• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Styal Mill - "The Gregs had a genuine concern for the welfare of their apprentices". Do the visual, documentary and oral sources support this view?

Extracts from this document...


3. "The Gregs had a genuine concern for the welfare of their apprentices". Do the visual, documentary and oral sources support this view? The Gregs had very genuine concern for the welfare and well being at Styal Mill. Several of the visual, documentary and oral sources support this view very strongly, and show us that because of this concern for the well being of their apprentices, the Gregs went out of their way to give them the best possible life at the mill. The Gregs were very religious as a family, mainly due to Samuel Greg marrying Hannah Lightbody, who was a Unitarian. She soon converted Samuel to Unitarianism, and in 1823, Samuel built Norcliffe Chapel in Styal. Before this was built, the apprentices at the mill had to walk to St. Bartholomew's for church on a Sunday. Something which the Gregs did not use at Styal was corporal punishment. When questioned by the Factory Commissioners in 1834, Samuel Greg told them that apprentices received "barely beyond a box on the ear, to call attention". He also told them that corporal punishment was never used at Styal. There is also no sign of corporal punishment being used at Styal in the records kept there, but this does not mean that it definitely did not happen. ...read more.


These conditions are far greater then those of other mills around the country. Samuel Greg's punishments were tame in comparison to some. Robert Blincoe, from Litton Mill in Derbyshire said "I have seen the time when two handle of a pound weight have been screwed to my ears...", "Mr Needham was in the habit of knocking down apprentices with his clenched fists..." and "three or four of us have been hung on a cross beam above the machinery, hanging by our hands...". Elizabeth Bentley told a parliamentary committee that in Leeds Mill, they were "strapped" and that the girls had "black marks on their skin". However, it is believed that the amount of corporal punishment in mills has been exaggerated to improve conditions for children, so the reliability of these sources from Robert Blincoe and Elizabeth Bentley is debateable. The Education in other mills was also poor in comparison to Styal's. Even though the 1802 Health and Morals of Apprentices Act was passed, it was not fully enforced, and often ignored. One mill owner found a way around the law, by having his apprentices "educated", by an illiterate man who stoked the boilers. The apprentices at Styal were also very well fed. When speaking to Middlesex Magistrates Court, both Thomas Priestley and Joseph Sefton told of a good diet, consisting of dishes like lob scouse, bread, porridge and bacon. ...read more.


Greg also educated his children very well, and although it is difficult to see, he may have had an ulterior motive for this too. Literate people were seen as better then others. If he had children who could all read and write, it would make them better mannered and would give them something to fill their time with when they weren't working, giving them less chance to cause trouble. It seems more likely that Samuel Greg had a genuine concern for his apprentices then for his overall earnings as mill owner, despite their being several possibilities that say otherwise. Most of the negative sides to his treatment of the apprentices are supposition, and therefore can be discounted as evidence against Greg. Some sources can also be discounted as evidence supporting the statement "The Gregs had a genuine concern for the welfare of their apprentices", due to the reliability of it. Some of the sources comparing Styal to other mills around the country could be exaggerated, and some of the testimony of Sefton and Priestley could also be discounted, but again, this is supposition. The work Greg did for the apprentices outweighs these minor factors, such as building the church and employing Doctor Holland, so despite any ulterior motives he had to treating his apprentices so well, it is proven that they did lead good lives for young mill workers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Analysing a documentary called "14 Days in May".

    on them as it mentally tortures the criminal put on death row and their families as well. And an Inmate of EEJ tells us that: "Starting to realise tat it is going to happen ............ fear as you wait in line for it to happen".

  2. Analyse a media text documentary film called 14 days in May.

    At one stage there was a part in the documentary where there was officers playing with guns in front of prisoners, they show us this because it is how they show there power over the prisoners and how they don't care what happens to them.

  1. Essay: how does Peter Medak gain the viewers sympathy for Derek Bentley in the ...

    was rejected just because he has epileptic fits and this was not seen as discrimination during this time period. Derek falls out with Craig and he fells he has make it up to him Derek achieves this by stealing the keys to the butchers shop.

  2. How does Peter Medak gain the viewers sympathy for Derek Bentley in the film ...

    Derek's father shows his disapproval of Derek's new friends and asks Derek about his change in clothes and hairstyle. We can tell from this that his father is worried and concerned for Derek and we share his father's concerns. When Craig and Bentley are on the roof, where they commit

  1. In this philosophical study of applied ethics the concept of punishment will be argued ...

    As an alternative to the biblical objectivity Kant's philosophical argument - Philosophy of Law attempts to provide a non-metaphysical but universal argument justification for the retributive argument which for legal capital punishment. Kant rules out any reformative or deterrent aims of punishment in the first instance, an offender is punished because he has committed a crime and deserves it.

  2. My View Of Authority

    and saving the boy as they weren't insured for this. In this case it was morally wrong for them to just stand around watching even though the law was against it they should have done everything humanely possible to save the child instead of getting ridiculed for not helping in everyway that they could.

  1. What evidence is there to support the claim that Don Delillo is a disturbing ...

    Death becomes the other. Everywhere life is death must be. This is clearly demonstrated in the novel, throughout there is constant harbingers of death, the disasters on the television, the Airborne Toxic Event, even in the supermarket Jack notes the constant roar of waves and radiation, the white noise that

  2. Capital Punishment Sources Question

    The punishment of being hanged drawn and quartered was the most spectacular of them all. The accused would be dragged to the gallows, as he is not worthy to walk the ground of the sewers, alone the streets he shared with others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work