• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juveniles vs. Capital Punishment

Extracts from this document...


Christian S. Watkins English T-122 Jeff Chan November 27, 2001 Juveniles vs. Capital Punishment Capital punishment has always been a controversial topic that could be debated until the end of time. However, a new element of the issue has taken the center stage of the legal world that has diverted focus to the Supreme Court. The factor whether it is appropriate for the death penalty to be imposed on juvenile offenders is now debated in courtrooms all over the nation. Although the American public is generally in favor of the death penalty, surveys indicate that a substantial majority oppose capital punishment for minors. Only 24 of the 50 states now allow the execution of juveniles, and nationwide there are 28 juvenile killers on death row (SpeakOut.com). The reasoning behind both arguments (for and against) is based upon solid facts and ideas that leave you deliberating the pros and cons of capital punishment. Obviously, there is no clear winner in this debate as well as it is still being weighed in the minds of not only the public but the courts as well. ...read more.


Finally, it is the responsibility of individual states not the Supreme Court to decide what punishments are acceptable for juveniles - if the citizens of a state want the death penalty for juveniles found guilty of certain adult crimes, their state legislators should be able to make that law. In a society where crime and violence are a part of everyday life, it is customary that citizens would want justice even in the form of revenge. Others, however, argue that the death penalty is an inappropriate punishment for minors. Young people are not yet hardened criminals; they can still be rehabilitated. Some of the more forceful arguments against the death penalty include the death penalty being morally wrong. A society that believes it must kill people in order to solve its problems is an uncivilized society. If we were truly a civil society, we would work our hardest to overcome the problems that we face rather than using the quick-fix method of simply killing someone. ...read more.


This too, has changed. Today, some judges and legislators are eager to permit children to be put to death. Personally, I feel that the death penalty is a hard decision that faces not only our government but also our society. While as a society we cry out for justice when one of us has something wrong done to us, I am not sure if revenge by death is an acceptable solution. We as a county make it illegal to kill someone but yet we reserve the right to impose death if we feel the crime is vicious? I feel the death penalty is morally wrong in any circumstances. I do not think that it deters crime or instills fear in the criminal. I think that juveniles can be responsible for their actions and crime with out having to give their life. I believe that juveniles can be rehabilitated and that society should not give up so easily. The chance to redeem themselves and to turn around their life should be given, and with the right support, I believe that they can learn from the experience and move on to be productive part of society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Crime and Punishment in the Elizabethan Age.

    In some cases the pillory was combined with a whipping post and stocks to make a one stop, public punishment device. Also among the list of Elizabethan punishment methods was the stocks. The stocks were similar to the pillory in that a part of the body was locked between two

  2. Important aspects of capital punishment are the methods of execution, costs, and the pros ...

    slight, so the process needs to be expedited up to make the death penalty a more effective deterrent. Deterrence is defined as the punishment fitting the crime. The racial bias issue is more difficult to argue. One might say that it is because there are more minorities that commit crimes.

  1. Capital Punishment

    But the problem with act utilitarianism is the fact that it has the potential to justify virtually any act if, in that case the result generates the most happiness. Also its impractical to suggest we should measure each and every moral choice every time, especially as we may not have

  2. Capital Punishment, is it an effective or ineffective deterrent?

    then duration of his sentence is in the region of �18-20 million. Our resources would be better spent on the old, the young and the sick rather than the long term imprisonment of murderers, rapists etc. It is obvious that dead criminals can not commit any further crimes, either within prison or after being released from it.

  1. Capital Punishment Vs Right to Life

    For Christians life is a gift from God and no one but him has a right to take it. Their belief in compassion and forgiveness is what subordinates the idea of capital punishment. In fact Jesus once stated in the Bible; "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute

  2. Explain, by reference to decided cases, how the courts have approached the requirement of ...

    victim was in fear of being physically hurt and it was this fear that had caused him to try and escape and consequently meet his death. It was made clear that the conduct had to be of an unlawful nature and also one which any reasonable person would forsee as having risk of some harm.

  1. In this philosophical study of applied ethics the concept of punishment will be argued ...

    The deterrence argument is classically the lynchpin of utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) in the principles of penal law argues that * Punishment is not necessary if the offence will not recur; * Punishment is only appropriate to dissuade other from behaving in the same way; * Punishment is, therefore, to protect society for the future.

  2. Capital punishment as a deterrent of capital crimes in America

    Capital Punishment as Cruel and Unusual Punishment Constitutionalists argue that the death penalty violates the "cruel and unusual" clause of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In the 1910 case, Weems v. United States, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a sentence of prison time and a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work