Holy Communion

O

ften referred to as sharing analogous characteristics; the Roman Catholic Church alongside the Anglican Church share mutual teaching ground on the factors of Holy Communion. Even though they are two different denominations of a varied religion, both religions share the notion that Jesus was Christ, the anointed one, therefore concluding in the point that they believed Jesus was sent by God as our Saviour of sins and in that they both share no differentiation. By these churches proclaiming that it is in fact just that; holy; they are saying that it is something sacred, a privilege provided by Jesus to us and something which should remain sacred. The Holy Eucharist is the Sacrament which contains the body and blood, soul and divinity, of our Lord Jesus Christ under the appearances of bread and wine. Holy Communion express the idea that Christians are joined together in a community, with Christ, by sharing the bread and wine. The importance of the Eucharist lies as one of the main acts of worship for both Catholics and Anglicans. It is often celebrated at least once a week, every Sunday, and even in some cases; everyday.

The Eucharist derives from the Greek word for Thanksgiving. It is one of the only sacraments established by all Christians. A sacrament is a sacred ceremony which is a sign of Christ's presence in the Church and the lives of Christians. The Anglican accept only two sacraments; baptism and Eucharist, as these are the only two which have an indisputable foundation in the New Testament. The churches of the Catholic tradition accept these two plus five others. It is known under the following names: Eucharist, holy communion, the Lord's supper, the breaking of bread.

Christians differ in their views of the Eucharist however all correspond in that it is the sign of the new covenant devised between God and "his" followers. The old covenant between God and Israel was created when God freed the Hebrews from slavery in Egypt. They accepted God as their ruler in return for obeying his laws and becoming a people specially dedicated to him. The Hebrew people became a distinct community through this covenant. Without it they would have been absorbed into the Egyptian nation. The covenant was sealed with the Passover meal at which the Jews still smear their doorposts with the blood of the Pascal lamb which they had sacrificed that night. When the Israelites were in Egypt, they were slaves to Pharaoh, the King of Egypt. Moses told Pharaoh that he had to let the people go, for if he did not, Egypt would suffer a series of plagues. In the last of these plagues, an angel of death would come and kill the eldest son of every Egyptian family, but would pass over every Israelite home. One fundamentally important point is that at the Passover meal, a Jewish father reminds his children that they, not just their ancestors, were freed from slavery in Egypt by the Lord. The Passover is seen as a reliving of the deliverance from Egypt.

This is important for the Eucharist, for Christians believe that Christ is the new Pascal lamb. Just as the Pascal lamb was the sacrificial victim whose death marks the establishment of the old covenant, so Jesus is the lamb of God whose death atones for sin and seals the new covenant. In this new covenant people are freed from slavery to sin and are given the promise of eternal life. The community of the old covenant was Israel; the community of the new covenant is the church (all Christians) . The old covenant was with one nation, the new covenant is for all nations. The celebration meal of the new covenant is the Eucharist, at which Christians eat bread and drink wine as Jesus did at the Last Supper.
Join now!


While all Christians would agree on the above the different denominations now have different opinions about what happens at the service. The Roman Catholic and the Anglican church would argue that the bread and the wine mystically become the body and blood of Jesus (transubstantiation) and this led to claims of cannibalism for the early Christians. The Anglican tradition rejects this view on the grounds that Jesus made his sacrifice once and for all on the cross and cannot be sacrificed again, as he is now in glory. So the Eucharist is just in memory of this event ...

This is a preview of the whole essay