• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Concentration and the rate of a reaction between HCL and calcium carbonated chips.

Extracts from this document...


Aim: My aim in this investigation is to find out if the concentration affects the rate of a reaction between HCL and calcium carbonated chips. Prediction: I predict that the higher the concentration of hydrochloric acid the faster the rate of the reaction will be. This is because I think there is more acid particles in 2 molar of hydrochloric acid than in 1 molar of hydrochloric acid to react with the particle of the limestone chips. Fair test: I think that I will keep it a fair test by using the same equipment for every time I do this experiment weather it is with 2moler or weather it is with 0.5 molar I will keep the same equipment. I will also keep the same weight of the chips, which will be 3g, and I will also keep the same amount of acid in each experiment, which will be 15 ml. Equipment: *Gas Pipe. *Measuring cylinder 1big. 1 small. * Basin. *Hydrochloric acid. *Calcium Carbonate *Stopwatch. Chips. Safety: When doing this experiment you should wear safety goggle in case the acid will get into your eyes, it will than protect you. ...read more.


Some collisions are head on while other collisions are glancing collisions. The collisions between particles have a range of energies. Head-on collisions between fast moving particles are the most energetic. If the colliding molecules have enough energy, the collision is successful and a reaction occurs. In chemical reactions if the activation energy is low, a high proportion of collisions will have enough energy and so the reaction is fast. Reactions in which have high activation energy, are slow at room temperature, because only a very small fraction of collisions have enough energy to overcome the activation energy. So the success rate is slow. Equation: CaCo + 2HCL= CaCl + H2OCL Results: 2 Molar 1.5 Molar 1 Molar 0.5 Molar What My Results show: my results show me that the 2 molar was the best reactant than the others because it was more concentrated of hydrochloric acid and it was the fastest to react with the calcium carbonate. The 0.5 molar was the slowest to react and it was the least concentrated of hydrochloric acid. ...read more.


I think that we were accurate because we got the right looking graph and we did finish the experiment in the right set of time that the teacher gave us. I think that I could improve my method by timing it more accurately and start to time it every 5 seconds instead of every 10 seconds. I think that my results were reliable because my prediction came true and the graph came out right. You could do different experiments on this topic by having different variables. You could use surface area, concentration the one we did, temperature and catalysts. Surface Area: with a greater surface area of solid, collisions are far more frequent. Because there are more collisions the reaction rate is faster. Temperature: at higher temperatures, particles are moving faster, so there are more collisions. Also the collisions are more energetic, so more collisions have energy greater than the activation energy so the reaction is faster. Catalyst: the catalyst seems to lower the activation energy for the reaction. Many more collisions are successful and the collisions are faster.` ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Aqueous Chemistry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

The response to the question is done moderately well. The candidate does not explain what they are measuring in the experiment very well and whilst there is some knowledge of the science behind the experiment this is not evidently linked ...

Read full review

Response to the question

The response to the question is done moderately well. The candidate does not explain what they are measuring in the experiment very well and whilst there is some knowledge of the science behind the experiment this is not evidently linked to the experiment but 'all over the place' in different sections. The evaluation and conclusion need further development to point out errors and make valid conclusions from the data. The table needs to be better presented with values, and clear segregation.

Level of analysis

The candidate explains their prediction in very simplistic scientific terms and I would expect further knowledge of molecules and compounds such that they should use proper scientific words. The candidate does identify things to keep the same but should explain why they are kept the same to show a deeper understanding of the topic. The candidate does not state at first what results they are looking for in the experiment so I wasn't sure what the water was used for, so this should be stated earlier to show the variables they are going to measure. The scientific knowledge is provided later which shows a good level of understanding but this is not linked to the experiment in any way. The equation should show proper scientific notation. I'm not sure what the results show and there are no units on the graph. I'm guessing it was the volume of gas that appeared in the cylinder that was being measured but this should be made clear. The results are explained with good trend. The candidate does explain how they might improve the experiment but this is not explained very well and where this is located is slightly awkward in positioning as the text does not flow. They repeat the same points in the conclusion and evaluation which are not the same. They also do not point out errors and improvements to the errors which should be done in the experiment.

Quality of writing

The title appears garish and unprofessional. I would have used a simple text format rather than word art. Calcium 'carbonated' should be calcium 'carbonate.' Minor grammar mistakes present a few times. Other error= 2 molar which should be 2 moles. Some minor spelling mistakes. Grammar appears fine. Layout is fine, but sub-headings should be made grammatically correct.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by skatealexia 25/07/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Aqueous Chemistry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To investigate the effect of temperature on the rate of reaction

    4 star(s)

    This may have been due to the temperature was too cold or because there weren't enough marble chips so there was less to react, or there could have been not enough HCl2. With 10oC and 20oC, some of the anomalies were too high, which meant that too much CO2 was being produced.

  2. Free essay

    Rate of reaction

    3 star(s)

    The final part to this experiment was placing 20ml of hydrochloric acid into the beaker and timing how long it was until the solution became to cloudy to see the cross through. This was then repeated 3 times and an average was taken for each concentration we tested.

  1. Indigestion Tablets Investigation

    I have used a highlighter to show that throughout their curves their respective results were very close. The two 55oC lines fall within the width of a relatively narrow band (highlighted in orange) for the complete curve. The 22/24oC graph line band has been coloured in yellow between the points to show that again the results are very similar.

  2. Antacid Experiment.

    carbonate and sodium bicarbonate: 4 + 1.4 + 0.7 = 6.1 cm cubed of acid needed to neutralise the tablet. Calculations for Bisodol antacid tablet. Note: This tablet is different to the ones above it has 2 extra carbonate ingredients so it will be different.

  1. Recrystallization - choose the most appropriate solvent to obtain a successful recrystallization of benzoic ...

    35 0.713 1.3524 4.33 22.1 1.30 1,2-Dimethoxyethane -68 85 0.863 1.3796 7.2 24.1 1.71 N,N -Dimethylacetamide -20 166 0.937 1.4384 37.8 24.2 3.72 N,N -Dimethylformamide -60 152 0.945 1.4305 36.7 19.9 3.86 Dimethyl sulfoxide 19 189 1.096 1.4783 46.7 20.1 3.90 1,4-Dioxane 12 101 1.034 1.4224 2.25 21.6 0.45 Ethanol

  2. Investigation to show how the concentration of an acid effects the rate of its ...

    gas syringes were wet causing them to jam and so not giving correct results or that the bung was not placed on the top of the conical flask fast enough which allowed gas to escape. Most points were on the best fit lines showing definite trend suggesting accuracy.

  1. Why do penguins huddle to keep warm?

    70 degrees and measure the temperature of it until it is at 70 degrees and then submerge the test tube arrangement into it until they are all fill. By doing this I shall have assured that all the test tubes start off at 70 degrees unlike if I were to pour water into each individual test tube.

  2. To investigate the rate of reaction between different concentrations of hydrochloric acid with metal ...

    At low pressures, the syringe tends to stick and not move. 5. The angle of the syringe is important as then in a horizontal angle, the gas will be pushing a less heavy syringe as it is a few degrees upright.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work