• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the universe in the universe of the result of

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Priya Modi L6H Monday, October 10, 2005 Outline the design argument for the existence of God. "The design argument fails because of its weakness", examine and comment on this The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the universe is the result of a design rather than chance. Such proof of order in the universe is noticed, implying if it is designed their must therefore be a designer. The argument seeks to establish that the needs of human beings and animals have been planned for by intelligence, God. It implies the whole mechanism of evolution was put in place by God in order to bring about order, purpose and regularity instead of chaos. The design argument or also known as the teleological argument (telos is a Greek word meaning 'end' or 'purpose') is a posteriori argument meaning it is from experience or observation. The design argument would conclude to be an inductive argument which means one could agree with the premises but however may not necessarily agree with the conclusion as the premises do not apply absolute support for the conclusion. The most common and easy design argument to understand is written in the book 'Natural Theology' in 1802 by William Paley. ...read more.

Middle

The Aesthetic argument was bought across also by Tennant. He argues that we humans appreciate the natural beauty of the world- Art, music, and literature. But why do we appreciate them? Tennant puts forward the point that it is not compulsory for us to appreciate them as we do not need to for survival or development so therefore there must be a divine creator. "Our scientific knowledge brings us no nearer to understanding the beauty of music", Tennant. Richard Swinburne is a philosopher who agrees with Anthropic Principle. Swinburne argues that it comes down to probabilities, what is the probability that the universe was chance or designed? He concluded that there must be a designer as the universe is so complex and could not have just happened randomly; therefore this designer must be God. The key features show some valid points in the design argument which leads to an intelligence. It is a logical argument and a posteriori where people can look at the evidence. However it is an inductive argument and therefore there could be other possible conclusions, these would be the weaknesses of the design argument. Previously mentioned David Hume wrote a book called 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion' with three main characters. ...read more.

Conclusion

The design argument is user friendly and easy to understand, so even if one does not agree with it, it is still respected. A philosopher called Kent said: "This proof always deserves to be mentioned with respect. It is the oldest, the clearest, and the most accordant with the common reason of mankind." The design argument is also much respected as it has been around along time ago which is a strength and must mean some people have agreed with the theories. Aquinas fifth ways was written in the thirteenth centaury. The design argument has its strengths and flaws, so can we say that it fails? If Order or design leads us to a God then it does not lead us to the kind of God we are searching for. The imperfections we observe in the world would link us to a far from perfect God. Through the arguments about design it is not sufficient to prove the existence of God. The theories can only be used to suggest a probability of God rather than a conclusive proof of God. This may satisfy some people like Tennant which shows that the arguments has worked as the aim of the argument is to convince people that God does exist. This however is not a conclusive proof of God, based on just good probability. God can only be accepted by first hand experience as we have no right or wrong way to prove his existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    or "Who gave the world the ability to evolve?" There is no yes or no answer to the existence of God. Due to the substantial weaknesses of the teleological argument, it would be fair to say that to an extent, it does fail to prove the existence of God.

  2. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    (Is there a God? p.49) However, Stuart Brown (p.77) advises against this because it is controversial as to which proposal is less complex, so could theoretically be adopted by either side of the argument.

  1. Free essay

    God and The Universe

    'How did the world get started?' is a question of origin. 'Why are we here?' 'What is keeping us in existence?' is concerned with the underlying ground of all being. It is for this reason that whenever theologians talk about God they couple it with the idea of God the sustainer.

  2. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    For example he questions the stone being in the middle of the field and asks how it got there. He then compares this to a watch and assumes that because the watch has a design, a designer and therefore a creator, that the universe has a design, a designer and therefore a creator.

  1. An explanation and evaluation of the different perspectives on religion offered by Richard Dawkins ...

    However he is wrong in claiming that this solves the issue. Although theism and atheism can agree on certain principles they clash on others, and because this is a binary issue (god either exists or he doesn't...) one cannot be half or "partially" correct.

  2. Man and the Universe

    Venus, Earth and the moon, Saturn, Jupiter and the fixed stars * The earth rotated on an daily rotation, annual rotation and annual tilting of its axis * The planets all rotate in identical circular patterns * The earth was closer to the sun than to the stars.

  1. Priya Modi L6H

    An atheist puts its full faith into science and therefore would explain evil and suffering due to scientific reasons thus not causing a problem for the existence of it. Nevertheless evil would cause a problem for a theist as it poses a challenge on their faith.

  2. As a recovering addict, I can understand Lao Tse's instructions regarding desire. He ...

    Tao can mean the way ahead; te can mean virtue; Ching can mean scripture. So, the title could be translated as "The Classic of the Way and the Power," "The Great Book of the Way" or "The Doctrine of the Path and its Virtues."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work