• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the Cosmological Argument from Aquinas and Copleston There are many arguments that can he presented to prove the existence of God. In defending the faith

Extracts from this document...


Explain the Cosmological Argument from Aquinas and Copleston There are many arguments that can he presented to prove the existence of God. In defending the faith, however, it is useful to present a way of proving the existence of God that begins from the fact of the existence of the world. Arguments of this type are referred to as "cosmological" arguments. The term "cosmological" means "based on the fact of the cosmos." The world obviously exists, and yet cannot explain its own existence; therefore, something else must account for it. But, if we are to develop another unexplained existence of some kind, this "something else" must contain within itself, the cause of its own existence. Such an uncaused being is God. This simple statement gives the essence of the cosmological argument, but it is strengthened and made logically defensible when developed to its fullest extent. ...read more.


This is what Aquinas defined as God. Also related to Aquinas' First Way is the dependency argument, which argued that God sustains the universe. If God discontinued to exist, then the universe itself would stop existing; therefore, there must be an initiator of the change whose continued existence is depended upon, hence the dependency argument. This leads to Aquinas' Second Way (The Uncaused Causer) in which he gives the following premises: "Every effect has a cause", "Infinite regress is impossible" which he uses to arrive to this conclusion: "There must be a first cause." Everything that happens has a cause and even the cause itself has a cause but since it would be illogical to assume that the first cause has a cause, Aquinas decided that the first cause would be known as the Uncaused Causer, according to him, this was God. ...read more.


That is, of beings no one of which can account for its own existence. This is taken from the 1948 radio debate between Copleston and Russell: " I say that that if there were no necessary being, no being which must exist and cannot not-exist, nothing would exist. The infinity of the series of contingent beings, even if proved, would be irrelevant. Something does exist; therefore, there must be something which accounts for this fact, a being which is outside the series of contingent beings." Bertrand Russell believed that the universe is just there, and that's all there was to it. He assumes that the universe is intelligible and ultimately depends on an eternal self-existent reality. Copleston associates Russell's approach of refuting the problem to saying "If one refused to even sit down at the chess board and make a move, one cannot of course, be checkmated." ?? ?? ?? ?? Michele Dominique 13B 22.02.06 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    it would have been impossible for anything to have begun to exist and thus even now nothing would be in existence which is absurd... therefore we cannot but admit the some being having off itself its own necessity , and not receiving it from another, but rather causing in others there necessity.

  2. A summary of the Cosmological argument according to Thomas Aquinas and Copleston.

    Aquinas states that, since everything we know in the Universe is contingent upon something else, the Universe must itself be contingent upon other prior activities. A good analogy is that of a watch. The movement of Tom Smolen each wheel in a watch is explainable by its specific interlocking with

  1. "Discuss critically religious and secular ethical arguments about environmental issues"

    (Chapter 24 'Light', Verse 45). If all beings on this earth are created equally by God, what right do we have to treat other animals as anything less than equal human beings? The Quran frequently refers to heaven as a beautiful garden, and so many Muslims believe that proper care of our Earthly environment makes sense.

  2. Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

    if they have little impact alone, why would they have greater impact together? This approach can leave you with the 'God of Philosophers' rather than the 'God of Religious Belief'.

  1. Frederick Copleston and Bertrand Russell's and their responses to the Cosmological argument.

    'I should say that the universe is just there, and that is all.' Russell argues ignorantly that his universe exists entirely without reason. It is a mere 'brute fact.' Copleston went forth to argue that 'If one refuses to sit at the chess board and make a move, one cannot, of course, be checkmated."

  2. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    ideas is the next way of proving God and we do this by using ideas about logic such as mathematics. Finally is matters of fact which uses solid evidence such as history and science to prove God's existence. The first argument I am going to cover falls under the matters of fact arguments and is the Cosmological argument.

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    Anthony Kenny said that Aquinas's principle that nothing moves itself, goes against the fact that people and animals move themselves. He pointed out that Newton's law wrecks the argument of the first way. "For at any given time the rectilinear uniform motion of a body can be explained by the

  2. Explain how Thomas Aquinas attempts to prove the existence of God.

    1 ? The Argument of the Unmoved Mover - In his first argument, Aquinas tries to prove that God must be the cause of motion in the universe. Aquinas defines, using Aristotle?s dichotomy of potentiality and actuality, that some things are in motion and others the potential to be in motion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work