• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The problem of evil.

Extracts from this document...


THE PROBLEM OF EVIL The problem of evil is usually seen as the problem of how the existence of God can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world. There are two versions of the problem. The logical version is based on the apparent contradiction involved in holding onto four incompatible beliefs. This being that God is omnipotent, that God is omniscient, that God is omnibenevolent and that evil exists in the world. It is seen that the existence of any form of evil prevents the existence of God. The probabilistic version takes the stance that given the amount of evil that exists its unlikely God exists, this suggests that if there was fewer instances of evil or lower extremes of evil its plausible to suppose God's existence. The fact that evil exists in the world constitutes the most common objection to the belief in the existence of the omnipotent (all powerful), omniscient (all knowing) and all loving God of Classical Theism. One would expect an omnibenevolent being armed with omnipotence and omniscience to prevent evil and suffering in the world or rather, as creator, never to have put there in the first place. ...read more.


An analogy can be made here between doctors and illness; if people didn't get ill then doctors wouldn't know how to treat certain illnesses. Criticism's can be applied to this approach. For example why couldn't god have created people in his likeness from the beginning and placed them in a perfect world? A response to this could be that a perfect world is quite inconceivable. The laws of physics make it unimaginable, for example a child falls from a top floor hotel balcony, in a perfect world god would step in and alter the laws of gravity so that the child floats safely down to earth. Scenarios such as this would cause innumerable problems for the human race, as they would be no telling when the laws of physics would change. By getting rid of the hardships of the world life would become like a dream where we could drift delightfully but aimlessly. If we lived in a perfect world then we wouldn't learn through evil and suffering, life in that sort of world is quite unimaginable. Irenaeus also doesn't appear to consider that evil and suffering often have negative consequences that greatly outweigh the positive ones. ...read more.


William Paley points out that if a watch goes wrong we don't immediately say that it wasn't made for the purpose it was ascribed to. He says "irregulatities and imperfections are of little or no weight in the consideration when that consideration relates simple to the existence of a creator". He tells us to take into account the instances where "skill, power and benevolence are displayed". He is in essence in my opinion justifying the times when things go wrong and asking us to watch for the good things and don't pay as much attention to the bad things. This is all well and good but the same objection can be applied to this as the one I applied to St Augustine's argument right at the beginning, in denying evil one is denying the right to suffer and people all over the world are suffering. It shows no respect for those who are victims of evil and I believe this disputes God's omnibenevolence nonetheless. If god were a morally perfect being he would suffer alongside those victims of evil. In this essay I feel I have shown the problem of evil causes many conflicts within religious belief. Attempts to solve the problem are at best unsuccessful for example Irenaeus and at worst add fuel to the fire in the case of St Augustine. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. What is the problem of evil?

    If this is the case then there can be no logical contradiction in supposing that God is omnipotent and omnibenevolent and has a reason for allowing evil to exist. Numerous religious thinkers have constructed theodicy's to explain what this reason is.

  2. Show how the theodicies of Irenaeus and Augustine account for natural evil.

    Phillips argued in response to Irenaus' theodicy, that it would never be justifiable to hurt someone in order to help them. It could be said that God could never be seen as good if he is allowing all this suffering in our world, regardless of any reasons God may have for this.

  1. Judaism: Good and Evil - Describe what followers of the religion you are studying ...

    But has their belief in their God been made stronger despite of this? No event has so traumatised the Jewish people as the Nazi Holocaust. Some expect that the Holocaust would have challenged their view of man as good.

  2. Good and Evil

    God loved the people of this world so much that he gave his only son, so that everyone who has faith in Him will have eternal life and never die (John 3:16), God did an ultimate good by letting his son die for us so we must follow him and be good.

  1. What do religious believers mean by the 'problem of suffering?' Select any two ...

    Natural evil is a fitting punishment and came about because the human action destroyed the natural order.

  2. The Problem of Evil.

    can leave us on the horns of a dilemma. Consider the two conclusions below: Premise 1: God is omnibenevolent (all good). Premise 2: Goodness and evil are logical opposites. 1st conclusion: An omnipotent and omnibenevolent God exists and evil does not.

  1. Is there a convincing solution to the problem of evil?

    and it is just something that happens naturally to everyone as a result of evolution. 4. God is Boo! - God There are five theodicy's for the answer to this question. Philosophers Augustine and Ireaneas had their own theodicy for evil and suffering, and the others theodicy's are freewill defence, process theodicy and Monism.

  2. The Holocaust - personal response to Anne Frank's diary and the problem of evil ...

    completely wiped out, but nothing to the vast scale of the Holocaust has ever been recreated. This shows that the world has learnt something from this large scale event. Bela Rosenthal (holocaust survivor) also had a controversial view, as she believed that it is god who gives us the choice to do what is ethically correct or morally right.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work