• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain the difference between knowing something and believing something

Extracts from this document...


Explain the difference between knowing something and believing something Something doesn't have to be true to be believable. People say lies and people believe them. There are things out, such as God, which there is no actually evidence to his/her being real, but for years people believe there is one. You can't stop someone believing something. Back in Columbus's day, people didn't even believe about the world being anything but flat, until Columbus proved it. He had evidence, it was proved that the world was, in actually fact, sphere. In this essay, I am going to show how believing something and knowing something is different and try explain the differences. The characteristics of knowledge are that it must be true; knowledge can't be knowledge if there is any doubt in any of it. ...read more.


Belief is something that someone wants to believe, whether it's true or not. There are two main types of philosophers, i) Empiricism - where philosophers believe that knowledge comes from our senses ii) Rationalism - where philosophers believe that knowledge comes through from our reasons and thoughts Some say that Empiricism is not a good way to believe where our knowledge comes from. Our senses can deceive us, for example, when we think we see someone we know on the street and wave to them, but our eyes have deceived us, because it isn't who we thought it was. Our thoughts are part of our knowledge, if we had no thoughts, we wouldn't have knowledge of anything, because we couldn't think about them. ...read more.


However, there are some arguments that can just be straightforward and true, for example, "I did not have mothballs for dinner last night", I know this, it was in the past, it has happened, I was there when I ate my dinner, I know that I had a curry, not mothballs, I know there is a difference between what mothballs are and what my curry looked like. This is a justified statement; I believe it, I know it is true and I saw the evidence. It is impossible to know something, which is yet to happen in the future. It may not happen - there could be a snowstorm tonight, which prevents you go out and doing what you intended, or the world might end tomorrow, so obviously you won't be able to what you wanted. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. There is No Way of Knowing What God is like

    Humans often see God as a fatherly figure. Whether this view point has been influenced by parents and upbringings or personal knowledge and decisions, it is almost always true. A study of believers in God showed that when asked to describe God, most people said "like a father - caring, loving and forgiving".

  2. Extreme Rationalism

    Empirical science is about observation of events and the development of an understanding of cause and effect. For example, in a system based on religious ideas an active volcano would be explained in terms of some kind of Divine intervention, usually seen as the wrath of a God who had been offended for some reason.

  1. Can we know something that has not yet been proven true?

    I have personally come across a discussion relating the 'seeing is believing' theory, and this happened in religion class, where the students were asked to debate on the available evidence of God's existence.

  2. Why is there something rather than nothing?

    Matter is always reacting with other matter and causing innumerable different things. We use maths and to be more specific, algebra to model what actually happens when matter reacts or to use a wider viewpoint what happens in our world.

  1. Compare the respective approaches of rationalism and empiricism towards a theory of knowledge ...

    Descartes set up a problem... "How do the mind and the body connect?" This question has presented problems to all rationalists. To make it easier, the mind and the body were referred as the following; Mind - Incorporeal (has no substance to make it up)

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    Things are the way they are and if things were different then everything would be different. The way things are does not imply design or a designer. Philo's second argument It is possible that the Universe resulted from chance Philo's second argument can be summarized as follows: 1.

  1. "By discovering something new, a character can change for the better." Is this ...

    the suggestion that this is not the Mariner's first recital, that he has already been travelling for a tremendously expansive amount of time telling his tale, since the actual event. As a result of intently listening to the Mariner's tale, the Wedding guest is finally declared to have become, "A sadder and wiser man".

  2. What is Knowledge? Explain and Illustrate

    No experience is needed for this to be classed as 'knowledge' but these statements are true. This also applies to logic and deductive reasoning. Knowledge by Acquaintance Knowing something or someone is not the same as knowing facts about something or someone.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work