• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Abortion - The pro-life argument.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

According to Dean Stretton, "The most plausible pro-life argument claims that abortion is seriously wrong because it deprives the foetus of something valuable. This paper examines two recent versions of this argument. Don Marquis's version takes the valuable thing to be a 'future like ours', a future containing valuable experiences and activities. Jim Stone's version takes the valuable thing to be a future containing conscious goods which it is the foetus's biological nature to make itself have. I give three grounds for rejecting these arguments. First, they lead to unacceptable inequalities in the wrongness of killing. Second, they lead to counterintuitive results in a range of imaginary cases. Third, they ignore the role of psychological connectedness in determining the magnitude or seriousness of deprivation-based harms: because the foetus is only weakly psychologically connected to its own future, it cannot be seriously harmed by being deprived of that future". Everyday there are pregnant mothers who abuse drugs and alcohol totally ignoring the living, growing person inside them. ...read more.

Middle

To me, this is child abuse of the worst kind. An unborn child is getting abused with drugs, alcohol, or whatever the mother may be ingesting, and the child is unable to defend itself. If the child was born it could call someone for help, but an unborn child cannot speak and therefore needs someone to speak for it in case of any danger that might come to it. Our unborn children should have the same rights as any living person. In our society we give rights to any living creature, human or not human. Is it right that we give more rights to animals than we do our own unborn? The best legal argument against abortion can be seen in the case of Roe v. Wade. It violated standard legal reasoning. The Supreme Court decided not to decide when life begins and then turned around and overturned the laws of 50 different states. Most of the Supreme Court's verdict rested upon two sentences. ...read more.

Conclusion

Even more curious was the fact that to do so, it had to ignore the religious community and international community on the subject of the unborn. Had the religious community really failed to reach a consensus? Although there were some intramural disagreements, certainly the weight of evidence indicated that a Western culture founded on Judeo-Christian values held abortion to be morally wrong. People with widely divergent theological perspectives (Jewish, Catholic, evangelical and fundamental Protestants) shared a common agreement about the humanity of the unborn. The same could be said about the international legal community. Physicians around the world subscribed to the Hippocratic Oath ("I will not give a woman a pessary to produce abortion"). The unborn were protected by various international documents like the Declaration of Geneva and the U.N. Declaration of the Rights of the Child. Just as there are solid medical arguments against abortion, so also there are legal arguments against abortion. Roe vs. Wade was a bad decision that needs to be overturned. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Abortion and other medical issues section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Abortion and other medical issues essays

  1. Abortion Position Paper

    However, the most common reason women receive abortions is because they are just not ready for the responsibility of having a child. The pro-choice crowd finds it acceptable to have an abortion for no reason than a woman is not ready for children.

  2. Abortion: Pro- Life or Pro- Choice?

    In times like this, questions arise to the couple or to the mother herself such as, "How can I adequately take care of this child?" In situations where the child is not wanted, other questions are raised, such as, "Is it fair to bring unwanted children into the world?"

  1. Abortion arguments and powerful images

    Generally the whole of the Christian religion is against abortion. However, each denomination has a different view on abortion. The views and allowances of each denomination slightly differ. The Roman Catholic Church has the strongest objection to abortion and believes abortions are always wrong at whatever stage of development and in whatever situation.

  2. Pro-Choice is Pro-Life.

    The procedure involves pulling the fetus from the womb, except for the head, which is too large to pass without injuring the woman. The head is then collapsed to allow removal. The procedure is designed specifically to ensure the maximum protection of the woman.

  1. Decisions on life and living.

    if the mother was raped; this is one circumstance when some Christians would regard the termination as acceptable. If a woman has been raped and becomes pregnant there is a very high chance that abortion will seem like the only way.

  2. A Defense of Abortion.

    As Kant suggests, if you act according to your duty, you will be acting morally. Therefore, when you look after your child you are doing the right thing. Remember the distinction between good and right is huge. Doing the right thing might cause bad things, or vice versa.

  1. Decisions on Life and Living

    and passing with him through the experience of bodily death in order to be resurrected in God's Kingdom and should therefore celebrate the end of life. Responsibility for those at the end of life is as significant as responsibility for those at the beginning of life.

  2. Challenges to Roe v. Wade - women's right to privacy?

    Connecticut (1965), where the Court held that the right to privacy is constitutional, derived from the penumbras and emanations of the Bill of Rights (Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965). Consequently, The Court annulled a Connecticut statute that restricted married couples from using of birth control, arguing that the right to marital privacy guarantees married couples' access to contraceptives.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work