• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

qanselms ontological argument

Extracts from this document...


A) Explain Why Anselm's Ontological Argument Concludes That God Has To Exist. The Ontological Argument is an example of an a-priori argument. It attempts to prove God's existence by understanding the definition of God. An a-priori proof is analytic and deductive proofs. They are based on premises which are not drawn from worldly experiences but are logically necessary. A logically necessary statement consists of premises and a conclusion which is absolute (certain). It can not be disputed unlike inductive proofs from which many conclusions can be drawn that are either weak, reasonable or strong. Examples of a logically necessary statement are mathematical statements (i.e. 1+1=2) and tautologies (like 'all spinsters are female'). The ontological proof is the basis of Anselm's argument to prove God's existence. According to Anselm the term 'God' contains everything we need to know about God including the fact of his existence. Anselm defines God as 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'. If we recognize this definition to be true and believe it is a tautology than we must accept that God possesses all perfections and therefore his existence is necessary as something is only greater when it exists in reality than if it does not. ...read more.


Descartes supports Anselm as he believes that existence was a necessary predicate of God as it is illogical to say that God does not exist when it is believed that he contains every possible perfection. He acknowledged that it was impossible to have a God without recognising his existence in the same way it was impossible to imagine a triangle without its three sides and angles. To conclude, Anselm's ontological argument proves that God exists, as you accept that God is 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived' therefore it is inconceivable that God cannot exist and that it is logically necessary for his existence. B) Anselm's Ontological Argument Is Wrong. Discuss. At the time when Anselm had proposed the argument everybody believed in a God and there were not many atheists around. The Ontological Argument demands that we believe the definition of God as 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'. At that time no one disagreed with this as they all believed in a God and understood that the conclusion was analytic (a-priori) ...read more.


Except Anselm responds by saying that you can either have a triangle or not but since God is necessary you simply cannot have no God. Also, Gaunilo claims that if Anselm's argument was true than his idea of a perfect island for example an island with trees, a waterfall, elves and golden grass must have to exist; except this is not necessarily true as there in no perfect island like he suggests in reality. Anselm rejects this as he believes an island is contingent and doesn't need to exist but God is necessary and is unique as it can not be thought of as non existent. On the whole, Anselm's ontological argument is considered to be wrong because he believes that it is a deductive proof which is analytic and a-priori when actually it is inductive as not everyone believes in God or the fact that God is 'that than which nothing greater can be conceived'. For it to be deductive you should be unable to dispute the conclusion drawn from the premises, however since Kant and Gaunilo have challenged Anselm's argument from which the conclusion can be doubted then it is wrong. ?? ?? ?? ?? Nasima Begum FE09 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. "The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence"

    However, we know that this perfect island does not exist, and therefore the logic fails to prove God's argument. We cannot simply jump from the possibility of this island's existence to its actual existence just by insisting existence would make the island more 'perfect'.

  2. Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

    Immanuel Kant argued that 'existence is not a predicate' - it isn't a great making quality, and does not really 'add' anything to what is being described. This claim therefore means that the premise is false, making the conclusion false, and the argument invalid.

  1. The ontological argument

    Kant argues that it is possible to accept that a proposal is true by definition (the subject and predicate of the proposition are inseparable) and yet the subject doesn't refer to anything in this world. There are inseparable predicates that when taken from the concept of the subject cease to

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    things (e.g., God).'21 If the physical universe is created by God then it has its explanation in God and consequently does not exist unexplained; in this case, only God exists unexplained. Since the hypothesis that only God exists unexplained is simpler than the atheistic hypothesis, it is more likely to be true.

  1. "The Ontological Argument is a logical sleight of hand." Discuss

    However, an analogy compares two things, and they must have some sort of common ground in order for the comparison to work. Many people would therefore argue that analogies in the ontological argument are meaningless, because you cannot realistically compare God with anything we can relate to, since he is beyond our understanding.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Therefore Gaunillo criticisms do not withhold the strength of Anselm's argument. Kant opposed Descartes version of the ontological argument. He stated that Gods existence is tantamount to denying triangles have three sides. As if one denies the idea of the triangle (subject)

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    The idea here is that, since different people have different concepts of God, this argument works, if at all, only to convince those who define the notion of God in the same way. On Aquinas's view, even if we assume that everyone shares the same concept of God as a

  2. The Ontological Argument

    If he does exist he cannot have come into existence nor can he cease to exist as nothing could cause him to exist nor could anything cause him to cease to exist. So, if God exists his existence is necessary.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work