• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

Extracts from this document...


Abby-Jane Hunt. 15.20.03. Examine the design argument for the existence of God. The Teleological argument-also known as the design argument is an a posteriori argument. This means that the truth of the proposition may only be known to be true after experiential evidence has been used to prove the proposition true or false. In other words, we have to experiment with the proposition before a conclusion can be drawn. The argument is based on observation of apparent order in the universe and the natural world, to conclude that it is not all the result of chance but of design. The world has such design in it, that a designer must have been the reason for such intricate details. Thereby pointing towards God. Socrates- " With such signs of forethought in the design of living creatures, can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?" In the above quote, Socrates is saying that when you look at creatures you can see that their design was planned before the actual creation process. So, by looking at this can you still say that they are simply the way they are by chance and not choice or design? There are four basic points that lay out the classical argument for design and they are: 1) ...read more.


Aquinas- "Hence it is plain that they achieve their end, not fortuitously but designedly. Now whatever lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless it be directed by some being endowed with knowledge and intelligence; as the arrow is directed by the archer. Therefore some intelligent being exists by whom all natural things are directed to their end; and this being we call God." In this quote, Aquinas is saying that all the order apparent in the world is proof of a designer- this designer being God. However, the design qua purpose aspect looks at the world in relation to the ways the parts fit together for a purpose of some sort. The design is compared to a man-made machine where the parts have been fitted together for a purpose. With a mobile for instance- the parts have been designed so that they can transmit messages and calls. If the parts had simply been put together at random, then the mobile wouldn't be able to transmit messages for it wouldn't be able to function at all! William Paley- "In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone, and were asked how the stone came to be there, I might possibly answer, that for anything I knew to the contrary it had lain there for ever........ ...read more.


1) The fact the world can be analysed in a rational manor. 2) The way in which the inorganic world provided the basic necessities required to sustain life. 3) The progress of evolution towards the emergence of intelligent human life. Tennant believed that it would be able to imagine a chaotic universe in which no rules applied, however, the universe isn't chaotic and was designed so that the evolutionary process would create an environment in which intelligent life could exist. Tennant also believed in the Aesthetic principle to prove God's existence, Tennat argued that humans possess the ability to appreciate the beauty of their surroundings. Yet such ability is not necessary for survival or development of life. Therefore this is evidence of a creator. Thereby not being a result of natural selection- evolutionary change. So, in conclusion- the design argument has a lot of proof for the existence of God. It doesn't matter what part of the argument you look at because in the end they all point towards the same conclusion. Everything in our universe has been designed to intricately for it to be chance. Why would a watch have hands if it wasn't to tell us the time? Why would a car drive unless someone had designed it to do so? Everything in our world points towards having a designer, and the only person capable of designing such products is God. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Teleological Argument.

    Although he says this, he does not deny that the design argument doesn't work. What he says that if it does work, then the God it portrays is one who is anthropomorphic, limited and imperfect. He makes his point clearly, 'The world, for aught the user of the design argument

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    All of its complex parts co-operate together to create a working part, which is evidence of it being designed. He talks about the lacteal system, where particular animals have a number of teats relevant to their number of offspring. This cannot be coincidence, and is therefore more evidence for design.

  1. Outline the design argument for the existence of God.

    Hume also disliked the God that the Design Argument pointed to. This designer appears to be an anthropomorphic God, who is more human than divine. If you use the analogy of a designer, there are good designers and there are bad designers.

  2. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    are verses which indicate that this universe was created by one God and therefore agree with William Paley's theory. In the first section of the Holy Quran, Chapter number one, verse number two it states, 'All the praises and thanks be to Allah (God), the Lord of the Alameen (mankind, jinns and all that exists.')

  1. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    If the universe is the result of a benevolent God why does evil exist? Indeed he makes a mockery of the concept of benevolent God via the very existence of evil, stating that the universe could have been the product of a child like deity or lesser God merely playing.

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    He claims that Paley was "gloriously and utterly wrong". Natural selection is a blind and automatic process with no foresight or purpose: "The only watchmaker in nature is the blind force of physics" (ibid, p.71) Those that still believe the universe has a Creator hold a metaphysical speculation that can not be examined scientifically.

  1. Outline and Critically Evaluate the design Argument

    Similarities occur when discussing the apparent existence of the world and inhabitants of it. Hume believes that the world shows evidence of regularity as expected from such a great thing otherwise it could not continue.

  2. Examine the design argument for the existence of God.

    I will begin by outlining William Paley's version of the design argument. Paley5 puts forward the most famous form of the design argument, using analogy6. Paley presented the following situation; in order to consolidate his argument: '...In crossing a heath, suppose I pitched my foot against a stone, and were

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work