• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Accuracy and Precision Lab Report

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Lab Report: Accuracy and Precision Summary: In this experiment, we recorded the smallest unit of measurement for a ruler, two graduated cylinders, and a scale on a balance. We evaluated the measurement of volume, length, mass, and temperature. Next, we measured the temperature of water. We then found the mass and volume of water, as well as the mass and volume of the unknown metal. By subtracting volumes, we found the density of the metal, and compared it to densities of other common metals until we found the density that best matched out metal. Data: Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Analysis and Interpretation: 1.) Uncertainty Figures: Ruler: Height of 50mL mark on graduated cylinder: (� 0.1cm / 9.5cm) * 100 = � 1.053% Inside width of graduated cylinder: (� 0.1cm / 2.5cm) ...read more.

Middle

Mass of water is determined by subtracting the mass of the 25mL cylinder from the measured mass of the 25mL cylinder and water, or: 65.1g - 50.8g = 14.3g The mass of the water according to the density formula is D = M / V, or 0.997569= m / 16mL, or 15.961g. The experimental error looks like this: (14.3g - 15.961g) / (14.3g) * 100 = 11.6% error. 5.) The volume of the metal is obtained by subtracting the volume of the water from the combined volume of the water and the metal. 23mL - 16mL = 7mL volume for the metal. The mass of the metal is attained by subtracting the mass of the cylinder and water from the mass of the cylinder, water, and metal. ...read more.

Conclusion

The class average is 8.54 g/mL. This value comes closest to the density of nickel. Our group's density come closest to that of antimony. 8.) The percent error of our density: (8.9 - 8) / (8.9) * 100 = 11.25% error The percent error for the class' density (8.9 - 8.54) / (8.9) * 100 = 4.04% error. The class average density has a much lower percent error than our own group's. Extensions: 1.) Marie and Jason were precise with their measurements, but not accurate. Their average density was 2.83g/mL. Their experimental error was such: (2.4 - 2.83) / (2.4) * 100 = 17.9% error. Their uncertainty was such: (�0.01 / 2.83) * 100 = 0.353% uncertainty. 2.) When cutting legs off a table, precision is always better than accuracy. When precise, the same amount from each table leg will be cut, keeping the table even. The accuracy, though, can only be determined if the measurement is already know. Zachary May 9-4-01 5th ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Classifying Materials section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Classifying Materials essays

  1. Free essay

    Periodic table

    The xth shell holds a maximum of 2x2 Knowledge of the outer shell helps us understand how compounds form. E.g. Sodium chloride (salt) forms when Sodium gives and electron to Chlorine, therefore giving chlorine a full outer shell. This then forms an ion.

  2. Iron Oxalate Lab

    Materials; Part 1; Hydrated salt of Fe(NH4)2SO4 * 6H2O 150 ml beaker, distilled water, weighing boat, 1M oxalic acid, 6M H2SO4, Hydrogen Peroxide, 95% ethanol, Aluminum Foil, Buchner Funnel, Hot plate, 1.8M potassium oxalate solution 1 M H2C2O4 Part 2; permanganate solution, sulfuric acid, tongs, beaker, 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask

  1. The purpose of this lab was to differentiate between accuracy and precision by calculating ...

    Observations: Dimensions & Mass of Beaker, Mass of Liquid, and Volume of Liquid in Graduated Cylinder. Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Height of beaker 4.9 4.8 4.9 Radius of beaker 2.25 2.25 2.25 Mass of empty beaker 50.86 g 50.16 g 52.65 g Mass of beaker + Liquid 120.73

  2. THE RE-HYDRATION OF SPAGHETTI Lab Report

    Materials: 1. Pot pan and lid 9. Tissue paper 2. 1 portable cooking heater 3. 1 sieve 4. Water from the tap 5. Recording sheet 6. Electronic weight scale 7. 1 packet of spaghetti of the same brand 8. Timer or stopwatch Method: 1.

  1. Specific Heat Lab

    cmetal= (0 .005* 0.10)/( 0.005*0.10) - Our Error Values 1264.45= (.3998*3.00)/(.0495*80.10) - Our Results Uncertainty = (0.005/.3998+ 0.10/3.00 + 0.005/.0495 + 0.10/80.10)1264.45 Uncertainty = 187.2627 The result is 1264.45 � 200. Hence our range is from 1064.45 to 1464.45 Aluminum Table 2 Specific Heat H2O Mass of H2O H2O Diff.

  2. Potassium Iodine Lab Report

    R 7. Add 5 to 7 grams of K2SO4 to beaker A. 8. Mass beaker A on three different centigram balances. R 9. Determine the mass of a piece of filter paper on three different centigram balances. R 10. Using a graduated cylinder, add 37 � 1 ml of distilled water to beaker A.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work