• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Iron Oxalate Lab

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Marina Horta Iron Oxalate Lab 10/22/09 Abstract; The purpose of this lab was to synthesize, isolate, and determine Fe content of a complex; and calculate the formula of the Potassium Oxalate Iron(III) Complex using chemical analyses. This lab used filtration, titration, acid base reactions, redox , synthesis, dilutions , beers law and red tide computer system to establish that the final formula for the complex was K3[Fe(C2O4)3] �2 H2O. Introduction; Part 1; The purpose of part 1 to synthesize, purify and, mass crystals of potassium oxalate ferrate (III) complex. Potassium oxalate ferrate (III) is a complex, an ion consisting of a ligand and a metal covalently bonded together. A ligand is an ion with the tendency to bond with metals because it typically donates electron pairs. This relationship between metals and ligands is only one of the key components for the synthesis of the crystals. For the precipitation of the complex ion alcohol was used to reduce solubility, Part: 2 Part two determines the percent oxalate in the complex produced in the previous lab. Using volumetric analysis a method (similar to gravimetric analyses) in which the volume of a known substance is used to quantitatively measure the volume of an unknown substance required to react with it, or standardization a process in which the value of a potential standard is fixed by a measurement made with respect to a standard whose value is known and can be used to determine the value of unknown. ...read more.

Middle

Hydrogen peroxide is an oxidizer and corrosive( lab one) Oxalic Acid and oxalate ions are toxic (lab one ) Ethanol is flammable (lab one) Permanganate solution is also poisonous and corrosive Take caution when handling hot glass wear (lab part two) Calculations; Table 1 Weight of Crystals (part 1) Initial trey 1.49 (g) Weight of crystal 1.3934 (g) Weight of both 2.88 (g) Table 2 Data (part 2) Data mass of 1 2 3 4 ii iron oxalate 1.4974 g 1.4994 g 1.4977 g 1.4994 g Crystals+ Trey 1.6286 g 1. 6175 g 1.6256 g 1.6247 g Mass of Crystal .1294 g .1181 g .1288 g .1253 g Titration ; (part 2) 1 2 3 4 Final 36.5ml 36.5ml 48.6 ml 48.4 ml Initial 6 ml 8.5ml 18 ml 18 ml Volume used 30.5ml 28 ml 30.6 ml 30.4 ml Moles Trial #1 (.01057 M)(.0305 ml) =.003224 m (5/2) = .0008059 Trial #2 (.01057M)(.028 ml) = .002959 m (5/2) =.0007398 Trail #3 (.01057M)(.0306 ml) = .0003234 m (5/2)=.0008085 Trail #4 (.01057 M)(.03 04 ml) = .0003213 m (5/2) = .00080325 Percent by Mass Oxalate Trial# 1 (.0008059 m)(87.99) =(.07091)(1/.1294)= 54% Trial #2 (.0007398m) (87.99) = (.06509)(1/.1181) = 55% Trail #3 (.0008085m)(87.99) = (.0711#)(1/.1288) = 55% Trial #4 (.00080325m )(87.99) = (.07067)(1/.1253) =56% Table 1: Standard Curve of Fe solution Dilution Conc[] Abs 0.1 0.00001209 0.054 0.2 0.00002418 0.116 0.3 0.00003627 0.214 0.7 0.00008463 0.645 [] std= 0.0001209 Table II [fe+2] for unknowns ...read more.

Conclusion

the Fe+, this error could be again because of the dilutions or it could be a result of misusing the red tide equipment however because time did not allow the negative values were kept and simply not included in the final calculations of the unknown. The actual percent iron calculated for this lab was 4.5% a value much too low to be correct or useful this lower percent Fe+ shows that the concentration of Fe+ was too low to begin or not enough of the solution was pipetted to the initial 100ml flask. The average of all the experiments 8.52 was also too low, in order to get a correct value using the empirical formula from the percent iron the percent had to be at least 11 % which shows a systematic error in the experiment. Using the empirical formula and the adjusted 11% iron the ratios of the iron and oxalate was calculated to be 3:1 instead of the original incorrect 4:1 ratio using the lower value for iron. The value for z was calculated within the reasonable 2 or 3 value, at 2.4. The final determination in the experiment was theoretical and percent yield from the moles of the third and grams of the second day. The theoretical yield was 1.848 grams while the results of the second day yielded only 1.3 resulting in a 69% yield overall. The final adjusted formula was finally determined to be K3[Fe(C2O4)3] �2 H2O. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Classifying Materials section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Classifying Materials essays

  1. Determine BaCl2.2 H2O -Gravimetric Analysis Lab

    Possibilities for how we might have twisted our results might be, as I just mentioned, the accuracy of equipments. To be more specific, the weight could have been more sophisticated. The fact that it isn't the best possible weight might have affected our experiment in a bad way because we dealt with small masses i.e.

  2. Free essay

    Periodic table

    of a membrane Eukaryotic cells - these each have a membrane bound nucleus and other organelles - animals, plants, fungi, protista. Prokaryotic cells - bacterial cells that do not have a nucleus or other organelles held in membranes Differentiated cells - some cells (mainly multi-cellular organisms)

  1. Our experiment consisted of two samples of water containing unknown substances, and our objective ...

    Unfortunately, we didn't compare our results for sample A with other people's results. Also, the large measuring cylinders don't provide an accurate reading for volumes that are small like 20cm3. How reliability could've been improved in stage 1 If we could do the experiment again, I think that we'd have

  2. should salt be banned?

    "We certainly should make pregnant and lactating women aware of this deficiency," says Karl. "I don't think most primary care doctors are aware of it." Salt and Your Blood Pressure The link between sodium and blood pressure has been rocky in recent years.

  1. THE RE-HYDRATION OF SPAGHETTI Lab Report

    And coefficient of determination, R2= 09906, which is close to one. So this number supports the fact that there is strong correlation between cooking time and the percentage Increase in Mass if spaghetti. According to Kinetic theory, every single matter has particles of which constantly move.

  2. Rate of reaction of different concentrations of sodium thiosulphate.

    This table shows the results for the rate of reaction that will be used to create my second graph: Page 7 Analysis My first graph, the time taken for the cross to disappear, clarifies the weaker the concentration of sodium thiosulphate the slower the rate of reaction therefore the time increases for the cross to disappear.

  1. Affect of concentration on reaction

    Method used is almost identical as before, with the only differences of CaCO3 ground into fine powder and weigh accurately to 5g contained within a beaker. Results 2 50cm3 2.0M HCl Starting Mass 5.00g CaCO3 (Powdered) Time (seconds) Mass (grams)

  2. Research into Iron, its extraction and uses.

    is transported straight from the ground), next the cone crusher is used ( for increasing the production capacity), then the hydraulic impact crusher (used to eliminate sediment from the iron), and finally the grinding mill is brought into the overall method.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work