• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features or indeed the basis of Utilitarianism is the 'Greatest happiness for the greatest number' theory which posses a secular oUtlook to ethics.

Extracts from this document...


Utilitarianism is a contrast to classic approaches to ethics. One of the main features or indeed the basis of Utilitarianism is the 'Greatest happiness for the greatest number' theory which posses a secular oUtlook to ethics. Utilitarianism is the doctrine according to which actions are made right or wrong so far as they promote happiness, wrong in so far as they promote the reverse. The form of this definition conceals the fact that Utilitarianism is often called the consequentalist doctrine. One main feature of Utilitarianism is that according to Utilitarianism actions are not themselves intrinsically right or wrong; they are right or wrong in so far as they have good or bad oUtcomes. The version of Utilitarianism which holds the 'greatest happiness for the greatest number theory was popularised by Jeremy Benthem and his disciple John Mill and from them we have the ' Greatest happiness principle'. This derived from a 19th Century philosopher, Jeremy Benthem (1748-1831) who was the founder of Utilitarianism; Utilitarianism began life as an ethical principle under Jeremy Bentham who theorised that an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. In its original form the argument had many flaws, so John Stuart Mill decided to defend the principle of Utility against its critics by refining its ideas making them more practical in society. Classic approaches to ethics stress good intentions as essential to morality. ...read more.


His method of qualitative assessment of happiness is a progression from Bentham�s solely quantitative one which recognises educated pursuits above swinish pleasures. Moral issues are given special treatment under his scheme of higher pleasures, which acknowledges our higher regard for them as human beings. He also attempted to tackle the unstable use of Epicurian words but could not overcome issues like the loss of justice or the difficulty of knowing all possible out. His version though more refined is still flawed leaving a gap for theologians of the future to fill. One of the main features of Utilitarianism is the fact that it gives simple straightforward answers to simple questions, hence the 'average man on the street' can relate to it. For someone who wants this type of philosophy, Utilitarianism is just that; simple and straightforward. As an example, if one asks ' what should be my guiding principle in life?' a Utilitarianism would give a one sentence answer, ' always act in accordance with the Greatest Happiness Principle'. And, lets face it, for the average man on the street that is a plausible thing to hear! One thing about Utilitarianism is that it does appear to be right. Right, that is, in so far as they involve saying that suffering is wrong, that we ought not to make people suffer- aim at preventing suffering, and that the promotion of happiness is right. ...read more.


If one has moral ideals then it means that from the start there is good intention, as utilitarianism is a conceqentalist doctrine then it is reliant on outcomes, and outcomes are never certain. Another criticism, which I noticed, is the fact that a problem could arise when two courses of action produce an equal manner of happiness or goodness, and here comes in the problem of quantifying happiness. Benthams hedonic calculus is meaningless for two reasons; * One cannot reduce happiness or pleasure done to a mathematical formula * We all experience pleasure in different ways, the hedonic calculus presumes we experience pleasure in the same way. We could, theoretically justify any action on utilitarianism grounds by claiming that pleasure is personal and therefore cannot be expressed as a mathematical formula. On a bigger scale a good point is that utilitarianism doesn't distribute goodness or happiness in an equal manner. In certain situations this maybe regarded as unfair, for example, global wealth. Basically assuming that the wealth of the globe is currently distributed in a utilitarianism manner, this means that some of the world population is starving, and this is evident in the world. It would be fairer to redistribute wealth so the poor do not starve, however this may not be justifiable in utilitarianism grounds. It may be that if the wealthy have to give up some of their resources they incur a disproportionate amount of pleasure derived from the poor. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Ethics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Ethics essays

  1. What are the main features of classical utilitarianism? Assess the strengths and weaknesses ...

    John Stuart Mill puts greater stress on the variety of pleasures and distinguishes between their respective values. He maintains that some pleasures, namely those on the mind, are higher and more estimable than others, namely those of the mind.

  2. Christian Aid - A Charity Helping Poverty

    Therefor using a local labour force provides work in the area for the people helping to overcome poverty. There are many different types of aid given by Christian Aid, they are: � Continued aid - This is for helping refugees as part of a relief programme.

  1. What is utilitarianism? What are the strengths and weaknesses of the theory?

    An example of this could be the justification of genocide. While it is obvious that is very immoral behaviour to murder a group of ethnic minorities, it could be justified using Bentham's theory of utilitarianism solely of the basis that it is producing the happiness of the majority of the

  2. Aristotle - Virtue Ethics Essay

    Virtue ethics is not only so much more accessible in the modern age, but also far more applicable to individuals. That said however, Natural Law is quite a specific ethical theory and often there is less individual thought processes required when making a moral decision.

  1. Explain the significance of Plato's analogy of the cave. Is it of relevance to ...

    This theme continues later on in the myth when the prisoner receives great pain firstly being dragged up to the sunlight and secondly when he first sees the sun. The sun represents the highest form or as Plato interpreted it as, the form of the good.

  2. Problems with Utilitarian and Kantian Ethics.

    how unreal the scenarios may seem it is more than possible that they will eventually happen, and even if they don't, we couldn't have predicted that they wouldn't in the first place. Another way that utilitarianism is unjust is that it allows for the ill treatment of others, for example slavery.

  1. Kantians believe promises should always be kept even if breaking brings about benefits because ...

    my friend because I have promised to help the boy get into medical school, if I breaks my promise I will be going against my beliefs and will deny my philosophy in life".

  2. Religion and Medical Ethics

    an increased risk of multiple births, although this has risk has been stemmed to an extent as there is now a law which prevents women from having more than a certain number of embryos implanted at once. When the couples IVF treatment has finished, they may have some spare embryos that were not used during the treatment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work