' was erected in the square. This statue then came to symbolize the protest to the television viewers worldwide that were being fed by the

  1. Describe the weaknesses of the Democratic Government in Italy in the years 1919-1922

    Workers were striking, occupying factories and ousting the owners. The militia that had come back from the war expecting to be heroes, instead found themselves unemployed and disrespected. They actually missed the war, and the camaraderie that they had experienced, the Arditi in particular felt like this. They no longer had a place in society and this made them bitter towards the government.

  2. Zimbabwe is one country in which even after independence, the situation has not changed.

    In 1965, Smith declared Rhodesia as an independent, white-led republic without British consent. This garnered widespread criticism and Ian Smith's government was not recognized by other international governments. Frequent violent protests by ZANU under Mugabe, who was now a famous and respected politician, and condemnations from foreign governments, forced Smith to revert from his stance.

  1. Minority Rights, Identity Politics and Gender in Bangladesh: Current Problems and Issues

    Ironically madrassas and village Imams have been considered likely catalysts for development in the rural areas. UNDP and UNESCO had programs for training Imams of mosques to engage in pro-development activities such as population planning etc.

  2. COMBATING CORRUPTION IN BANGLADESH: SOME STRATEGIES

    either in conspicuous consumption or transferred to foreign bank accounts; generates allocative inefficiency by permitting the least efficient contractor or most costly supplier with the highest ability to bribe; bribes and payoffs instead of expediting decisions and facilitating movement of files encourages civil servants to hold back all papers until

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work