• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe Kant's reasons for defending the need for the categorical imperative. How useful are Kantian ethics for drawing conclusions about abortion?

Extracts from this document...


A. Describe Kant's reasons for defending the need for the categorical imperative. B. How useful are Kantian ethics for drawing conclusions about abortion? (A) Kant's belief was that we should act for the sake of the action, not for an ulterior motive. Laws should be universal, and we should follow them out of a sense of duty. By doing this we are following our own intrinsic goodness. So why was it so important to Kant to defend the need for his theory? In 1788, Immanuel Kant, (a deontologist), laid a new foundation for ethics and religion with the categorical imperative. Kant believed in the freedom of humans to make their own decisions and considered the exploitation of humans to be the worst evil. Human reason gives us the right to choose and we are therefore able to freely make moral decisions. The categorical imperative states that if 'I ought', therefore 'I can'. It is an absolute law that has no conditions and is consequently a method of making moral decisions. When making decisions, we should not follow our inclinations, but our duty, which is more than just personal preference. Kant's imperative is categorical, in that it tells us which of our actions would be good in the form of a command. ...read more.


The goodness of good will is not derived from the goodness of its results, but it is having the right intention that makes the good will good. Due to all of these aspects, Kant feels that it is a sense of duty that drives humans to do morally good actions, and avoid those that will be morally bad. His ethics appear to be only a tool that leads us to morality. However, by not providing us with any rules or laws, it could be hard to see which moral rules can and cannot be universalised. (B) Kant explains non-ethical theories as either, true without knowledge, or possibly true or false, with validation through knowledge. Ethical theories on the other hand are knowable through reason, not experience and they may not be true. So by looking at abortion through reason, how easy is it to draw conclusions about abortion? There are so many moral dilemmas surrounding abortion, the rights of the mother, the rights of the foetus, the concept of potential life, personhood etc. Kant rejects the view that we can know and make decisions about abortion from experience, and he says that we make them through reason instead. So how easy is it to reason whether abortion is wrong or not? ...read more.


A further part of Kant's theory is to say that, if "I ought", therefore "I can". So if one ought to have an abortion, because it is the best thing to do, then one can have an abortion. This assertion however would be strongly renounced by Kant's followers, as a perverse assertion of his ethics. With all the debate, we can see that Kant is apposed to abortion, and condemns it as morally wrong. So the usefulness of Kant theories for abortion are very one sided. If a woman found herself in the situation, it may be easier to look at a morality that is biased towards a certain end, but nevertheless, many women will still want an impartial view when making decisions about abortion. Kant does not give us an moral guidance concerning the issues of rights or personhood, these are conclusions we should supposedly draw for ourselves. For that reason, Kant's ethics may be suited to some, but the majority of people would want to be able to decide about their own body and their own life for themselves, and not have to follow rules that should apply to everyone; especially as abortion is not necessarily considered an issue for everyone, men cannot have babies after all. Useful may not be the right term to use in this situation; convenient maybe would suit it better, in particular in relation to Kant. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Abortion and other medical issues section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Abortion and other medical issues essays

  1. The Moral Issue of Abortion

    real life cases of people having to decide to have an abortion or not. The first example showed a woman that wanted an abortion because she didn't have enough money to support a child. The second showed a girl who was only 16 and wanted an abortion because she was too young and had her whole life ahead of her.

  2. Abortion- Moral Issues

    Pro-life activism involves a variety of activities, from promoting the pro-life position to the public in general, lobbying public officials, or reaching individuals - for example by attempting to dissuade individual women to forgo abortions. Some efforts involve distributing literature, providing counseling services, conducting public demonstrations or protests, and committing acts of civil disobedience.

  1. Is The Sanctity of Life to be regarded as a Moral Absolute? Discuss in ...

    Due to the extent and the duration of the happiness felt by those involved for the saved life of the woman, the abortion should be carried out. I do not believe that a foetus should be considered be considered as subhuman, and I do not agree with abortion for a

  2. Is the Sanctity of Life to be regarded as a Moral Absolute? Discuss in ...

    Another view that it is not breathing that makes you human because all animals breathe yet are not human. Criticisms against non-biblical views that the foetus is subhuman is that if the foetus has to know who and what it is to be human, then anyone who is in a coma are not human.

  1. Religion and Medical Ethics: Abortion

    In these actions, is God not doing the same thing as a woman might do when she has an abortion? She is terminating her pregnancy because it is not what she wants, it is not what she planned, and she is unsure whether she will like the outcome.

  2. Medical ethics: Three scenarios Mabel, Jack and Rupert.

    However the question that concerns Mabel is when does a human become a person and responsible to the moral community. There are 8 main approaches to this. Christians believe that the moment in which the foetus gains a soul "God breathed Spirit".

  1. Religion and Medical Ethics

    Introducing Christian Doctrine, Baker Book House Mayled, Jon & Libby, Ahluwalia - Discovery Study Guide: Philosophy & Ethics for OCR GCSE Religious Studies, Nelson Thornes Internet http://www.mariestopes.org.uk/uk/abortion-uk-law.htm www.umc.org/interior.asp?mid=1732 Part B - Explain how these teachings might influence the actions of a believer.

  2. What is meant by the word abortion?

    Pro-life Christians claim abortion is completely disobeying this reference. Despite all of these rules, supposedly tarnished by abortion, some pro-life Christians accept that the taking of life can be justified as long as the person isn't an innocent person. I think that this is warped because all of humanity is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work