• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

qanselms ontological argument

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A) Explain Why Anselm's Ontological Argument Concludes That God Has To Exist. The Ontological Argument is an example of an a-priori argument. It attempts to prove God's existence by understanding the definition of God. An a-priori proof is analytic and deductive proofs. They are based on premises which are not drawn from worldly experiences but are logically necessary. A logically necessary statement consists of premises and a conclusion which is absolute (certain). It can not be disputed unlike inductive proofs from which many conclusions can be drawn that are either weak, reasonable or strong. Examples of a logically necessary statement are mathematical statements (i.e. 1+1=2) and tautologies (like 'all spinsters are female'). The ontological proof is the basis of Anselm's argument to prove God's existence. According to Anselm the term 'God' contains everything we need to know about God including the fact of his existence. Anselm defines God as 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'. If we recognize this definition to be true and believe it is a tautology than we must accept that God possesses all perfections and therefore his existence is necessary as something is only greater when it exists in reality than if it does not. ...read more.

Middle

Descartes supports Anselm as he believes that existence was a necessary predicate of God as it is illogical to say that God does not exist when it is believed that he contains every possible perfection. He acknowledged that it was impossible to have a God without recognising his existence in the same way it was impossible to imagine a triangle without its three sides and angles. To conclude, Anselm's ontological argument proves that God exists, as you accept that God is 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived' therefore it is inconceivable that God cannot exist and that it is logically necessary for his existence. B) Anselm's Ontological Argument Is Wrong. Discuss. At the time when Anselm had proposed the argument everybody believed in a God and there were not many atheists around. The Ontological Argument demands that we believe the definition of God as 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'. At that time no one disagreed with this as they all believed in a God and understood that the conclusion was analytic (a-priori) ...read more.

Conclusion

Except Anselm responds by saying that you can either have a triangle or not but since God is necessary you simply cannot have no God. Also, Gaunilo claims that if Anselm's argument was true than his idea of a perfect island for example an island with trees, a waterfall, elves and golden grass must have to exist; except this is not necessarily true as there in no perfect island like he suggests in reality. Anselm rejects this as he believes an island is contingent and doesn't need to exist but God is necessary and is unique as it can not be thought of as non existent. On the whole, Anselm's ontological argument is considered to be wrong because he believes that it is a deductive proof which is analytic and a-priori when actually it is inductive as not everyone believes in God or the fact that God is 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'. For it to be deductive you should be unable to dispute the conclusion drawn from the premises, however since Kant and Gaunilo have challenged Anselm's argument from which the conclusion can be doubted then it is wrong. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nasima Begum FE09 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Thus, maximal greatness entails existence in every possible world: since a being that is maximally great at W is omnipotent at every possible world and non-existent beings can't be omnipotent, it follows that a maximally great being exists in every logically possible world.

  2. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    God does not exist, (2) God does not want to or (3) God can't give you this evidence. Due to the ontological evidence, alternative (2) and (3) may not be worth your worship and thus they equal alternative (1). So if you get no response there may not be a God.

  1. "The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence"

    However, we know that this perfect island does not exist, and therefore the logic fails to prove God's argument. We cannot simply jump from the possibility of this island's existence to its actual existence just by insisting existence would make the island more 'perfect'.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    This is a syllogism. Russell is saying that existence is not a property of things but the idea of those things. Malcolm argues that stating God possess necessary existence means to conclude logically and acceptably that God must exist.

  1. The ontological argument

    Descarte said in Meditation V; 'From the fact that I cannot conceive of God without existence, it follows that existence is inseparable from him, and hence that he really exists.' Therefore it is concluded that a man who questions the existence of God isn't describing God because of the necessity of Gods' existence.

  2. The ontological argument

    To reverse the statement, saying that God does not exist, would be contradictory, because this would be saying that God lacks existence, but if He does not exist, how can He lack anything? There are also some more recent additions to the Ontological argument.

  1. The Ontological Argument.

    Once he has painted it he has it in his thoughts and thinks that it exists because he has done it... And certainly that greater than which cannot be understood cannot exist only in thought, for if it exists only in thought it could also be thought of existing in reality as well, which is greater.

  2. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    of the Universe, and that chance is a good explanation for the infinitely small window of opportunity within which the universe exists and permits life is undermined by the degree of probability against it. I. David Hume's objection against the inductive nature of the argument does however still stand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work