• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Is the Cosmological Argument a good argument?

Extracts from this document...


Is the Cosmological Argument a good argument? The cosmological argument is the way Thomas Aquinas proved the existence of God. He said that everything that is was caused by something before it. He also said that common sense shows that no object can create itself; some previous object would have had to create it. Aquinas believed that this string of cause and effect could not have gone on forever, and that there must be a First Cause, much like dominoes. But, the only problem with this was that this First Cause would have had to be uncaused, and therefore, is God, as God is uncaused. There are some strengths in this case, which sways people to believe in this argument. ...read more.


Another weakness is the fact that if God is self-explanatory, then the universe could also be self-explanatory. If it is possible for God to be a brute face, then it is also possible for the universe to just 'be'. There are many philosophers who have said that the universe just exists, or that the universe created itself, and Aquinas said that God just exists or that God created itself (depending on the interpretation), so couldn't it be possible for Aquinas's God and the universe to be one and the same? This argument technically states that 'something' created the universe, but that does not necessarily mean the God theists believe in created the world. ...read more.


Also, Aquinas exhibited a giant leap of faith when he said that God created the world, when all he technically proved was that 'something' created the world. I do not agree with this because, to make me believe in this argument, I need hard facts, not leaps of faith. Even though I acknowledge the fact that there are some aspects of this argument that are true and do have hard evidence, such as the fact that everything was caused by something else, I can also see that I would need more evidence to put my faith fully into what Thomas Aquinas said. Therefore, in answer to the question originally posed at the beginning of this essay, I do not believe this argument is a good argument as it is contradictory, it has most of its proof in faith than fact, and it was not made with an open mind. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    and that the universe started by random movement of particles and by the Big Bang. The theory provides a scientific explanation to the beginning of the universe and can be used in favor of or against the cosmological argument. Was the Big Bang caused by a spontaneous random event, or by a deliberate action by God?

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    Therefore, there must be a cause of everything in the universe which is outside of it. This cause must be a self-explanatory being i.e. one which contains within itself the reason for its own existence. A necessary being that causes everything to come into being.

  1. Deconstructing O'Connor's "A Good Man Is Hard to Find".

    He's going to be into everything". In fact, the Misfit seems to have been through everything-from a gospel singer to a murderer. Unlike the Misfit, the grandmother never questions the mechanics of the universe-to ask herself why things are. This default puts the Misfit several cuts above the grandmother, who is just "afraid to miss something" and would rather choose to 'settle down'.

  2. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    universe came to its present state of order by chance, it is much more probable that there it is the result of a design. If it is design then God is the simplest explanation. This is indeed a strong argument because probabilities cannot be argued with because it is the individual's preference to decide what is probable.

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    Everything in the universe exists in an actual state (the actus) however Aquinas argues that everything has the potential (the potentia) to become something else. What is needed to turn it from its actual to potential state is a changer (the motus).

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    The statement and resolution of this problem leads to the third aspect of big bang cosmology that is pertinent to my argument. (iii) Friedmann's solutions are based on the assumption that the universe is perfectly isotropic and homogeneous. But this assumption is inconsistent with observational evidence, which reveals the universe

  1. Critique of Aquinas's cosmological argument - 3rd way(Contingency)

    Also, the nature of contingency is questioned by the argument that matter is eternal which thus contradicts Aquinas, as will be shown below. If matter is eternal then it must always have existed and thus is a brute fact and needs no explanation.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Supporters of the Kalam argument argue that it was a deliberate action of God because the rules of nature have existed since the beginning of time, it could not have possibly been the result of a spontaneous event, and it must be because of God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work