The Experiments:
For each experiment we collected the equipment as stated in the plan. We filled the copper beaker with boiling water and measured the start temperatures. We then put the beaker into the necessary insulation material. We then recorded the results every minute for ten minutes. This then gave us an idea of whether the materials being tested were a good insulator. Once the test was finished we started the next recording the results as we went along.
Diagram:
Results:
Test1 – with woollen insulator
Test2 – with woollen insulator and cloth lid
Test3 – with woollen insulator with silky textured polystyrene and cloth lid
Test4 – with woollen insulator with silky textured polystyrene no lid
Test5 – with woollen insulator, rough textured polystyrene no lid
Test6 – woollen insulator, rough textured with lid
Test7 – No insulation. Just copper beaker
Graphs: My graphs are divided into 3. Each set of results using the same kind of polystyrene whether with or without a lid are compared to (test 7) the test where the copper beaker was tested on its own.
Calculations:
Which combination of materials works out to be the best?
Rate of cooling, (this is worked out by the temperature drops added together than divided by 10)
Test1 =
87-84, 84-82, 82-78.5, 78.5-76, 76-74, 74-72, 72-70, 70-68.5, 68.5-67,67-65.5
3 + 2 + 3.5 + 2.5 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1.5 + 0.5 + 1.5 =20.5
10
20.5 / 10 = 2.05
Therefore the average temperature drop was 2.05 c per minute measured over 10 minutes.
Test2=
86-84.5, 84.5-83, 83-82, 82-80, 80-79, 79-78, 78-76.5, 76.5-75.5, 75.5-74.5, 74.5-74 1.5 _ + 1.5 + 1 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1.5 + 1 + 1 + 0.5 = 12
10
12 / 10 = 1.2
Therefore the average temperature drop was 1.2 c per minute measured over 10 minutes.
Test3=
85-78, 78-76, 76-75, 75-74, 74-73, 73-72, 72-71, 71-70, 70-69, 69-68
7 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 = 17
10
17 / 10 = 1.7
Therefore the average temperature drop was 1.7 c per minute measured over 10 minutes.
Test4=
89-84, 84-81, 81-79, 79-77, 77-75, 75-73, 73-71, 71-69, 69-67, 67-65
5 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 = 24
10
24 / 10 = 2.4
Therefore the average temperature drop was 2.4 c per minute measured over 10 minutes.
Test 5=
89-86, 86-84, 84-80, 80-78, 78-76, 76-74, 74-72, 72-70, 70-69, 69-68
3 + 2 + 4 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 21
10
21 / 10 = 2.1
Therefore the average temperature drop was 2.1 c per minute measured over 10 minutes.
Test 6=
83-81, 81-79.5, 79.5-78, 78-76.5, 76.5-76, 76-75, 75-74, 74-73.5, 73.5-72, 72-71.5
2 + 1.5 + 1.5 + 1.5 + 0.5 + 1 + 1 + 0.5 + 1.5 + 0.5 = 11.5 10
11.5 / 10 = 1.15
Therefore the average temperature drop was 1.15 c per minute measured over 10 minutes.
Test 7=
85-82, 82-79, 79-76, 76-75, 75-73, 73-70, 70-69, 69-66, 66-64, 64-60
3 + 3 + 3 + 1 + 2 + 3 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 4 = 25 10
25 / 10 = 2.5
Therefore the average temperature drop was 2.5 c per minute measured over 10 minutes.
From my cooling rate calculations I can see that test 2 has the lowest average cooling rate meaning this combination of materials is the better insulator.
Conclusion: From my experiments I can see that that test number 2 was the overall winner from the cooling rate calculations but on the graphs I can see that on graph (tests 1 and 2) the experiment with lid was the best. On the graph (tests3 and 4) the experiment with silky polystyrene and no lid was the best. On the graph (tests and 6) the experiment with rough polystyrene with lid was the best. Overall I think the experiments with a lid insulated the water better.
Evaluation: I found that performing a set of plan experiments very helpful because I found that some of my ideas to find out the overall answer were not correct. If I hadn’t of found the faults out then my experiments would have been a waste of time. I found that all results were helpful showing different materials capabilities but I found that working out of cooling rate was more helpful because reading from the graphs was proving difficult due to the differences in start temperatures. If I was to re do this experiment I think if I can more time I could of experimented with a wider range of materials and test further layers to try and improve the insulation. It is hard to keep the experiments fair throughout a range of different tests but on the whole I think our tests were successful.