• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Death Penalty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Death Penalty The death penalty is the hardest punishment that a convicted person can get. This kind of penalty can end the life of the punished person in two ways. The first way is by using intravenous injection of a toxic fluid, which is made specially for the purpose of killing human beings. Another way in which the death penalty can end the existence of the punished person is by using the electric chair. Since the death penalty is the hardest punishment that leads to the termination of a life of the sentenced person, it is sentenced for horrible murders some of which are killing children or rapes. However, the death penalty should be abolished, and human beings should not be killed under any circumstances. In my opinion, there are three main reasons for the abolishment of this punishment: innocent people are sometimes killed, it costs a lot of money and killing is ethically wrong. The first reason why the death penalty should be abolished is that there is a possibility for innocent people to be executed for crimes that they did not commit. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore, the death penalty wastes government resources that could be used to increase security of our society. The increased number of police officers, for instance, could help in prevention of crime that would increase security. Moreover, those resources would increase security without killing people. The third, and probably the most important reason for the abolishment of the death penalty is simply the fact that killing is morally and ethically wrong. How can a murder be punished by another murder? It is true that everyone gets what he or she deserves, but it should not be the case when it is about taking somebody's life. After all, God is the only one who gives life and he is the only one who has the right to take the life. Why would any judge play the role of God? Moreover, there are no other species in the world that purposely kills members of the same specie; why should the human race be an exception? Although I oppose death penalty, I think that sending murderers to ordinary jail is not well balanced with what they did. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is true that this punishment brings relief to families of victims, but it brings no good to the society as a whole. In addition, those who are in favor of death penalty think that this punishment can be used as a big warning to future criminals. When they see that the government is capable of handling that kind of punishment, they will think twice before committing a similar crime. However, the government and the representatives of justice should not behave in an unethically wrong and violent way, because their role is to fight those who act in that manner. To conclude, the death penalty should be abolished because there is no justifiable reason for killing a human being. If the death penalty is not abolished, these legal killings are going to continue. Although there is a difference between killing an innocent person and a convicted murderer, the final outcome is the same, and that is death. Since God is the only one who gives life and who has the right to take the life, nobody should be allowed to steal the human life. Therefore, murderers should be punished in cruel manners, but they should not be executed. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Death Penalty Opinion.

    A lot of people are all for the death penalty, but what if it were you child, would you be able to watch them send eletricity through his body, or inject pioson in them. Maybe having chemicals flood their lungs as they fight to breathe.

  2. Critically evaluate arguments for and against the death penalty.

    The Pro-death penalty view therefore agrees, that according to the 8th Amendment, the punishment must fit the crime, which they believe it does. Through time, most of the types of execution would have been seen as unusual and cruel but it has been argued that the lethal injection is no

  1. Death Penalty - Should it be abolished?

    Obviously any human would choose to live in a safe world. Consider life in countries where the death penalty is a way of executing convicted criminals.

  2. maths data handling

    found that my 1st hypothesis agreed with the results of the diagrams, though the results were very similar for both Genders. From my statistics box we can see just how close the results were, leading me on to my next hypothesis to help me determine why this is Hypothesis 2:

  1. Religions and thier opinion on life after death.

    There are three different types of Jews orthodox liberal and reform. They all have their own opinion on life after death. The main differences in the beliefs are the way in which the dead body is treated. Orthodox Jews believe that the physical body will be resurrected at the end of the Messianic age.

  2. Speed Kills.

    While fatalities continue on Britain's road, Paul Kerr will continue campaigning. One death on the road is still one too many. * On a global scale, cars appear to be involved in a mass culling of our species. In the UK alone, someone dies every two hours on the road and another 10 are seriously injured.

  1. Examine at least 2 reasons for believing in life after death

    Similarly the phrase "life after death" has its problems - if one defines "death" as the "end of life" then clearly "life after the end of life" is nonsense. However, arguably, "life after death" is not necessary a meaningless concept, and in fact this statement can be seen weak due to the way we use words.

  2. Death Penalty

    crimes, the penalty of death exerts a positive moral influence by placing a stigma on certain crimes like manslaughter, resulting in attitudes of disgust and horror to such acts Furthermore, retenstionsists insist that the deterrent influence of the death penalty reaches across state lines into jurisdictions that have abolished it, and so all benefit by its continued use.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work