• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using any of the normative theories learnt in class, critically evaluate two arguments for voluntary euthanasia.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Euthanasia Using any of the normative theories learnt in class, critically evaluate two arguments for voluntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia is when a person, who is terminally ill, consents willingly to euthanasia. The patient is usually dependant on life support or is suffering from unbearable pain. Euthanasia is a controversial issue as it is the killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease by another person, a choice which is sometimes out of the patient's control. It eliminates the possibility of a "miracle" cure or continued future for the patient. Using the normative theory of Utilitarianism, where the most amount of pleasure is derived from the most number of people, when a terminally ill patient is a financial burden on his family; more people, in this case, the patient's relatives who are funding his treatment, are spared from this burden if the patient undergoes euthanasia, and they experience the most amount of relief. ...read more.

Middle

In addition, spending a large amount of resources on a single patient by a hospital may deprive others of a chance to be treated with equal attention or equal quality of healthcare; it is more effective to be able to save many lives instead of expanding money and manpower on a single patient who might not live. Being able to give professional service to a bigger number of people serves the greater good and results in more happiness experienced by more people, as opposed to having only one patient benefit from this service. Kant's deontological theory advocates that the ends do not justify the means, and that we should treat another person and ourselves as an end, and not as a means to an end. ...read more.

Conclusion

This supports voluntary euthanasia, where the patient knows of the consequences of euthanasia, and not involuntary or non-voluntary euthanasia, where the patient does not have control over his right to live. Involuntary euthanasia is when the person undergoes euthanasia without his consent, and non-voluntary euthanasia is when the patient is unable to make the decision for himself, possibly due to a mental disability. However, if euthanasia is too common a practice, it might escalate to a situation where non-voluntary euthanasia is the norm, for the mere sake of convenience by the medical practitioner. The medical practitioner might also be faced with obstacles if he asked for consent, and if he proceeded with euthanasia, it would be classified as murder. In conclusion, voluntary euthanasia is an ethical practice, as substantiated by the above claims. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. Euthanasia - Diary Entries.

    What if I forget who my sister is? Many questions are racing through my head, I hope they are answered. Week 1 Day 4 Dear Diary, As I mentioned yesterday I visited the library once again today. I had quite a bad headache before going to the library.

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    For example, the person could have not given the right permission and therefore it would be considered murder, people could use Euthanasia as an excuse to get rid of someone to benefit them etc. I consider this the destruction of life; however, I also believe that if the person does

  1. “An acceptance of the practice ofvoluntary euthanasia is incompatible with Christian belief in the ...

    agreed to a patient's request to be given treatment to help them die more quickly. A larger proportion - 46% - said they would consider giving treatment to help someone die if it were legal to do so. In November 1997, 200 GPs responded to a survey carried out by Pulse magazine.

  2. What is meant by euthanasia?

    Of course there must be safeguards. There are 10 guidelines drawn up in 1981 in Rotterdam which voluntary euthanasia has to follow. They include guidelines like 'The patient must be making an informed decision to die - I must be a voluntary decision', 'There must be physical or mental suffering

  1. What are the religious and ethical considerations to the issue of euthanasia?

    - the person dies the morality of both of these forms cannot be distinguished. Rachels also believes that there is no moral significance between killing and letting someone die. Because the motives and concequences are both the same wether it be active or passive.

  2. Evaluate the Ethical Arguments For and Against Voluntary Euthanasia

    Passive euthanasia is to withhold treatment. Life-prolonging treatment can be withdrawn or withheld if the doctor believes that it is in the patient's best interest. 2 This is not necessarily illegal, although the doctor can be taken to court if motives are believed to be other than the patient's best interest.3 A test called the 'Bolam

  1. A Study of Beliefs about Euthanasia between two religions: Unit 3B, Section 1.

    So to perform euthanasia on someone in a vegetative state would be morally similar to performing it on a normal human, simply because human lives are valued by God and each life was uniquely created by God. Apart from valuing each other's lives, Christians are morally against euthanasia because they are against killing.

  2. 'Acceptance of the practice of voluntary Euthanasia is incompatible with the Christian belief in ...

    The 6th commandment also stated 'You shall not kill' (Exodus 20:30); therefore the taking of another person's life is a sin against God. Consequently Euthanasia under the sanctity of life argument would be forbidden as life should be protected at all costs and it is believed to end someone's life would be a sin against God.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work