• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Asses Sartre's COntribution Toward the philosophy of freedom

Extracts from this document...


Asses Jean-Paul Sartre's Contribution towards the Philosophy of Freedom Freedom as a concept is a large branch of philosophy which looks at issues such as restrictions from government in a political sense as well as a more metaphysical definition involving restrictions on our own actions due to the way in which we choose to act; it is the latter of these two issues which concerns existentialists such as Jean-Paul Sartre. In order to asses Jean-Paul Sartre's contribution toward the philosophy of freedom it is first necessary to look at other philosophers and their influence on this topic. One of the first to comment on the philosophy of freedom, in fact one of the first philosophers in the world, was Aristotle. Aristotle, the most successful product of Plato's academy, devised a four part argument of causality arguing why things come into existence; * Material Cause - The material out of which something is composed for example the material cause for a table is wood * Formal Cause - The idea existing in the first place before an object exists; the formal cause is similar to the idea of forms expressed by Plato. An example is that the formal cause of a table is the idea in the carpenters mind. ...read more.


If a person does believe they have a final cause to their lives leading them through choices they may use this belief to shift guilt or regret from themselves onto their beliefs and use the idea of a final cause to shield themselves from wrong decisions that they have made blaming it on their final cause for guiding them through their choices rather than themselves for making those decisions. The idea of a final cause may cause conflict between religious believers and scientists as to the kind of final cause we posses, a religious believer may argue that we as humans we each have a different telos, this may be seen in particular in Christianity which teaches that everyone is unique in the eyes of God. A biologist may argue that, like other animals we share a common telos is to survive and procreate in order to sustain our species at the expense of exploiting others. In contrast to Aristotle's theory of final cause, modern day philosophers such as Sartre began a new way of thinking leading to the formation of existentialism which opposes the final cause with the claim that humans exist without a purpose and define themselves through their own choices, not a ready made path throughout life. ...read more.


In Christianity man is born a sinner and must turn to God for forgiveness from sins, therefore the nature of humans before any other influence is to sin, consequently essence precedes existence since man is entirely subject to God's plan or blue-print. Leading on from religion the idea that somewhere woven into the fabric of the universe morals exist defining what is right and what is wrong can also be rejected by an existentialist who would argue that it is people themselves who must chose what is right and wrong for themselves and what is right to one person may not be to another. Although this idea does increase individuality many sceptics would argue that human nature, of some kind, does determine our views on what is right and what is wrong, even if this nature is based on primeval notions on what best suits the human species. Supposing existentialism were to be true, with the freedom we gain from defining ourselves we are also left with a great responsibility for our actions. This responsibility may be seen as a negative and many may prefer the loss of freedom to shield themselves from the consequences of their own actions and use excuses for their choices such as "I couldn't help myself" passing the blame from themselves to their nature; a concept rejected by existentialism. ?? ?? ?? ?? Jordan Beasley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Assess Sartre P-E-P

    Sartre uses the example of an inkwell. He argues that an inkwell will always be an inkwell and cannot be any other object. It has a set purpose that cannot be separated from it and no matter what other function we use it for, such as an object to throw at your enemy, it will always be an inkwell.

  2. R.E. Medical issues

    Genetic diseases affect large numbers of people, and doctors can use techniques of genetic engineering to find cures and preventions for such diseases. Defective inherited genes can be responsible for mental retardation, physical deformities and early deaths, and so it is argued by many people that doctors and medical researches

  1. Nature of Individuality.

    This type of behavior is intolerant and immoral. Each and every one of us was customarily chosen by God as his chosen instruments from the moment we were born. We were all created in his image and in his likeness.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Vardy used the analogy of a peasant girl who falls in love with a peasant girl. Although he has the ability to force her, love cannot result out of compulsion. Thus, he chooses to win her round of her own accord.

  1. "Religious experience is all in the mind of the believer" -Examine and comment on ...

    They are eternal and universal, rather the trivial. Transiency; the experience lasts a short time. The memory of the experience dulls with time, though the experience is instantly recalled should it happen again. It is a part of a series of experiences that progress towards increased understanding of the truths being revealed.

  2. "The Sinner is often the Saint." In what way does Greene explore this paradox ...

    nature, and seems to blind him slightly of the fact that he is 'sinning' by continuing his affair with her. On the other hand, George Orwell's critique of the novel suggests that Scobie is fully aware of his misconduct: "If he believed in Hell, he would not risk going there

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work