• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence" The ontological argument, put forward by Anselm of Canterbury, is an a prior argument, which means it is an argument based solely on reason and logic. Logic is something that both believers and non-believers possess, and to which everyone has access; therefore Anselm believed his argument to be convincing enough to prove the existence of God. However, I do not think he successfully proves the existence of God through the ontological argument, for reasons that I will discuss in the essay. Anselm puts his argument in the following form: 1. The definition of "God" is "the greatest thing that can be conceived" 2. Existence in reality is greater than mere existence in the understanding 3. Therefore, God must exist in reality, not just in the understanding It must first be noted that the argument seeks to prove the statement 'God exists' as an analytic statement - a statement that is necessarily true. He insists that the definition of God is de dicto necessary, and accepted that if this was true, then belief in God was inevitable. He tries to prove the existence of God without referring to any of the effects God has had on the world. ...read more.

Middle

Also, God's existence cannot be proven with our logic; his logic is superior to ours, and it is absurd to try and explain him using a different set of logic. Also, the argument assumes that existence in reality and in the mind is greater than existence in the mind alone. This might not necessarily be the case. Immanuel Kant objected that existence itself was not an attribute to a concept, such as temperature, or colour. Existence cannot alter the concept of an essence; and so the existence of God cannot add to the concept of God. Suppose we were given two separate statements - "Triangles exist", and "Triangles have three sides". The first one tells us nothing about triangles other than the fact that it exists; but the latter is a predicate - it tells us a lot more about triangles. Kant said that existence could not be associated with the definition of something. For example, if the definition of the word 'Kriangle' is 'a triangle that exists', then our only option would be to come to the conclusion that a kriangle (and thus, a triangle) exists. This is what the definition tells us. However, using this method we could prove the existence of anything, simply by defining something through its existence. ...read more.

Conclusion

* There is no single definition of God that can be agreed upon; his perfection can have different meanings to different people. How can his existence be derived from his definition if the definition itself hasn't been fully established? * The whole ontological argument uses human logic to infer the existence of a higher being; but God is superior to us - our logic is not fit to explain his existence. * Existence is not a predicate; it does not add anything to the concept of an essence - we cannot say something is 'greater' just because it exists. * Is God the greatest thing that can be conceived? Surely he cannot be greater than two Gods, but this would contradict his perfection. The definition of God being the greatest conceivable thing is therefore meaningless. * Gaunilo's perfect island argument: anything can be proven to exist using Anselm's logic, including the perfect island. But it does not, so Anselm's logic fails. The ontological argument put forward by Anselm is greatly flawed, proven by the arguments against it I have presented in the essay. Though it makes a brave attempt at proving God's existence through the simplicity of his definition alone, there are some obvious faults that have been attacked by various other philosophers. Anselm fails to prove the existence of God through his ontological argument. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    Gaunilo said that we cannot simply define things into existence. We cannot show an island or God exists simply by analyzing that idea. A critique of Descartes comes from the philosopher David Hume who argued against the ontological argument for the belief in God.

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    and the sides (predicate) then the triangle is left with no contradiction. One can define an object as one sees fit, but this definition does not always meet the definition in real life. Descartes then goes on to argue that existence is not a predicate.

  1. The Existence of God

    The "watch" may look complex because we have seen other "watches" before and therefore we can compare different watches to each other, so we cannot say that our universe is "complex" because we have nothing else to compare it to.

  2. Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

    out' any unnecessary belief, and deal with pure reality rather than 'fantasy'. Kierkegaard was a famous anti-rationalist, who said that Christianity is self-contradictory, and we believe because of faith and not reason.

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    The last early philosopher to object was Bertrand Russell (1872-1970). He argued that there were different types of existence, such as if you have an idea of a cow you can go out and find one. However, if you have an idea of a unicorn, that image exists only in the mind.

  2. The Ontological Argument

    The next criticism of the Ontological argument comes from the idea that existence is not a predicate, which was first argued by David Hume. He stated that describing something as existing in the mind was no different from describing something as existing in reality, they "are nothing different from each other" as adding existence "makes no addition to it".

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    As a result of this they are very hard to explain and therefore they are experiences of God, something we have never experienced before. The next argument and the only deductive argument is the ontological argument. The Ontological argument is based not on observing the world but by reason alone.

  2. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    If this were the case then even the idea Super Pegasus would need to be formed from an idea of something equal to or greater than it, which Pegasus is not. This example leads on to the 'overload objection'. That is that if existence is a property you could apply it to any say mythical or imaginary creature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work