• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own fate, and about the determination of those who care for him to keep him alive. What are the arguments used by both sides?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Whose Life is it Anyway? is about Ken Harrison's determination to decide his own fate, and about the determination of those who care for him to keep him alive. What are the arguments used by both sides? Ken Harrison is suffering from a ruptured spinal column and various other blood problems. He cannot lead life by himself outside the hospital. His sickness will kill him and so he has to be kept alive by medical technology. He is however very determined to exercise a choice over his own life or death. He chooses to die rather than having to live this life. His decision is being opposed by the forces of medical bureaucracy who try to keep him alive. The case is taken to court and each side have their own arguments. Ken, being the patient, is in a situation where he can only think but can't act according to his thoughts. If he wasn't suffering and was not controlled by the medical profession, the path which he chooses to take in life wouldn't be obstructed. Professionally, Ken is a sculptor but considering his present situation, we can say that he is more like a sculpture. He is creative and has the ability to imagine and speak, but he cannot move. He can dream of his arts but when it comes to creating art, he will not be able to do it. ...read more.

Middle

Ken feels detached and not part of the group. For example when Ken asks Mrs. Boyle a personal question, she refrains to answer. Ken says "When I say something really awkward you just pretend I haven't said anything at all." This shows that he is frustrated with the fact that everybody around him is treating him professionally. People don't respond to his questions properly the way they should, neither do they respond to what he really needs. The only person who is personal to him is John, but Kay, the new nurse is between the two. She wants to be personal but is cautious due to her professional training. He has become an object of scientific virtuosity. His fate is to become a medical achievement. It is valuable to the doctors but to Ken it is like as if he is not leading his own life. "...Everything is geared just to keep my brain active, with no real possibility of it ever being able to direct anything. As far as I can see, that is an act of deliberate cruelty". He believes that the hospital is treating him cruelly. He is unhappy because he is not given any control over his decisions. The medical staffs think that he is incapable of deciding on his own which is not true because he is perfectly fit mentally. ...read more.

Conclusion

My personal opinion on this subject is that I believe Ken should be released from the hospital. The hospital may present optimistic arguments of Ken's probable cure in future but I feel that the future for Ken solely depends on him and so if he has chosen his path in life, let it be. If he has to live in hope for the rest of his life then it is better he is faced with death as it has to come around anyway. If he was happy living hopefully in hospital, then it's a different matter but why does he have to stay in hospital if he's suffering. His future is indefinite and his presence in the hospital doesn't much affect the lives of medical staffs as they have to stick being professional. So, his absence in hospital won't do much change to the doctors either because they have to continue with their life and their goal to save others. However him being able to implement his own choice of death makes him happy, may be because he doesn't have to deal with the pain anymore and him being given the power to exercise this choice makes him feel he has regained control over his decision making him feel more powerful to himself for the last time of his life and well, 'whose life is it anyway?'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Euthanasia section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Euthanasia essays

  1. The Issues of Euthanasia in Whose Life Is It Anyway?

    "Excellent...and what wine shall we order then? How about a '48 claret? Yes, I think so... Send for the wine waiter." Here Ken is using sarcasm to show Dr.Scott that he is not really interested in his dinner, but more on how her evening went.

  2. My hypothesis: Euthanasia should be legalized in the UK.I am going to answer a ...

    science or religion and this along with lack of evidence doesn't provide a very good argument. Throughout my questionnaires and interviews I made sure that my questioning did not influence the responses I was receiving. I did this through correct wording of my questions.

  1. Whose Life Is It Anyway? How does Brain Clark persuade the audience that Ken's ...

    This leaves us readers on Ken's side. Mrs. Boyle does not answer to this, and leaves. Ken also mentions how the doctors are superior to the patients. This is because the doctors have power over him. The hospital can also administer drugs to him against his will, if they think it is good for him.

  2. How does the playwright Brian Clark present the conflict between Ken Harrison and his ...

    Ken with what are basically the same words to show two different points. These two sentences have a high importance, which makes them one of the most memorable quotations from the play. The analysis of the play suggests that the author purposely placed the end point in the very last

  1. Evaluate the ethical argument for and against keeping a person alive against his or ...

    The Hebrew Scriptures forbid euthanasia and Christians hold that suffering is part of God's plan because Jesus suffered on the cross and so pain is just a way of life and something we all must endure.

  2. Brian Clark uses a number of techniques to dramatise the Euthanasia Debate in his ...

    Brian Clark uses the stage to discuss the debate of Euthanasia all around the hospital from many different points of view of the different people who become involved in Ken's circumstance. In order to dramatise this debate, Brian Clark uses technical language in this play to represent each side of the debate.

  1. How does Brian Clark interest and entertain his Audience in the play 'Whose Life ...

    murderer then some would argue it is necessary for human 'dignified deaths' to be recognized as the same. Would anyone want to suffer because the only cure for their pain wasn't allowed? Another argument would be that it is wrong.

  2. I believe it is the right of any human being to be totally in ...

    If I wanted to die I'd bloody do it myself and not ask others to do it for me. But i think it should be legal Everyone makes their own decisions in life and this should be no different as long as it is for a worthwhile purpose if someone wants euthanasia done to them let them do it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work