• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are all human actions motivated by self-interest?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are all human actions motivated by self-interest? The idea that all human actions are motivated by self-interest alone is known as the doctrine of Egoism. Egoism maintains that a person's only obligation is to themselves, and that each person should act in such a way that will maximize their own long-term well being. They have a duty to serve their self-interest. A person should only ever act in a given situation, iff1 it promotes their long-term self-interest. Egoism therefore holds that because a person should act only if it benefits them, and should therefore refrain from action when the act produces no benefits for them, and that therefore it is morally permissible for a person to allow harm to others in such situations. The important thing to remember about egoism, is that the egoist must act in accordance with his or her long-term self-interest. An egoist is therefore not just somebody who believes that you should always do what you like when you like, because acting in accordance with this maxim would not necessarily benefit a person in the long-term. To explain this point in greater clarity, we will take the example of Epicurus. Epicurus was a hedonist, meaning that he believed that pleasure was the only thing which was worth seeking. However, he did not devote his life to indulgence and excess, in fact he believed that long-term pleasure could only be achieved through philosophy and art, with a virtual absence of physical pleasures. Being free from worry and distress. ...read more.

Middle

Of course, although this is seen as one of the most damning of the criticisms, I personally believe it to be unfair. We cannot place our trust in science, but decide to disregard this theory on such grounds. If anybody truly believes that such things do not conform to past observation, then it is only these people who can ever be justified in discounting Psychological egoism with this argument - the rest of us must find another path. Even the problem of induction itself has its own problems, and philosophical discussion since Hume founded the inductive problem, has revealed many ways to get around the problem, even if non of these will ever completely eradicate the issues brought to bear by this problem. But to start reciting these arguments now, would be to become weighed down in dogma, so I will move on. It is just important that we remember that such a critique cannot be so damning, if it is damnable itself. Another problem comes from the problem of other minds. If we take the example of a doctor who risks his life running a leper colony, we may be able to say that he is doing it because he couldn't live with himself if he denied his Hippocratic oath, but how can we be certain? After all, we have no special insight into his own mind greater than that which he has himself - and he himself claims to be acting with no self-interest. ...read more.

Conclusion

By following this way of thinking, then situations occur were you must claim that all people should look after themselves, even if this results in the person not looking after themselves. I will explain further: if john and I both have a fatal disease, which can be treated, only with a vaccine, of which there exists only enough for one dose, then I must not only attempt to get the vaccine for myself, but also recommend, should I be asked, that John do the same. However, if I complied with the later action I would clearly not be serving my best interests if I did this. Kurt Baier developed this critique of ethical egoism, concluding that ethical egoism cannot decide in cases of conflicting interests, and such cases are what any ethical system seeks to decide, as, when there is no conflict of interests ethical discussion becomes arbitrary. Ethical egoism is therefore invalid as an ethical system. "...morality is designed to apply... where interests conflict.4" Having a system of morality that is based on self-interest cannot provide any consistency, as morality would fluctuate from person to person, and as such, ethical egoism is at the very least a tenuous and incomplete moral system. And as such I would have to say that the theory of psychological egoism, although not accepted by the greater body of modern philosophers, and although its premises seem intuitively repugnant, is the more accurate view of human morality. 1 Iff = logical statement meaning: "if an only if." 2 Many thanks to Hume on this one 3 Leviathan 4 Kurt Baier ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    Christian Aid also raises money by door-to-door envelope collection during Christian Aid week. Christian Aid funds projects that help people regardless of their beliefs. Some of the work they fund is done through local Christian organisations, but it is for the benefit of all.

  2. Explain how these teachings might influence the actions of a believer?

    this statement of peace is mentioned at the start of many Roman Catholic and Church of England services where this passage is read out 'Christ is our peace. He has made us right with God in one body by the cross.

  1. Different religious and philosophical views on controversial topics.

    make the cause self reliant so that they no longer are in need of charity and may even be able to give their new found time and resources to others still in need. War The world has always been war-stricken, the most recent example being that of the Iraq war which continues to the time of writing.

  2. "Medical research in the U.K. is being suffocated by excessive governance and ethical review".

    of scientific aspects of the protocol by a sponsor or care organisations means the new breed of ethics committees will discuss safety and very vaguely defined ethics only. 24 The main aim since the birth of the Declaration of Helsinki has primarily being the safety of the research participants above all else.

  1. Discuss critically the claim that Freewill and Determinism are incompatible

    Furthermore, is our actions are determined, then we cannot deliberate rationally. It seems wrong to punish people for their actions if they aren't responsible for them in the first place. Many people reject determinism because it rules out moral responsibility, and also because most people have a sense of self-determination or freedom to act.

  2. 'Morality, therefore, is more properly felt than judg'd of'. How does Hume reach this ...

    Hume claims that, in the case of moral distinctions, reason cannot be relied on to discover what is right and wrong, or good and bad.

  1. Explain and discuss one critique of the link between religion and morality

    For example the Crusades resulted in thousands of murders, although the leaders of the Crusades believed what they were doing was morally right and they based their judgement on Christian teachings.

  2. The philosophy of morality.

    With social relativism the problems are that there is no unanimity in society, how do you determine what society approves of? You can't one hundred percent, and if you were to reach a majority vote, is the majority right? Anyone who disagrees has to be wrong by definition, it is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work