• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence"

Extracts from this document...


"The Ontological Argument fails to prove God's existence" The ontological argument, put forward by Anselm of Canterbury, is an a prior argument, which means it is an argument based solely on reason and logic. Logic is something that both believers and non-believers possess, and to which everyone has access; therefore Anselm believed his argument to be convincing enough to prove the existence of God. However, I do not think he successfully proves the existence of God through the ontological argument, for reasons that I will discuss in the essay. Anselm puts his argument in the following form: 1. The definition of "God" is "the greatest thing that can be conceived" 2. Existence in reality is greater than mere existence in the understanding 3. Therefore, God must exist in reality, not just in the understanding It must first be noted that the argument seeks to prove the statement 'God exists' as an analytic statement - a statement that is necessarily true. He insists that the definition of God is de dicto necessary, and accepted that if this was true, then belief in God was inevitable. He tries to prove the existence of God without referring to any of the effects God has had on the world. ...read more.


Also, God's existence cannot be proven with our logic; his logic is superior to ours, and it is absurd to try and explain him using a different set of logic. Also, the argument assumes that existence in reality and in the mind is greater than existence in the mind alone. This might not necessarily be the case. Immanuel Kant objected that existence itself was not an attribute to a concept, such as temperature, or colour. Existence cannot alter the concept of an essence; and so the existence of God cannot add to the concept of God. Suppose we were given two separate statements - "Triangles exist", and "Triangles have three sides". The first one tells us nothing about triangles other than the fact that it exists; but the latter is a predicate - it tells us a lot more about triangles. Kant said that existence could not be associated with the definition of something. For example, if the definition of the word 'Kriangle' is 'a triangle that exists', then our only option would be to come to the conclusion that a kriangle (and thus, a triangle) exists. This is what the definition tells us. However, using this method we could prove the existence of anything, simply by defining something through its existence. ...read more.


* There is no single definition of God that can be agreed upon; his perfection can have different meanings to different people. How can his existence be derived from his definition if the definition itself hasn't been fully established? * The whole ontological argument uses human logic to infer the existence of a higher being; but God is superior to us - our logic is not fit to explain his existence. * Existence is not a predicate; it does not add anything to the concept of an essence - we cannot say something is 'greater' just because it exists. * Is God the greatest thing that can be conceived? Surely he cannot be greater than two Gods, but this would contradict his perfection. The definition of God being the greatest conceivable thing is therefore meaningless. * Gaunilo's perfect island argument: anything can be proven to exist using Anselm's logic, including the perfect island. But it does not, so Anselm's logic fails. The ontological argument put forward by Anselm is greatly flawed, proven by the arguments against it I have presented in the essay. Though it makes a brave attempt at proving God's existence through the simplicity of his definition alone, there are some obvious faults that have been attacked by various other philosophers. Anselm fails to prove the existence of God through his ontological argument. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Ontological Argument - Describe and explain the ontological argument for the existence ...

    Gaunilo said that we cannot simply define things into existence. We cannot show an island or God exists simply by analyzing that idea. A critique of Descartes comes from the philosopher David Hume who argued against the ontological argument for the belief in God.

  2. Using Inductive and Deductive arguments, is it possible to prove the existence of God?

    Although the Ontological argument may not prove God's existence it does give some pointers as to where a proof of his existence might lie. It may be strange to find a proof of God's existence based simply on what the word 'God' means, so it may not be possible to

  1. Arguments about god.

    The best explanation is that we have an omnipotent God who created it. God created it and that's that. However, there are many objections to this argument. The first doubt is how this possibility matches the Principle of Sufficient Reason.

  2. What are the key features of the design argument for the existence of God? ...

    which will be the final end or outcome of the divine purpose expressed in evolution."8 Despite this assumption the idea of a "machine making machine" universe is a strong and convincing one. To identify whether the teleological is a strong argument it is necessary to identify the weaknesses.

  1. The Nature of God Religious Studies Coursework. I am going to explain, discuss and ...

    ever be observed by us and therefore a non-conscious being, in this case God, must have been present to have created it and eventually us. Paley also used the analogy of the rock in a field. By this he meant that if you were to find a rock in a

  2. The ontological argument

    This argument was devastating to the work of Anselm as it proved that being able to conceive the greatest being doesn't actually imply its existence. It was structured in much the same way as Anselm's and therefore did reveal a huge flaw in his debate (relying on definition alone).

  1. Can the Existence of God be proven?

    But Super Pegasus can't exist without the idea of Pegasus first. Also, another argument which I will look at in more detail later is that everything has a cause and is caused by something which is equal or greater than it.

  2. Does God Exist?

    Descartes tried to prove the necessary existence of God through this argument: 1.If there is a God it is a perfect being; 2. A perfect being possesses all possible perfections; 3. Existence is a perfection; 4. Therefore, God necessarily possesses the quality of existence.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work