• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using any of the normative theories learnt in class, critically evaluate two arguments for voluntary euthanasia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Euthanasia Using any of the normative theories learnt in class, critically evaluate two arguments for voluntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is when a person, who is terminally ill, consents willingly to euthanasia. The patient is usually dependant on life support or is suffering from unbearable pain. Euthanasia is a controversial issue as it is the killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease by another person, a choice which is sometimes out of the patient's control. It eliminates the possibility of a "miracle" cure or continued future for the patient. Using the normative theory of Utilitarianism, where the most amount of pleasure is derived from the most number of people, when a terminally ill patient is a financial burden on his family; more people, in this case, the patient's relatives who are funding his treatment, are spared from this burden if the patient undergoes euthanasia, and they experience the most amount of relief. ...read more.

Middle

In addition, spending a large amount of resources on a single patient by a hospital may deprive others of a chance to be treated with equal attention or equal quality of healthcare; it is more effective to be able to save many lives instead of expanding money and manpower on a single patient who might not live. Being able to give professional service to a bigger number of people serves the greater good and results in more happiness experienced by more people, as opposed to having only one patient benefit from this service. Kant's deontological theory advocates that the ends do not justify the means, and that we should treat another person and ourselves as an end, and not as a means to an end. ...read more.

Conclusion

This supports voluntary euthanasia, where the patient knows of the consequences of euthanasia, and not involuntary or non-voluntary euthanasia, where the patient does not have control over his right to live. Involuntary euthanasia is when the person undergoes euthanasia without his consent, and non-voluntary euthanasia is when the patient is unable to make the decision for himself, possibly due to a mental disability. However, if euthanasia is too common a practice, it might escalate to a situation where non-voluntary euthanasia is the norm, for the mere sake of convenience by the medical practitioner. The medical practitioner might also be faced with obstacles if he asked for consent, and if he proceeded with euthanasia, it would be classified as murder. In conclusion, voluntary euthanasia is an ethical practice, as substantiated by the above claims. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    Euthanasia is defined as ending a life at someone's request to end their pain and suffering. From my primary research (questionnaires) I have received a representative view from society on whether Euthanasia can be considered morally right. Here is a graph showing my results This graph shows that out of

  2. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    said: "...if we genuinely believe that all the efforts of medicine have been exhausted it may well be that in a particular case euthanasia has to be considered. That is a matter for the doctor concerned and I would be the last person to say they had done the wrong thing."

  1. What is meant by euthanasia?

    She went from 100% independence to total reliance. The article on Page shows an account of Annie, fighting for her right to die. Annie was a famous case and she had made a very big impact on everyone. She couldn't stand the loss of dignity as her disease slowly deteriorated.

  2. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    One is bound to respect life , but no one is obligated to prolong it in evry circumstance. He also argues that issues such as euthansia can only be handeled adequetly within the broad context of complete ethical theory. Maguire rejects the idea of a kind of fatalistic theism which

  1. Evaluate the Ethical Arguments For and Against Voluntary Euthanasia

    Passive euthanasia is to withhold treatment. Life-prolonging treatment can be withdrawn or withheld if the doctor believes that it is in the patient's best interest. 2 This is not necessarily illegal, although the doctor can be taken to court if motives are believed to be other than the patient's best interest.3 A test called the 'Bolam

  2. A Study of Beliefs about Euthanasia between two religions: Unit 3B, Section 1.

    "Do not kill," (Exodus 20:13) states one of the Ten Commandments found in the Old Testament. They were given to Moses on Mount. Sinai, as rules or guidelines as to how we should live together. This is the direct wish from God; so to violate that rule would be to go against God's wishes.

  1. 'Acceptance of the practice of voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in ...

    The 6th commandment also stated 'You shall not kill' (Exodus 20:30); therefore the taking of another person's life is a sin against God. Consequently Euthanasia under the sanctity of life argument would be forbidden as life should be protected at all costs and it is believed to end someone's life would be a sin against God.

  2. Consider the major arguments for and against voluntary, involuntary and non-voluntary Euthanasia.

    living my a set of rules and if the deontologist was catholic he would say it was wrong because no one should take anyone's life and that it is up to God to do so.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work