• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion.

Extracts from this document...


Explain what Scholars means when they say ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion. The study of ethical language is Meta-ethics. When some scholars say that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion, they believe that the statements are based on non-cognitive theories. In contrast, others would disagree that ethical statements can be verified by evidence and reason. They are believed to be cognitivists or moral realists. Scholars who are anti-realists believe that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion as they are expressing their feelings or telling people what to do. For example, to say 'abortion is wrong' is not a factual statement that can be proved right or wrong. However, cognitivists argue that when saying 'abortion is wrong' they are giving abortion the property of wrongness so the statement is either true or false, making it objective rather than subjective. One theory that is based on non-cognitive ideas is Emotivism. Emotivists agree that ethical statements are no more than expressions of opinion as they believe that ethical statements depend on one's attitudes, upbringings and feelings. In support of this theory according to A.J. Ayer, a philosopher, who argued that unverifiable statements held no philosophical significance, believed that words such as 'right', 'wrong', 'good' or 'bad' were essentially meaningless. ...read more.


Essentially prescriptivists are writing a law which has a universal quality that should be applied to everyone. Therefore, some scholars claim that moral statements such as 'good', 'ought', or 'right' have a universalizable and prescriptive element within the ethical statement. Although they are no more than expressions of opinion, prescriptivists argue that their views promote principles that everyone should follow in applicable conditions. According to Hare: 'I have been maintaining that the meaning of the word 'ought' and other moral words is such that a person who uses them commits himself thereby to a universal rule.' This means that when an individual uses moral words, such as 'ought', they have committed themselves to a universal rule whereby they are setting laws for themselves in order for people to follow. Both Emotivism and Prescriptivism agree that ethical statements are not just expressions of opinion as these theories believe that statements cannot be verified. However, Emotivism differs from Prescriptivism, as it does not express their views on how to live a moral life, but simply to understand the meaning behind ethical statements. On the other hand, Prescriptivists are not just expressing their views either; they are also prescribing them to others. From this perspective Hare argues that Prescriptivism is superior to all cognitive and non-cognitive theories. ...read more.


It is arguable that this theory is not justified as it serves no real purpose as it is just one's opinions, which others do not need to take account for. In addition, it is questionable that one's intention to stimulate others may be for the wrong reasons; therefore offering a solution that may not be good for others to follow makes this view unjustified. On the other hand Ross offers a solution during conflict and clearly differentiates between the right and good thing to do. This is more reliable to some extent because Ross supports his solutions with examples and logical evidence. On the contrary, it is arguable that the accuracy of Intuitionism is not very reliable as Moore fails to prove or demonstrates his theory for knowing truths by using our intuition. The strengths of prescriptivism are the universal principles available to people. To some degree, these views are justified as it provides common rules for people to follow. The universalizabilty also encourages people to follow one's wishes or desires, because the prescriptive quality benefits not only the individual, but others around them. In addition, people expect their moral statements to have some influence on others. However, Ethical Naturalism would argue that ethical statements are more reliable, as it provides a modern and scientific outlook on ethics, rather than expressing universal prescriptions that aren't truth claims. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    The agency I have chosen to analyse and explain about for my chosen religious agency is 'Christian Aid.' I have chosen them, because I believe overall that they do the correct thing to help the needy. Christian aid is an agency of the churches in the UK and Ireland; Christian Aid works wherever the need is greatest, irrespective of religion.

  2. Christian Views on Wealth & poverty

    Jesus told this story to illustrate the phrase; "love your neighbour as yourself.." Jesus used two mortal enemies, the Samaritans, and the Jews. In this story, the one who showed the injured man any sympathy, was not the priest, or the Levite, but, the person that did show this Jew any compassion, was their arch enemy the Samaritan.

  1. In this essay I will talk about this question Do we need God to ...

    This is good as it encourages Buddhists to do good as they know about what will happen to them in their next life. Christians think differently to what Buddhists believe as they think that god has set rules to live by, they believe that god's laws give as guidance which

  2. Euthanasia can never be justified

    how the disease will progress is wrong and the patient is not going to die soon. The patient could be is getting bad medical care and their suffering could be relieved by other means. Doctors could be unaware of other non-fatal options that could be offered to the patient.

  1. Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on the acquisition of ethical understanding.

    Hughes argues that since Aristotle is relates the aim we have in life to ethics, ethics must be based on the capabilities of the human soul. In this sense, our nature and matter determines both our aim and what fulfilment is for us.

  2. What is meant by relativism, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the point ...

    Relativism has its advantages against absolutism; it avoids conflict, and is often seen to be a lot more tolerant towards other cultures, however, this could also be seen as a disadvantage, for should we accept the ku klux klan's beliefs of persecuting a minority group?

  1. Explain how Meta-Ethics differs from Normative Ethics.

    An action may be good because the action is generous, but Moore would argue that good isn't identical to generosity. When good is added to a sentence its affect is different from normal adjectives. 'A good red hat', the good adds a quality to the description.

  2. "Describe and evaluate Emotivism, showing knowledge of its key thinkers and critics?"

    The "Boo / Hurrah theory", is a less intellectual name for Emotivism. In essence it is a way of successfully describing the theory. It is a very simple theory which demonstrates the idea. When shown a picture of an image, a person will have a gut feeling about the image of which he or she had just seen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work