• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The God Question

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The God question The question of whether a higher being governs all of existence has been pondered since man gained sentience. This may stem either from the need for some form of reasoning and even justification for our existence. Or from the human aspiration to be omnipotent and omniscient, by creating a God man has enabled himself to have the opportunity to become one, or logically stated; * God creates man * Man kills God * Man becomes God * God creates man... This also begs a semantic yet crucial question; is God a noun or an adjective? Does one worship a God or a being which is God? This, although quite simplistically put this is a very important point. All if not most religions upon asking would state quite bluntly that God was obviously a proper noun, yet looking at the language in a fair few holy books it seems, if on a base level, to fall into the behaviour patterns of a adjective, ergo making it possible for the reader to perceive the possibility of them gaining the power which this fictional God possesses. ...read more.

Middle

Without a logical method of proving God there is only one options for theists, to make a leap of faith, in other words to believe in something without sufficient evidence to justify that belief, this factor is key to many of the mainstream religions. The fact that we would cross this gap is also a key point in the human psyche; if we have the urge to have an all powerful being with us to such a degree as to consciously make that jump then there must be many underlying reasons for that urge. This pure faith can be said to be a sign of devotion to the God you worship thus making you worthy, therefore there need not be any tangible evidence for God because then the act of faith would become meaningless ergo the very lack of evidence for this being is the factor which will convince theists of his existence. Many religions state that our creation must have been an act of love and compassion from a greater being, but how can such a compassionate loving being knowingly create such an antagonised destructive race, unless of course this life is simply a test of our faith, but what of those who have faith and still suffer? ...read more.

Conclusion

theorists of our time these suggest, to me, that the possibility of a being such as this is unlikely if not impossible due to it's sheer implausibility, a motive for it to be fictional, not to mention that in most cases is it a contradiction in terms. All of these arguments simply circle and we have yet to come to a definitive conclusion, thus without more evidence either way we gain nothing from the debate of the nature of God. Also the God argument uses reverse logic which has been proven to be invalid, in that in correct logical processing we have a premise statement and a relational statement and attempt to derive a solution from that; however in the God problem we have a solution (The existence or non-existence of God.) and attempt to achieve a premised statement and a relational statement that allow for our original conclusion. This in turn is incorrect logic, thus rendering any form of this argument invalid. Although despite its futility I believe this debate will continue until the end of man's existence because, if we have no creator to argue for or against then what purpose do we have? ?? ?? ?? ?? Jonathan Lloyd ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument.

    Instead of trying to prove Gods existence psychologists such as Freud and Jung ask 'what makes people religious?' Through examining the mental processes involved in religion, they conclude that under certain circumstances, the brain is stimulated into a religious outlook, the stimulus can be either emotionally, socially or physically based.

  2. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    And to prove God's existence we need to be able to trust our intellect but we can not do this without the proof that he does exist. It creates a Cartesian circle. Hume's argument from design argues that the world works like a machine and lots of subdivided machines.

  1. R.E. Examination-Style Question It is hard to believe in God in today's world" ...

    - Why would a loving God create natural disasters? For example, why would a loving God create volcanoes, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes and tsunamis. - Apparent religious experiences or miracles, such as being visited by angels, can mostly be scientifically or medically proved wrong.

  2. Suffering in Religions of the World

    The Vedas, meaning 'to know', set out a straight forward way of understanding suffering. In early Hindu thought the forces of nature were personified as different Gods and suffering was understood as a consequence of personal activity on the part of that particular God.

  1. Arguments about god.

    The answer from Christians lies in the bible. It states in the second creation story that God gave us free will, because he didn't want little slaves following him round everywhere, doing exactly as he pleased, and not having a life for themselves.

  2. The Nature of God.

    However this argument is not foolproof. Some people believe that there is no evidence that the something that started the chain of movement off was God. Then Christians would put forward the argument of design. This argument is also called the teleological argument and was founded by William Paley who lived in the 18th and 19th centuries.

  1. The Background to the Debate about God.

    Did as good a job as he could, accounts for imperfections in the world. * Beauty, truth, justice, goodness not perfect, people who are truthful, doesn't mean they're perfectly truthful. True reality lay beyond. Finite world pale reflection of ultimate reality.

  2. What are the facts and philosophical points of contention in Platonic, Aristotelian and Christian ...

    The mind seeing that which is immaterial is the only true thing, and the physical seeing only the material leaves the soul at a place in between. Plato believed that a man can free himself and liberated their thoughts and bondage directing their lives so that when they die, the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work