• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Death Penalty

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discursive Writing Coursework. (The Death Penalty) The death penalty is a subject that can be counted upon to stir emotion and controversy into any conversation or argument. The very concept provokes a perfuse amount of valid questions and opinions. We live in a world rife with crime and violence; therefore many people believe that the severity of punishment should be increased. These people believe that the death penalty is the only answer. Death is not the only answer, death simply acts as vengeance and teaches that violence is how we should deal with social problems. Proponents of the death penalty quote passages from the bible such as, "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth," to try and justify their argument. This concept is clearly wrong, if these people were as religious as they claimed to be they would realise that a society that respects human life should not kill them for their sins. Only God has the right to bestow punishment upon these people. ...read more.

Middle

Regardless of this mans crime; he should have had the same rights as any other human being. There are many problems associated with this form of punishment, for example, innocence, money and racism. This is apparent after viewing the affect that it has had on the United States for so long. The main argument used by the death penalty's supporters is that the death penalty deters murders. They argue that it is the government's duty to protect its people by permanently removing murders from society. This would be a perfectly cogent argument if the death penalty actually accomplished this. After studying recent surveys carried out by The Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, it becomes apparent that America, a country where the death penalty has been legalised in some states, has actually witnessed an increase in homicides. Death penalty states in America average an annual rate of 7.9 homicides per one hundred thousand people while abolitionist states average 5.1 murders for the same amount of people. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, placing a murderer in prison until he or she dies presents a problem. The murderer then has nothing to live for. They may commit suicide or further crimes in prison as they realise that they cannot be punished any further. The solution to this is a sentence of twenty-five years. This sentence is long enough to act as a punishment and at the same time it gives the prisoner something to look forward to. The murderer then realises that in order to gain back freedom they must change their ways and behave in a respectable manner to gain back their freedom. Opposing the death penalty does not mean sympathy with convicted murderers. On the contrary, murder and manslaughter both demonstrate a lack of respect for the gift of human life. For this very reason, the death penalty is wrong and should be abolished from the world. Criminals undoubtedly need to be punished, but severity of punishment should have its limits, beginning with the use of human dignity. A world that respects these limits does not need to use premeditated and violent homicide as an instrument of keeping the peace. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Capital Punishment section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Capital Punishment essays

  1. Why and In What Ways Did Medieval European Attitudes Towards Death Change With the ...

    Intercessions could be bought for years in the future. Rent for the dead. People started to view these pricey intercessions and indulgences as a way of preying on the superstitions and fears of the common man. Attitudes towards Purgatory and intercessions changed in the 1500's.

  2. Should the death penalty be used lawfully in civilised society

    Retentionists are the people who have the 'eye for an eye' principle, and feel that execution would be the only way to make the public happy, as well as themselves. For example who doesn't enjoy it when, for example, someone steals money from you, and then the person who stole

  1. How might the death penalty prevent crime?

    From this we could conclude that death penalty shouldn't have any deterrent effect on criminals that commit crimes-of-passion and shouldn't recede number of murders by intimates. Contrary to this belief, although murders by intimates and crime-of-passion murders may be less premeditated than other murders, they are nonetheless deterred by capital punishment.

  2. What is a human being?

    * Is an ovum and sperm a person? * Is abortion murder? These are questions that are philosophical, religious or political. Science cannot help that much in resolving these arguments. And because these arguments are mainly religion based there is a wide difference of beliefs amongst people in different religions.

  1. Is the death penalty the best protection from a murderer? Is justice for the ...

    The Times reports that 10 of the 12 states without the death penalty have homicide rates below the national average. "I think Michigan made a wise decision 150 years ago," said the state's governor, John Engler, a Republican, referring to the state's abolition of the death penalty in 1846.

  2. The Death Penalty is wrong.

    Any punishment should contribute to the reduction of crime. The punishment for a crime should not be so idle a threat or so slight a deprivation that it has no deterrent or incapacitative effects. Most of all, it certainly should not contribute to an increase in crime. Does the death penalty really deter crime.

  1. Death penalty.

    That's not true". This one statement he made explains the government's reason for practicing the death penalty. These kind of people are not able to live in this society. They are dangerous, and nothing can make them better, so therefore they should die.

  2. The black death.

    appeared in the parts of the East, and, after having bereft these latter of an innumerable number of inhabitants, extending without cease from one place to another, had now spread towards the West. And thereagainst no wisdom availing nor human foresight (whereby the city was purged of many impurities by

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work