• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the cosmological argument?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is the cosmological argument? (33) The cosmological argument is a 'posteriori' argument; this means that unlike the ontological argument in derives that God exists from empirical observations of the world and the universe to conclude that there was a first cause behind it. This argument demonstrates that things come into existence because an external object or thing has caused them to, in a succession of event. However, this succession of events cannot go back to the beginning of time, therefore there must have been a necessary being outside of time and place, that brought things into existence and the cosmological argument states that this is God. Aquinas propagated the popular form of the cosmological argument. He developed five ways to prove the existence of God; the first three are used in the cosmological argument. The first way is based in motion. In order words things move due to an applied external force, for example a hand pushes the cue, which moves the snooker ball. According to Aquinas infinite regress does not exist, eventually it comes back to the first cause, God. The motion concept does not only apply to movement from place to place, but movement from quality or quantity, which when an external force is applied changes. ...read more.

Middle

Therefore the universe has to have a first cause which Craig argues is God. Once Craig had established God as creator of the universe he attempted to prove God as personal creator. Craig argues that if the universe has a beginning it was either caused or uncaused, either it was a natural occurrence or a deliberate action of God. Supporters of the Kalam argument argue that it was a deliberate action of God because the rules of nature have existed since the beginning of time, it could not have possibly been the result of a spontaneous event, and it must be because of God. Therefore the cosmological argument tries to prove Gods existence based on the belief that God created the world 'ex-nihilo'. If the universe was created out of nothing, the beginning of time began with the creation of the universe. Therefore there must have been an external personal agent who existed out of time to will the universe into creation. Aquinas, Craig and supporters of the Kalam argument propagate the first cause of the universe was God. What are the problems with the cosmological argument? ...read more.

Conclusion

Kant argued that the idea that something had a first cause could only be applied to the world of the sense experience. It cannot be applied to a world that we know nothing about. Therefore Kant did not accept any conclusion that God caused the world to begin, because as humans we do not possess the question to transcend our experience. If God is a casual being outside of time and space it is impossible for people to know what God created or God himself. The big bang provides a scientific explanation about the beginning of the universe. Scientific explanation has observed that there was a beginning to the universe and it developed an early structure very early in its development. The debate rests upon whether it was the cause of natural or the divine? A random spontaneous event or a deliberate action caused by God. Many philosophers have argued that if there is a first cause there is no evidence to suggest that it is any God let alone the God of classical theism, it could have been anything. The cosmological argument has to many faults for it to alone prove the existence of God. To judge adequately whether God exists one would have to take into account other arguments such as the design argument. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Existence of God section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Existence of God essays

  1. Explain the Ontological argument from Anslem and Gaunillo's objection 9s?

    If existence is in the definition of the word "God" then: "If there is no God, then no God exists" is a contradiction and would be like saying: "If there are no triangles, then the concept of a triangle does not contain three angles".

  2. The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Cosmological Argument

    This is a very good point to argue as many religions such as Islam, Christianity and Judaism will agree with this. As it staes in the Holy Quran: 'All praise and thanks be to Allah, the Lord of the Alameen (universe and everthing that exists in it).' (Al-Fatiha verse 2).

  1. "Modern visions of the Ontological Argument are more successful than early versions"

    Accordingly, the aim is to show that a maximally great being exists in some world W because it immediately follows from this claim that such a being exists in every world, including our own. But notice that the claim that a maximally great being exists in some world is logically

  2. Explain the Ontological argument.

    In turn, the wood is made hot by the fire, the external influence. In Aquinas second way he noted that nothing could be the cause of itself, because it would have to exist before it existed which is a logical impossibility.

  1. A Big Bang Cosmological Argument for God's Nonexistence

    say when I am trying to give Hume a run for his money, I cannot really believe in anything beginning to exist without being caused (in the old-fashioned sense of produced or generated) by something else which existed before and up to the moment when the entity in question began to exist.

  2. The Cosmological Argument

    The second way is based on cause. Aquinas asserts that there is chain of cause and effect in the world. (He does not refer to the motion as cause and effect as in the first way, but there are similarities). Nothing can cause itself. Something must have started everything off however, or the chain of cause and effect would not have started.

  1. Birth Of The Universe

    Imagine that our film is a shimmering bubble. When those seeds of energy began filling the space - began landing within the bubble that is your universe - they created interference patterns, ripples. None of them were "visible." Some were elliptical; others, symmetrical. They began to "fill the space."

  2. The design argument depends on key assumptions, in particular that the order in the ...

    He took the example of a human eye; its specific purpose is for sight. The eye adapts for sight therefore suggests that there is an intelligent designer for it, this designer to be God. Paley's argument would also be one of the most important arguments as one may be able

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work