god) but one that created the world and left humanity to its own devices. This
is why in a growingly secular society Nietzsche could say that God is dead. If
there is no evidence to prove that god exists then how could he still be in
existence now. It is also said that Christians only believe in God as a security
blanket, a way of giving reason behind doing well in life. However Christianity
disagrees with that because they believe in a Trinitarian God consisting of the
Father (the creator) the son (the redeemer) and the holy spirit (the sustainer).
Since these 3 sections are all part of one God, if the world was created by a
division of the trinity, then the holy spirit must also be sustaining the world,
proving that God must still be alive. There is also proof although very little
of it is empirical, for example miracles that happen are believed apparitions of
God. The implications of this argument are that it seems that Nietzsche says
that because there is no empirical proof of God and because the world is now
becoming more secular and scientifically minded. I agree with this because it
seems that the only flaws with this theory is the size of the Christian faith
and scriptures such as the bible.
