• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Only God has the right to interfere with our genes.(TM) Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...


'Only God has the right to interfere with our genes.' Do you agree? Genetic engineering is "the deliberate modification of the characters of an organism by manipulation of genetic material", meaning that genes are manipulated and modified in order to prevent a hereditary disease being passed on. The research into genetic engineering in the UK is controlled by the Human Fertilisation and Embryo Authority. A group named the Human Genome Project has been set up with the aim of mapping every gene in the human body so that a defective gene can be identified and replaced with a healthy one. There are several diseases which could be helped by genetic engineering; cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy, sickle-cell anaemia, Tay-Sachs disease and Huntington's chorea. Cystic fibrosis is where there is a build up of mucus in the lungs which causes breathing problems as well as causing problems with the functions of the pancreas leading to digestion problems. ...read more.


However, the non-religious arguments against genetic engineering are as follows: there is not enough information about long term consequences, if anything went wrong the effects would be permanent, scientists could potentially create a race of 'perfect humans'. It treats the human body as a commodity similar to a plant. Also, it creates the possibility of people having to be genetically screened before getting life insurance etc. People likely to die young or develop illnesses would lose out. There are different views on genetic engineering throughout the various Churches of Christianity. Liberal Protestants support genetic engineering as long as it is to cure disease and not create 'perfect humans'. They think this because Jesus showed that Christians should try their best to cure disease, also they feel that genetic cures are no different to drug cures. They also accept all non-religious arguments in favour of genetic engineering. ...read more.


had a disorder which caused him to have brittle bones decided to have a child, this child may or may not have the disorder when she is born. It turned out the child was born with brittle bones and had to endure great hardship from breaking bones whenever she fell over. Some people would feel that it was morally wrong for the father to have a child knowing the risk and hardship the child could encounter. However, the father felt that he should be able to have a child with his partner even though there was a chance the disorder could have been passed on. In conclusion, I disagree with the statement that only God has the right to interfere with our genes because genetic engineering could potentially improve the quality of life for thousands and thousands of people, also, God gave us this power and so we should use it to help the human race. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Abortion and other medical issues section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Abortion and other medical issues essays

  1. Abortion arguments and powerful images

    Christians use the bible to support their views on abortion. All Christians think that abortion is wrong, but some strongly think this and some agree that abortion should be acceptable under certain circumstances. Here are some quotes from the bible to show why Christians may be guided to disagree with abortions and why.

  2. Beloved - Summary of major characters

    They then thread the chain for the chain gang through their legs. After being forced to perform oral sex on the white guards, they spend their day in hard labor. After 86 days in prison, Paul D feels life is dead.

  1. "Only God has the right to interfere with our genes"

    Other Muslims are in favour of genetic engineering. They believe that as long as it is being done to cure diseases, it is acceptable. The Qur'an and Hadith teach that Muslims should do their best to cure sickness. They believe that as khalifahs humans should use all means available to improve human life.

  2. Medical Ethics Coursework - Genetic Engineering arguments

    Another reason as to why some Christians may agree to genetic engineering is because by discovering new solutions and utilizing information we already now to improve human life we are doing nothing different as to the research of drugs. Genetic engineering is commonly mistaken for cloning, which is creating a

  1. Abortion, Right or Wrong

    I believe that this is not true and that that this 'foetus' is a human being. It states in Jeremiah 1:5 "Before you were formed in the body of your mother, I had knowledge of you, and before birth I made you holy, I have given you the work of being a prophet to the nations."

  2. "Death is God's business and people should not interfere"

    * Before the time of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), unwanted female children were often buried alive in Arabia. Islam is opposed to abortion because the Qu'ran teaches: "Kill not your offspring for fear of poverty, it is We who provide for them and for you.

  1. Only God has the right to interfere with our genes. Do you agree?

    Due to the fact that the processes used are relatively new there is no way of telling if they will have any significant repercussions, for example, on any patient's children or children's children. Most people, who have hesitations about genetic engineering, including Christians and Muslims, are worried about the development and manufacture of a 'perfect person'.

  2. Challenges to Roe v. Wade - women's right to privacy?

    This happened in Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health (1983), where the Court rejected Akron City Council's decision to put considerable obstacles (24-hour waiting period, prejudiced informed consent etc.) on the way of an abortion-seeking woman (Akron v. Akron, 1983). This was one more positive achievement of pro-choice activists.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work