"Charity does not have the effect Christians want. It makes people lazy and keeps them poor." Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer, showing you have thought about more than one point of view

Authors Avatar

Charity does not have the effect Christians want. It makes people lazy and keeps them poor.” Do you agree? Give reasons for your answer, showing you have thought about more than one point of view

        In part I do agree with this statement, as I do think that charities do not have the entire effect that Christians want, but I do not feel that it makes the poor people lazy and keeps them poor.

A charity would struggle to have the entire effect that Christians would want. The ultimate aim of a charity of course would be to eliminate poverty throughout the world, and this has certainly not been achieved. Even with all the charities in the world today, the individual charities such as Tearfund, Christian aid, and every other charity working towards the world poverty crisis, there has been little change in its state. The huge effort made by those involved in the Band-Aid, who raised millions in order to bring food to those who have none amidst the famine in Ethiopia, had an effect at the time, but was not long term but short term aid. The problem of famine remains. Yes these people need food, but they need the means to produce food themselves. It is long-term aid that is needed, not short-term aid.

Join now!

        This brings me to my disagreement on the second part of the phrase. The poor are kept poor by the rich. They are not lazy, they do not keep themselves poor, but simply have no means of obtaining what they need to survive on their own, and thus remain poor. The rich can give them food to last a day, but they do not give them what they really need, which is the tools, water, and land on which to farm. Given these things, which were taken away from them through disasters such as war, they could survive by themselves, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay