Religion in the workplace: implications for managers.

Authors Avatar

Religion in the workplace: implications for managers.

Here it comes again: the annual debate about whether a crehe or a decorated evergreen is an appropriate public symbol in December and whether the office party Should have a Christmas theme.

America has assiduously tried to keep religion off the factory floor and out of the office--even as her citizens have continued to invoke God at baseball games, courtroom trials and sessions of Congress. We removed prayer from our nation's public schools several decades ago; now we are contemplating restoring it. In fact, some alternative schools exist today to counter the lack of religious expression in the public classroom.

In at least one prominent case, religion co-exists effortlessly with public life: President Bill Clinton has become a remarkable National Griever in a nonsectarian way, at ease with religious expression in and out of the White House. He played a role during times of national tragedy recently, comforting families and attending services in the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing, the TWA Flight 800 tragedy and the plane crash in Eastern Europe that took the lives of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, corporate executives and government workers.

America may characterize itself as a religious nation but, if so, it has a white Anglo-Saxon Protestant, stiff-upper-lip heritage that tends to be uncomfortable with emotion or religious fervor outside of a prescribed circle. Public expressions of Bible Belt evangelism and Eastern religions' rituals can cause controversy. Public display of religious symbols has also raised concern over separation of church and state.

The workplace is no exception. We still struggle with the role religion and religious observance play in our everyday work lives. A Denver' Nuggets player was suspended by the National Basketball Association earlier this year after he refused to stand for the national anthem. Among other reasons, he cited his religious beliefs for his actions. A Wal-Mart employee sued the retailer, charging that he was forced to resign after refusing to work on Sunday, his holy day. Wal-Mart disputed the charge, but agreed to change its human resources policies and to conduct thorough training to prevent religious discrimination in its stores.

Consider these two other examples:

Two women were fired for refusing to work at a Massachusetts racetrack on Christmas evening because they celebrated it as a religious holiday. The women sued the company on the grounds of religious freedom, citing a recently enacted state law protecting individuals to be free from work on days of religious observance. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld the firings and ruled the law unconstitutional. The court said it required government to make theological judgments about religious law and practice, which violated the concept of separation of church and state. The Massachusetts Legislature is reworking the statute.

Join now!

Three executives at Briggs & Stratton Corp., a small-engine manufacturer in Wisconsin, have sued The National Catholic Reporter for $30 million. The men have charged the leading religious newsweekly with libel and invasion of privacy because it had written in 1994 that, as Roman Catholics, the managers exhibited "either denial or moral blindness" when they went ahead with a planned move to shift 2,000 unionized jobs from the Milwaukee area to nonunion plants in the South. Legal experts have said the lawsuit has little merit. But the executives have asserted they will pursue the action because it is a ...

This is a preview of the whole essay