• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own fate, and about the determination of those who care for him to keep him alive. What are the arguments used by both sides?

Extracts from this document...


Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own fate, and about the determination of those who care for him to keep him alive. What are the arguments used by both sides? Ken Harrison is suffering from a ruptured spinal column and various other blood problems. He cannot lead life by himself outside the hospital. His sickness will kill him and so he has to be kept alive by medical technology. He is however very determined to exercise a choice over his own life or death. He chooses to die rather than having to live this life. His decision is being opposed by the forces of medical bureaucracy who try to keep him alive. The case is taken to court and each side have their own arguments. Ken, being the patient, is in a situation where he can only think but can't act according to his thoughts. If he wasn't suffering and was not controlled by the medical profession, the path which he chooses to take in life wouldn't be obstructed. Professionally, Ken is a sculptor but considering his present situation, we can say that he is more like a sculpture. He is creative and has the ability to imagine and speak, but he cannot move. He can dream of his arts but when it comes to creating art, he will not be able to do it. ...read more.


Ken feels detached and not part of the group. For example when Ken asks Mrs. Boyle a personal question, she refrains to answer. Ken says "When I say something really awkward you just pretend I haven't said anything at all." This shows that he is frustrated with the fact that everybody around him is treating him professionally. People don't respond to his questions properly the way they should, neither do they respond to what he really needs. The only person who is personal to him is John, but Kay, the new nurse is between the two. She wants to be personal but is cautious due to her professional training. He has become an object of scientific virtuosity. His fate is to become a medical achievement. It is valuable to the doctors but to Ken it is like as if he is not leading his own life. "...Everything is geared just to keep my brain active, with no real possibility of it ever being able to direct anything. As far as I can see, that is an act of deliberate cruelty". He believes that the hospital is treating him cruelly. He is unhappy because he is not given any control over his decisions. The medical staffs think that he is incapable of deciding on his own which is not true because he is perfectly fit mentally. ...read more.


My personal opinion on this subject is that I believe Ken should be released from the hospital. The hospital may present optimistic arguments of Ken's probable cure in future but I feel that the future for Ken solely depends on him and so if he has chosen his path in life, let it be. If he has to live in hope for the rest of his life then it is better he is faced with death as it has to come around anyway. If he was happy living hopefully in hospital, then it's a different matter but why does he have to stay in hospital if he's suffering. His future is indefinite and his presence in the hospital doesn't much affect the lives of medical staffs as they have to stick being professional. So, his absence in hospital won't do much change to the doctors either because they have to continue with their life and their goal to save others. However him being able to implement his own choice of death makes him happy, may be because he doesn't have to deal with the pain anymore and him being given the power to exercise this choice makes him feel he has regained control over his decision making him feel more powerful to himself for the last time of his life and well, 'whose life is it anyway?'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    between the characters and also brings out Dr.Emerson's professional/ethical beliefs When Dr.Emerson tries to bend the rules his integrity is undermined. He tries to keep Ken in the hospital under the mental health act but instead of getting a neutral second opinion he got someone whom was biased towards his view.

  2. How does the playwright Brian Clark present the conflict between Ken Harrison and his ...

    scene, so that the audience would be excited in the range of events from the beginning to the end of the play. We see Ken is a man whose body may be broken but whose spirit is well. He never allows himself to feel sorry and keeps his dignity through jokes, mainly about his condition, i.e.

  1. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    science or religion and this along with lack of evidence doesn't provide a very good argument. Throughout my questionnaires and interviews I made sure that my questioning did not influence the responses I was receiving. I did this through correct wording of my questions.

  2. Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his ...

    It is interesting how, towards the bottom of the hierarchy the opinion swings in favour of Ken, whilst towards the top the doctors think Ken should be kept alive at all costs. To dramatise the argument each of these characters have varying opinions.

  1. Ethical Questions

    As long as no one is being hurt or exploited then it is fine and within a good ethical framework if all parties don't love out but are just to gain from these activities then it is all right if not better for some than a more restricted relationship.

  2. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    I think that he is feeling sorry for himself, but displaying it in a different way: using humour. Another way Ken gets us on his side is through the sympathy we feel for him. For example, he doesn't always feel humane and is sometimes ignored by the doctors due to their consistent role of putting on an act of professionalism.

  1. Euthanasia - How valuable is human life?

    To help with understanding this concept, compare the following situations. The first situation is a person standing on a poolside watching another person drowning and not doing anything to help. The second situation is a person actually holding another person's head underwater.

  2. How far does the film 'whose life is it anyway' succeed in persuading you ...

    Ken and Dr. Emerson both fight for their beliefs. They both have strong but different opinions on what the quality of life consists of. Both each have a powerful argument for and against the right to die. Everyday movements torture Ken. They remind him of the things he had and that he will never have again.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work