• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the theological and philosophical views on euthanasia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Euthanasia A. Euthanasia is the ending of life to end suffering. It comes from the Greek Thanatos meaning 'good death'. There are different types of euthanasia > Voluntary- when a person makes the decision themselves to die. > Compulsory- when a person doesn't make the decision themselves to die. > active- when something is given toe end someone's life e.g. a drug > Passive- when a person's treatment is taken away that is keeping them alive. They die from natural causes. There are different combinations > voluntary/active > compulsory/active > voluntary/passive > compulsory/passive The essay is getting you to think about theological and philosophical views on euthanasia. Many different religions possess different viewpoints. This is due to the fact that different religions interpret the Bible in different ways, for example the Roman Catholic church read the Bible and interpret it fundamentally and say 'that's a good reading, lets take it like that' but the Church of England would interpret it differently and say 'that's a good reading, what does it mean?'. The Bible has a great influence on all denominations of the Christian church. It influences Christians because it is their Holy Scripture, much like the Koran or the Jewish Scrolls. It influences the denominations differently however. ...read more.

Middle

They do believe that life is sacred and holy but when your time comes it is time to leave and we shouldn't put it back. The fact is all Christian denominations believe that life is holy and sacred but when a person's time comes they should be allowed to go peacefully and not be kept alive by machines and artificial respiration if the practice isn't going to make the person better. Different churches have different reactions to ' There are times when someone should be allowed to die rather than being kept alive against their will'. The Roman Catholics agree with this statement when it catatonia and vegetation is involved. They don't feel that keeping someone alive with machines is viable if the person isn't going to have a miraculous recovery. Otherwise the Roman Catholic Church has an absolute morality. No euthanasia, because switching off a machine isn't euthanasia because the person isn't going to get better anyway. The Catholics are fundamentalists, which means they take things as read. If the Bible says 'your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19) then it is. If you destroy life then you are destroying part of God. The Roman Catholic Church also believes in palliative care such as hospices. ...read more.

Conclusion

I think that if a patient wants to die then they should be allowed to. If they are in pain and want to spare themselves the physical pain and the suffering and they want to spare their family the mental anguish of watching them die then they should be allowed to. A person should be allowed to have a dignified death. I don't think Christians on the whole (taking into consideration the size of the Quakers in comparison to the Catholics) are in favour of Euthanasia because of the whole concept of death. A person's quality of life may be dismal now but what quality of life will the person have when they're dead. I also think that the arguments against euthanasia are fair and reasonable as long as someone ways up their arguments first. I agree with the reasons because they are important to the argument. I think that a Christian should keep an open mind on the case of euthanasia and the likes but I know they won't. I don't think that the reasons are particularly justified just because the Pope or the Bible says so, I also don't think that it is fair that one person can have such control over people's beliefs just because that person is the Pope. I think it is unfair that the arguments that the arguments both for and against euthanasia come from an ancient text that had been written and re-written thousands of times. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. Euthanasia essay

    This brings one of the main problems the argument of the santicty of life approach against the autonomy of the individual . The church believes that life is sacred and dissagree's will any of the following crimes against life such as murder , suicide,abortion etc.

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Also, Hindus believe that if a life is ended at the wrong time the cycle of rebirth is damaged. Pressure groups are organisations which have a certain strong feeling towards an issue. They put pressure on the government to come round to their way of thinking.

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    The religious argument against euthanasia has many component parts. The Bible prohibits voluntary euthanasia at any cost (4), with quotes such as 'Thou shall not kill' Exodus 20:13. But the Bible (10) believes that people should not suffer, so if you did not give them pain relief, then this would not be euthanasia.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    Christians ( except when they may have to sacrifice themselves for others ). So suicide and euthanasia are wrong. Suffering can lead people to make mistakes, not just in the case of suicide but also in asking for euthanasia. It is best to understand this as a crying out for love and for help.

  1. Euthanasia- coursework on Christian belief, ethical philosophers and that of the medical establishment.

    a lot of pain, and has, in the past seen her in immense amounts of pain, cannot comprehend what she goes through. Their sufferings can be so terrible that we do not even like to think about it. The argument from mercy says that euthanasia is justifiable because it puts an end to the terrible suffering.

  2. Euthanasia and types of euthanasia

    The Voluntary Euthanasia Society wants to allow people "with a severe illness from which no relief is known" to be lawfully killed" if they wish. One US euthanasia campaigner has suggested people could be killed on the basis of their previous instructions, even if they now want to live.(www.

  1. Is Euthanasia accepted within Society? ...

    Persons whose quality of life is non-existent should have the right to decide to commit suicide, and to seek assistance if necessary. 'According to Christian teaching, suffering especially suffering during the last moments of life, has a special place in God's saving plan' it is in truth a sharing in

  2. Euthanasia is a loving, Christian response Discuss.

    This form of execution is seen as the ultimate punishment (often because the criminal is seen as a large danger to society), supposedly painless, but still inflicted as some form of suffering through death. Something administered as a permanent punishment is also used as a permanent "pain reliever".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work