• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How successful is the teleological argument in proving the existence of God?

Extracts from this document...


1 How successful is the teleological argument in proving the existence of God? The question 'does God exist' has resulted in the formation of many arguments, complied by the worlds leading philosophers and theologians. These types of question are known as 'metaphysics', meaning after physics in relation to the position of the chapter dealing with metaphysics in Aristotle's book. These metaphysical question can be examined from every conceivable angle yet never be proven. The teleological argument is a 'posterior', an argument that uses human perception to prove the existence of God. The other form of argument is 'priori' which relies instead of logical reasoning and thought, the ontological argument falls into this category. This essay will attempt to evaluate whether the teleological argument is successful in its aim of proving the existence of the being we have come to know as God. The entity that philosophers attempt to astatine is the ultimate being, creator of the world and its inhabitants. The teleological argument was formed by William Paley in the 18th century. ...read more.


The world around us shows signs of order(weather patterns, tides), thus the world must have an intelligent maker. One strength of this argument is that the existence of God becomes necessary. Without a designer, humans cannot be designed, and therefore cannot exist. It also appeals to the human sense of logic, we would no more expect the components of a watch to by 'chance' fall into place and then function as an accurate timepiece; than we would expect a pig to fly. It is therefore logical that someone planned how the human body would work, how the tides would turn etc. Nevertheless there are also many weaknesses: evolution - the process by humans evolved from a single-celled organism - is more consistent with evidence. The existence of a designer is yet to be proved, however the theory of evolution has much evidence to suggest it may have occurred. Moreover, it has been suggested that our existence may have happened by 'chance'. The probability of chance would indicate that at some point, the various elements that make up this universe would fall together in the correct order. ...read more.


The designer has to be God, we cannot exist without 'its' design that allows us to function as we do daily. In conclusion it is clear that the existence of God is a highly debated issue. Paley stated that like a watch, humans must have a designer. Hume, like with the ontological, and cosmological has offered resistance claiming the jump between an organic and mechanistic object is too great. Yet, it is the opinion of many philosophers that Paley was a victim of his time. He complied this argument in the 18th century when a steam train was the most sophisticated technology available - he grew up during the Industrial Revolution where everything had a mechanical function. He had no concept of machines being able to adapt and change in accordance to their circumstances so it would be impossible for him to suggest it. His argument is therefore hindered by this. However, despite this lack of knowledge the teleological argument is very successful at proving the existence of God. It highlights that 'chance' played no part in the formulation of our universe, but that we are in the hands of a creator - known as God. Word Count 899 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Discuss the teleological argument for the existence of God. How viable is this argument?

    It would be utterly implausible to attribute the formation and assembling of these metal parts into a functioning machine to the chance operation of such factors as wind and rain. We are obliged to postulate an intelligent mind which is responsible for the phenomenon."

  2. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    * It maybe difficult to explain how this can make sense, as the objects in question are individual. His ideas here were that God cannot be proven or explained by comparing the world with the way a mechanical instrument is designed.

  1. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    Vardey uses the example of a lady 'He tells a woman who interrupted a lecture by a scientist on the origins of the universe saying that she knew better.

  2. Outline and evaluate the teleological argument for God's existence.

    Some argue the earth could not happen by chance. The probability of the 'Big Bang' creating a 'perfect world' is minuscule, 1 in a million. However, if we think of all the planets in our universes that are not sustaining life then it does not seem so improbable.

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    This also means that for any propositional statements to be true they must be verifiable, for example 'the cat is on the mat' is meaningful because we can verify it. When applied to the story we have to deduce that the gardener is meaningless because it is unverifiable.

  2. 'An analysis of arguments for the existence of God will result in valid philosophical ...

    Given this situation, it is reasonable to rely on reports of religious experience to tip the scales in favour of belief that God exists. However, I do not find this a convincing piece of reasoning because the existence of God is nothing to do with probability, and it is misleading to make it so.

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Hume (1711-1776) argued that although God could exist, he could also not exist, nothing necessarily exists and so even God is contingent, he rejected Anselm's argument purely on the basis that there was no such thing as necessary existence. Kant (1724-1804) also criticised Anselm's argument2 by arguing that the notion of existence is being treated as the wrong logical type.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    In order for this change to take place actuality is required. If not the object would have to initiate change itself, which is a logical impossibility. This is an impossibility because it would mean that the wood would be both potential and actual at the same time, how can wood make itself hot if it is hot already?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work