• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the cosmological argument?

Extracts from this document...


What is the cosmological argument? (33) The cosmological argument is a 'posteriori' argument; this means that unlike the ontological argument in derives that God exists from empirical observations of the world and the universe to conclude that there was a first cause behind it. This argument demonstrates that things come into existence because an external object or thing has caused them to, in a succession of event. However, this succession of events cannot go back to the beginning of time, therefore there must have been a necessary being outside of time and place, that brought things into existence and the cosmological argument states that this is God. Aquinas propagated the popular form of the cosmological argument. He developed five ways to prove the existence of God; the first three are used in the cosmological argument. The first way is based in motion. In order words things move due to an applied external force, for example a hand pushes the cue, which moves the snooker ball. According to Aquinas infinite regress does not exist, eventually it comes back to the first cause, God. The motion concept does not only apply to movement from place to place, but movement from quality or quantity, which when an external force is applied changes. ...read more.


Therefore the universe has to have a first cause which Craig argues is God. Once Craig had established God as creator of the universe he attempted to prove God as personal creator. Craig argues that if the universe has a beginning it was either caused or uncaused, either it was a natural occurrence or a deliberate action of God. Supporters of the Kalam argument argue that it was a deliberate action of God because the rules of nature have existed since the beginning of time, it could not have possibly been the result of a spontaneous event, and it must be because of God. Therefore the cosmological argument tries to prove Gods existence based on the belief that God created the world 'ex-nihilo'. If the universe was created out of nothing, the beginning of time began with the creation of the universe. Therefore there must have been an external personal agent who existed out of time to will the universe into creation. Aquinas, Craig and supporters of the Kalam argument propagate the first cause of the universe was God. What are the problems with the cosmological argument? ...read more.


Kant argued that the idea that something had a first cause could only be applied to the world of the sense experience. It cannot be applied to a world that we know nothing about. Therefore Kant did not accept any conclusion that God caused the world to begin, because as humans we do not possess the question to transcend our experience. If God is a casual being outside of time and space it is impossible for people to know what God created or God himself. The big bang provides a scientific explanation about the beginning of the universe. Scientific explanation has observed that there was a beginning to the universe and it developed an early structure very early in its development. The debate rests upon whether it was the cause of natural or the divine? A random spontaneous event or a deliberate action caused by God. Many philosophers have argued that if there is a first cause there is no evidence to suggest that it is any God let alone the God of classical theism, it could have been anything. The cosmological argument has to many faults for it to alone prove the existence of God. To judge adequately whether God exists one would have to take into account other arguments such as the design argument. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. The Cosmological Argument

    Yet there must have been a necessary being (a being which had to exist) in order to start the chain of creation. This necessary being is God. The theme of contingency and necessity provides Aquinas with his third way of viewing Gods action.

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    thus this starter of the series is God as he cause the series to start. This interpretation sees causation in terms of the factors that sustain an event or keep it going once it has begun. For example, a farmer may plant a seed to grow in that patch of

  1. Birth Of The Universe

    In fact, your researchers now know that on a single piece of film no more than one inch square that you could put all the information contained in 300,000 - 400,000 pages of a book. All can be fit onto a piece of film the size of a postage stamp.

  2. The Ontological Argument.

    (Proslogion, Chapter 2) The second stage of Anselm's argument is that it is illogical to consider that God might not exist: For one can think there exists something that cannot be thought of as not existing [or it is inconceivable for it not to exist], and that would be greater

  1. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    Anselm would point out that our inability to list all the properties (and presumably they are infinite) shows that `the greatest conceivable island' is not a possible object. And the reason why we can use such reasoning with God is that He is a possible object.

  2. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    supposing that there was a first phase in the world's history, i.e., a phase immediately before which there existed neither matter, nor minds, nor anything else. I suspect that my difficulty about a first event or phase in the world's history is due to the fact that, whatever I may

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    * If God's non-existence is necessary (could not, not exist), then God's existence is impossible since nothing capable of non-existence can exist. This implies that the Ontological Argument is not going to really hold together, if an argument can be used both ways then it is not really strong enough.

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    Another weakness is also that one may say that you can not compare a watch with the universe as the scale is too big to jump to; the watch is nothing like the universe. The design argument is a Posteriori which means that it is from experience or observation however this could be a weakness.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work