• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Philosophical problems created by suffering for a religious believer.

Extracts from this document...


One of the most major problems with belief in a God is reconciling this belief with all the suffering in the world. Religion believes in a God who is all-powerful and all loving (omnipotent, omniscient and benevolent). So a great problem is raised when looking at the way the world has so much suffering, some of it on an overwhelming scale and depth. Suffering comes as a result of two evils: * That caused by Natural Evils - caused by the environment/world. Things such as the effects of natural hazards such as earthquakes and tropical storms that cause mass death and destruction. * That caused by Moral Evils - caused by man. Things such as war, holocaust, murder and other crimes. The problems created by suffering are often generalised as 'The Problem of Evil'. This issue of evil and suffering causes philosophical problems for a religious believer because it logically seems impossible to believe in the existence of a good and powerful God on the basis of the existence of evil and suffering in the world. The basic idea is: * A good God would want to destroy evil, and stop suffering. ...read more.


Swinburne took the example of 'death', and argued that, despite the suffering it causes, it is never the less essential to freewill defence. This is because death means that life, and the chances that each life contains, are limited. But there are a number of problems with this freewill defence argument. First of all, it is hard to see how God's creation went so wrong if God created it perfect. As the philosopher Schleiermacher pointed out, the evil must have come from somewhere, but if God created the whole world, including us, perfect (as was clearly possible for an omnipotent being, and as Augustine claims) there could be no way for it to have gone wrong. Secondly, and most importantly, Augustine's argument has simply been superceded by science. Volcanoes have been on the surface of the earth for millions of years before humans ever emerged and are governed by natural laws that neither know nor care that they cause human suffering. The blind, uncaring nature of these natural laws and of nature generally make this look very unlike the sort of world God would create. And of course Adam and Eve never existed, so there was no original sin. ...read more.


Also, a big flaw in Irenaeus's model is how hundreds of earlier generations have had to go through much suffering so that later generations can achieve the perfection he thinks they ultimately will. This leads onto a broader flaw in both this theodicy and the main free will defence. Both of these assume that humans can eventually reach a state of high (maximum) goodness, where they always choose to do good out of their own free will. If this is the case, then why couldn't God have created us this way to start with? It would obviously be possible, and just a matter of duplicating the sort of humans we are bound to eventually achieve. It could be thought that the journey is more valuable than the actual arrival, but can the value of passing through a period of suffering actually be shown or pointed out It is difficult to see how a common saying about anticipation of something can justify millions of human deaths in events like the Holocaust. The concluding question is; Have these events really achieved something which balances out the atrocities/tragedies involved? While it is possible for good to come out of suffering, equally good people can come out of thinking, sensitivity and a good upbringing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Good and Evil

    In Romans chapter 7, an apostle writes that even as Christians, we still have to struggle with our old sinful nature. So he wrote, "I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my sinful nature, for I have the desire to do what is good" (Rom 7:18-19).

  2. Present the strengths and weaknesses of Augustine's and Ireneaus' theodicy

    Irenaeus, Against Heresies iv, xxxix.1. By God creating humans and taking the chance to give them the choice of having free will or genuine freedom willingly humans cannot therefore say that God should have never let evil happen on earth.

  1. Persuasive Writing on the Holocaust

    When his friend asked for a sip he refused to give it to him. Eventually his friend died because he had been to hot and had no water. This was his regret and this was what he considered not to be a man.

  2. What do religious believers mean by the 'problem of suffering?' Select any two ...

    An important question raised is why God created hell. It implies the anticipation of evil to follow. The anticipation therefore of its imperfection. The creation of heaven, contrarily, along with the second chance he gave us through Jesus, demonstrates God's irrational inconsistency. Although Augustine's theory goes some way to justify God's reasons for allowing suffering it has many irregularities

  1. Christianity - Ideas on suffering

    This is more of the focus, than is the Christian focus on the free will of others. Evil doers are not let go as easy as the New Testament would allow, but they also serve the will of God. The Islamic Satan was left "without God" Qur'an: And surely, We created you (your father Adam)

  2. Logical Positivism and the Meaninglessness of Religious Language.

    Do the stranger's apparently unfriendly acts count decisively against the favourable evidence?[6] Apparently things unworthy of a good and all-powerful God, such as unexplained evil and suffering, do not count decisively against a loving God's existence, for the believer believes that she has sufficient evidence for God's reality and goodness.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Swinburne took the example of death, and argued that despite its suffering, it is nevertheless essential to the freewill defence. This is because death means that the chances that each life contained are limited. This is essential because only a limited lifespan means we are genuinely responsible for our actions.

  2. How you fit into Gods life Story

    if it were fact, this is because the repetition would become very monotonous, and will require what I view to be unnecessary effort.) God is not perfect, not entirely good nor evil, but with his own personality. At first (how there can be a first for God will be explained, don't worry,)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work