Fiction or history, story or truth, myth or religion, these are questions that are applied to the ancient epic of Gilgamesh. Interestingly, these same questions apply to another major work, the Bible.

blameless in that age and deserved salvation from total destruction (Genesis 6:9). Though God did not use a dream to notify Noah, both were instructed on what to take on the ark. Load the seed of every living thing into your ark, Ea says to Utnapishtim (Sin-Leqi-Unninni XI, I, 27). Likewise, God told Noah to take pairs of each type of animal with him to keep their issue alive all over the earth, (Genesis 7:2). Noah and Utnapishtim both took family members with them in the ark. Noah took take his wife and his sons and his sons wives (Genesis 7:18). Utnapishtim took some friends with him, along with his family (Lorey). Overall, the frameworks of the descriptions are comparable from how the main character learns of the flood to the sacrifice that man makes after landing (Clough). Both men had seven days to complete the arks before it started raining, however, in the Biblical account, it rained for forty days and forty nights (Genesis 7; 12), while, according to Utnapishtim, the flood lasted six days and seven nights (Sin-Leqi-Unninni XI, ii, 127). When the flood was over, the two boats proved to have landed in the same region of the Middle East (Lorey). Supposedly, Noahs ark landed on Mount Ararat, while Utnapishtims ark landed some 300 miles away on Mount Nisir (Casselman). There are somewhere around 80,000 flood stories in seventy-two languages, yet these are two have the closest landing spots (Kneisler). Landing so closely together, it must be maintained that one writer or people borrowed the concept from the other, while modifying it slightly to fit that geographical area. After landing, both survivors thanked their protector by sacrifice. Utnapishtim set out a drink offering upon the ziggurat of the mountain and set up the sacrifice. Noah offered an animal up to God and God, seeing this, said to Noah Never again will I doom the earth because of man, (Genesis 8:21). Enlil, a minor god, blesses Utnapishtim with immortality, which is intersesting, considering Noah was already six hundred years old at the beginning of the flood. Here, the Sumerians may have taken the fact that Noah was so abnormally old as immortal, weaving it in to their own flood story. Taken as a whole, the flood stories have similar details that make it impossible to believe that there is some connection between them.A less obvious parallel is in the creation of Adam in the Bible and in Gilgamesh, the creation of Enkidu. There are actually two different stories in the Bible in which Adam is created while there is only one story of Enkidus formation. Combining the two Biblical accounts, however, gives many parallels to Gilgamesh. In Genesis, chapter 2, Adam, the first man, is created out of clay (line 7). Similarly, when Aruru, the mother goddess forms Enkidu, she throws clay into the wilderness where she gives birth to Enkidu (Sin-Leqi-Unninni tablet I, column ii, line 35). This concept of formation out of the earth makes man one with the earth. Adam and Enkidu are portrayed as one with nature, an idea that cannot be original to both accounts. In chapter 1 of Genesis, the writer gives a little more information on the creation of Adam. It is stated that God formed man in His image, (27). When creating an equal for Gilgamesh, Aruru form[s] an image of Anu in her heart, (Sin-Leqi-Unninni I, ii, 33). Anu is the god of gods; he is the highest of the pantheon as John Gardner explains in his interpretation of the work (Sin-Leqi-Unninni 71). Enkidu is made in the image of Anu with one very important detail, he is mortal, which connects to Adams creation. Adam, made in the likeleness of God, is also mortal, though much like God. With the god-like image, both men are in tune with nature which could possibly be the ideal way of life for the writers of both works, explaining why both stories have these significant details.Again, stressing harmony in nature, Enkidu grows up in the wilderness. He fed with the gazelles on the grass/with the wild animals he drank at waterholes (Sin-Leqi-Unninni I, ii, 39-40). There seems to be a link here with the creation of Adam; at first, Adam is given dominance over the animals in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 1:30). It is only later that this is gift is taken away from him, when he gains knowledge. Enkidu also gains knowledge, in the form of a womans love. After a courtesan lies with him, the beasts of the wilderness fled from his body, as if Enkidu is now too civilized and the animals sense it (Sin-Leqi-Unninni I, iv 25). Adams problem, stems from a woman: Eve tempts Adam to eat the forbidden fruit, which gives him knowledge, and as a punishment, God cast him out of Eden, separating him from nature (Genesis 3:17-24). While the use of a woman suggests evil rooting from females, as many myths and religions believe, the harmony with animals depicts how man came to dominate the earth. A very large question has always been, why is man so superior to the animals? This is one way to explain it. Again, the similarities are so close that it is hard to ignore the fact that one influenced the other.Most people conclude that the ancient story of Gilgamesh the hero and king influenced the later writing of the Bible (Kneisler). Yet, in the words of Frank Lorey of the Institute for Creation Research in California, the probability exists that the Biblical account had been preserved either as an oral tradition, or in written form handed down from Noah and eventually to Moses, thereby making it actually older than the Sumerian accounts" (2). This statement, while referring to just the flood stories, should be applied to all the similarities between the Old Tesetament and Gilgamesh. While there is estimation as to when Gilgamesh was written and what period the story originally comes from (as early as 3000 B.C.), there is no evidence of when the Bible was written (Loery). Since the Old Testament covers a span of almost two thousand years, it is very likely that before it was written down (somewhere around 1000 B.C.) it was passed on orally. Therefore, it is wrong to assume that concepts in the Bible were influenced from concepts of other works, such as Gilgamesh, but one should still keep in mind that one did inevitably influence the other.Bibliography Works CitedThe Bible.Casselman, Linda Gilgamesh and Parallels to the Bible. 1 October 2000 . Clough, Brenda W. A Short Discussion of the Influence of the Gilgamesh Epic on the Bible. 3 July 1999. 1 October 2000. http://www.sff.net/people/Brenda/gilgam.htm.Sin-Leqi-Unninni. Gilgamesh. Trans. John Gardner and John Maier. New York; Vintage Books, 1985.Kneisler, Matthew Noahs Ark: The Story and Gilgamesh Epic. 1 October 2000. http://arksearch.com/nastory.htm#Gilgamesh Epic.Lorey, Frank. M.A. The Flood of Noah and the Flood of Gilgamesh. Vital Articles on Science/Creation. (March 1997). 1 October 2000 .