Juveniles vs. Capital Punishment

Authors Avatar
Christian S. Watkins

English T-122

Jeff Chan

November 27, 2001

Juveniles vs. Capital Punishment

Capital punishment has always been a controversial topic that could be debated until the end of time. However, a new element of the issue has taken the center stage of the legal world that has diverted focus to the Supreme Court. The factor whether it is appropriate for the death penalty to be imposed on juvenile offenders is now debated in courtrooms all over the nation. Although the American public is generally in favor of the death penalty, surveys indicate that a substantial majority oppose capital punishment for minors. Only 24 of the 50 states now allow the execution of juveniles, and nationwide there are 28 juvenile killers on death row (SpeakOut.com). The reasoning behind both arguments (for and against) is based upon solid facts and ideas that leave you deliberating the pros and cons of capital punishment. Obviously, there is no clear winner in this debate as well as it is still being weighed in the minds of not only the public but the courts as well.
Join now!


Usually the punishments for juvenile offenders are less severe in a hope that they can be rehabilitated and returned as a productive part of society. However, in a time where juvenile offenses are becoming more violent, more active in gangs, with guns and where drugs are more prevalent: the courts are becoming less tolerant of youth offenders. The US Supreme Court has upheld the use of the death penalty for youths over sixteen. There are many arguments that support the use of the death penalty for juveniles. For one, the death penalty is the correct punishment for the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay