Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the universe in the universe of the result of

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Priya Modi L6H Monday, October 10, 2005 Outline the design argument for the existence of God. "The design argument fails because of its weakness", examine and comment on this The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the universe is the result of a design rather than chance. Such proof of order in the universe is noticed, implying if it is designed their must therefore be a designer. The argument seeks to establish that the needs of human beings and animals have been planned for by intelligence, God. It implies the whole mechanism of evolution was put in place by God in order to bring about order, purpose and regularity instead of chaos. The design argument or also known as the teleological argument (telos is a Greek word meaning 'end' or 'purpose') is a posteriori argument meaning it is from experience or observation. The design argument would conclude to be an inductive argument which means one could agree with the premises but however may not necessarily agree with the conclusion as the premises do not apply absolute support for the conclusion. The most common and easy design argument to understand is written in the book 'Natural Theology' in 1802 by William Paley. ...read more.

Middle

The Aesthetic argument was bought across also by Tennant. He argues that we humans appreciate the natural beauty of the world- Art, music, and literature. But why do we appreciate them? Tennant puts forward the point that it is not compulsory for us to appreciate them as we do not need to for survival or development so therefore there must be a divine creator. "Our scientific knowledge brings us no nearer to understanding the beauty of music", Tennant. Richard Swinburne is a philosopher who agrees with Anthropic Principle. Swinburne argues that it comes down to probabilities, what is the probability that the universe was chance or designed? He concluded that there must be a designer as the universe is so complex and could not have just happened randomly; therefore this designer must be God. The key features show some valid points in the design argument which leads to an intelligence. It is a logical argument and a posteriori where people can look at the evidence. However it is an inductive argument and therefore there could be other possible conclusions, these would be the weaknesses of the design argument. Previously mentioned David Hume wrote a book called 'Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion' with three main characters. ...read more.

Conclusion

The design argument is user friendly and easy to understand, so even if one does not agree with it, it is still respected. A philosopher called Kent said: "This proof always deserves to be mentioned with respect. It is the oldest, the clearest, and the most accordant with the common reason of mankind." The design argument is also much respected as it has been around along time ago which is a strength and must mean some people have agreed with the theories. Aquinas fifth ways was written in the thirteenth centaury. The design argument has its strengths and flaws, so can we say that it fails? If Order or design leads us to a God then it does not lead us to the kind of God we are searching for. The imperfections we observe in the world would link us to a far from perfect God. Through the arguments about design it is not sufficient to prove the existence of God. The theories can only be used to suggest a probability of God rather than a conclusive proof of God. This may satisfy some people like Tennant which shows that the arguments has worked as the aim of the argument is to convince people that God does exist. This however is not a conclusive proof of God, based on just good probability. God can only be accepted by first hand experience as we have no right or wrong way to prove his existence. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. 'Darwin's theory of Evolution undermined the Argument from Design'. Is this true?

    (Is there a God? p.49) However, Stuart Brown (p.77) advises against this because it is controversial as to which proposal is less complex, so could theoretically be adopted by either side of the argument.

  2. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    The argument is quite profound in its simplicity. The evidence for this argument is divided into two segments: the teleological and the arguments from providence. Swinburne's teleological argument is again probability, the fact that the universe is so complex and yet it is governed by "simple" scientific laws which provides the environment for life.

  1. What does St. Thomas Aquinas consider to be the nature and methodology of the ...

    That God exists and scripture is divine in its revelation. The principles of the Churches teaching and belief is not the bases of argument unless the other party has come from the same starting point. God. "This is what you should say, encouraging or arguing with full authority; no one should despise you."

  2. Free essay

    Comment on The Design Argument

    For example he questions the stone being in the middle of the field and asks how it got there. He then compares this to a watch and assumes that because the watch has a design, a designer and therefore a creator, that the universe has a design, a designer and therefore a creator.

  1. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    cats exist and then going on to make a predicate existence from them. In other words, if one imagines a cat and do not tell anyone whether this cat has any particular characteristics or qualities, all one has is the abstract notion of a four legged animal within a certain general size and shape.

  2. Outline the key strengths and weaknesses of the teleological argument.

    There is much strength to the teleological argument. Probably its best point is that it is simple to understand (e.g. Ockham's razor). Because of its simplicity it can easily be applied to a multitude of situations and examples. The simplicity of the argument is what has led to the widespread

  1. T H E D E S I G N A R ...

    Philo strengthens his argument by another point: 4. Animal adaptation cannot be used to prove a designer of animals since if they did not adapt to their environment they would not survive. It is not legitimate to use what could not be otherwise as evidence of intelligent planning.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Random design or chance? The sheer complexity of the universe makes it doubtful that it was a result from chance, it is more probable that it is the result of design. If it is design Swinburne concluded that it was the result of God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work