• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Juveniles vs. Capital Punishment

Extracts from this document...


Christian S. Watkins English T-122 Jeff Chan November 27, 2001 Juveniles vs. Capital Punishment Capital punishment has always been a controversial topic that could be debated until the end of time. However, a new element of the issue has taken the center stage of the legal world that has diverted focus to the Supreme Court. The factor whether it is appropriate for the death penalty to be imposed on juvenile offenders is now debated in courtrooms all over the nation. Although the American public is generally in favor of the death penalty, surveys indicate that a substantial majority oppose capital punishment for minors. Only 24 of the 50 states now allow the execution of juveniles, and nationwide there are 28 juvenile killers on death row (SpeakOut.com). The reasoning behind both arguments (for and against) is based upon solid facts and ideas that leave you deliberating the pros and cons of capital punishment. Obviously, there is no clear winner in this debate as well as it is still being weighed in the minds of not only the public but the courts as well. ...read more.


Finally, it is the responsibility of individual states not the Supreme Court to decide what punishments are acceptable for juveniles - if the citizens of a state want the death penalty for juveniles found guilty of certain adult crimes, their state legislators should be able to make that law. In a society where crime and violence are a part of everyday life, it is customary that citizens would want justice even in the form of revenge. Others, however, argue that the death penalty is an inappropriate punishment for minors. Young people are not yet hardened criminals; they can still be rehabilitated. Some of the more forceful arguments against the death penalty include the death penalty being morally wrong. A society that believes it must kill people in order to solve its problems is an uncivilized society. If we were truly a civil society, we would work our hardest to overcome the problems that we face rather than using the quick-fix method of simply killing someone. ...read more.


This too, has changed. Today, some judges and legislators are eager to permit children to be put to death. Personally, I feel that the death penalty is a hard decision that faces not only our government but also our society. While as a society we cry out for justice when one of us has something wrong done to us, I am not sure if revenge by death is an acceptable solution. We as a county make it illegal to kill someone but yet we reserve the right to impose death if we feel the crime is vicious? I feel the death penalty is morally wrong in any circumstances. I do not think that it deters crime or instills fear in the criminal. I think that juveniles can be responsible for their actions and crime with out having to give their life. I believe that juveniles can be rehabilitated and that society should not give up so easily. The chance to redeem themselves and to turn around their life should be given, and with the right support, I believe that they can learn from the experience and move on to be productive part of society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Capital punishment as a deterrent of capital crimes in America

    identifications are made; those who wield the power of life and death itself- the police officer, the witness, the prosecutor, the juror, and even the judge become overzealous". Retentionists maintain that there are legal safeguards built into the system to ensure that the innocent are not executed.

  2. In this philosophical study of applied ethics the concept of punishment will be argued ...

    Is it just to punish them the same way? The retributive aim of punishment has not been in fashion in modern western societies because of utilitarian and new form of Christians, it is seen as a barbaric and uncompassionate. Despite the problems of the retributive aim, there is still something

  1. Capital punishment is no longer practised in our society. Explain what differing Christian attitudes ...

    way and loved her, not in a patronising and disgusted way that the other people of that time did. Jesus teaches Christians to take compassion on others, so by killing the criminals, you are taking compassion on the victim's family.

  2. Capital Punishment Vs Right to Life

    For Christians life is a gift from God and no one but him has a right to take it. Their belief in compassion and forgiveness is what subordinates the idea of capital punishment. In fact Jesus once stated in the Bible; "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute

  1. Capital Punishment, is it an effective or ineffective deterrent?

    history of torture, and Alessandro was an official at a Milan prison had first hand experience of the prison's appalling conditions. In On Crimes and Punishments Beccaria presents one of the first sustained critiques of the use of capital punishment.

  2. Crime and Punishment in the Elizabethan Age.

    If left in for any length of time. Finger pillories often went by the name of finger stocks and were routinely used in upper class halls to punish the disorderly during social gatherings.

  1. Explain, by reference to decided cases, how the courts have approached the requirement of ...

    victim was in fear of being physically hurt and it was this fear that had caused him to try and escape and consequently meet his death. It was made clear that the conduct had to be of an unlawful nature and also one which any reasonable person would forsee as having risk of some harm.

  2. Debate about the use of the death penalty for juveniles.

    Advocates assure that by executing murderers it prevents them from murdering again and, thereby, do save innocent life. Supporters say this is proven when it is "[estimated] that convicted criminals free on parole and probation [. . .] commit 'at least' 84,800 violent crimes every year, including 13,200 murders [...]" (Sharp).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work