• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God? Identify the strengths of the argument - To what extent are the strengths more convincing than the weaknesses?

Extracts from this document...


What are they key features of the design argument for the existence of God? Identify the strengths of the argument. To what extent are the strengths more convincing than the weaknesses? The Design argument is a theory based on the idea that everything in the Universe is ordered. It is also known as the Telelogical argument, derived from the Greek word "telos" meaning "end" or "purpose." The basic and fundamental proposal of the design argument is that because of the apparent order that is present in the Universe and on earth, we must conclude that there is an element of design involved. To design something, it is logical to presuppose that there must be a designer. This designer is God. The design argument is spilt into two parts; design qua regularity and design qua purpose. Design qua regularity argues that the order and regularity evident in the universe is proof of a designer. For example a formal garden shows evidence of a Gardner because of its order- the way it has been weeded and the way the flowers have been arranged. There is also order and regularity in the universe, for example the way the different planets rotate. Philosophers say this proves that it cannot have been just random chance. ...read more.


The Anthropic Principle, again developed by Tennant, is a more scientific (n.b Anthropic: linked to science) method of supporting the design argument. The conditions of chemicals and gasses at the time of creation where in just the right proportions for the development of human life. If these values had been even just a tiny bit different then this would not have been possible. With this in mind we are encouraged to conclude that, with such a minute chance, surely the universe must have been designed. There are weaknesses in the design argument that can be expressed. The basis of the argument "There is order in the universes, the universe has been designed, God has designed the universe" is an a posteriori argument. The universe certainly isn't ordered in the same perfect way as a watch is ordered. This shows Paley's analogy to be flawed. For example how can the world be in a state of perfect order when we have what is called "natural evil" in the world. Is nature not sometimes chaotic, not ordered? How does the design argument explain earthquakes and other natural disasters? We are told that God is benevolent, omnipotent and omniscient. If God created nature in such an ordered and perfect way, then why would he allow these aspects of it into his "divine plan"? ...read more.


It is easy to relate to the argument as humans are themselves designers by nature. It is natural for humans to think of things as having a purpose. The argument also makes good use of analogy. Whether this is using a watch, television or an acorn, using concrete images to explain abstract ideas aids our understanding of the argument by placing it within a context that can be easily understood. Some have also cited the argument's strength comes from its relation with religious materials, for example the creation story. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." For believers in God, this confirms and cements their beliefs. In conclusion, the success of the Design Argument rests upon probability and individual judgment. The Design Argument, as illustrated by the various criticisms of it, is by no means conclusive, if it was then everyone would know that God exists. If you believe that the universe is a product of blind chance then the design argument will not be strong enough to change your beliefs. I.e. it won't convince an atheist. However, the idea of the universe just being here, a brute fact, a product of blind chance and nothing more is a personally unsatisfactory one due to the extraordinary nature of the universe and so whist the Design Argument may not conclusively prove the existence of God it suggests that the existence of a Designer, who we know as God, is a more probable likelihood than not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    As Aquinas states nothing can cause itself, however, there has to be something there before time that was a cause of itself. Therefore, this must be God so therefore God exists. God had to be the first cause of everything as he was the first being that has existed

  2. Outline the key features of the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God

    There must have been a first mover which was a necessary being (not dependant on anything else for existence). This necessary being according to him began the movement in everything without actually being moved itself. This necessary being was God.

  1. Analyse the key concepts of religious experience as an argument for the existence of ...

    It can be said that humans are not just physical products but have a spirituality which gives an awareness of things, however human beings are just things and God is not. Furthermore, as God is not supposed to have a body.

  2. What are the main strengths and weaknesses of teleological argument for the existence of ...

    Things that do not have an innate sense of purpose, is usually guided or helped by something that does, such as and archer guiding an arrow. Like the arrow we all have an innate goal we all strive for, therefore this we, like the arrow, must be guided by god.

  1. Ontological Argument

    three sides totalling 180 degrees is just as illogical as defying God's existence. Therefore God who is supreme and so ultimately perfect, must exist, in the same way which a triangle to be a triangle must have three sides adding to 180 degrees to exist.

  2. The Teleological Argument.

    I believe that Kant is correct in his argument. Kant believed that cause and effect does apply in the tangible work because we see it everyday. This is not the same in the metaphysical world. For example the 'self moving principle,' if an object moved in this world then we would know that in order for it to move it had to be moved by someone/something.

  1. Outline the Design Argument for the Existence of God

    if the parts had been differently shaped, or positioned differently, or placed in any other manner than that which they are placed, either no motion at all would've been carried on in the machine, or none which would have answered the use now served by it."

  2. Outline the design argument for the existence of God.

    He felt that the great strength of the Design Argument lay in the 'temporal order' of the universe. A universal order, he thought, was too big for science to explain: all science can do is to assume the existence of natural laws and work within them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work