• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Iron Oxalate Lab

Extracts from this document...


Marina Horta Iron Oxalate Lab 10/22/09 Abstract; The purpose of this lab was to synthesize, isolate, and determine Fe content of a complex; and calculate the formula of the Potassium Oxalate Iron(III) Complex using chemical analyses. This lab used filtration, titration, acid base reactions, redox , synthesis, dilutions , beers law and red tide computer system to establish that the final formula for the complex was K3[Fe(C2O4)3] �2 H2O. Introduction; Part 1; The purpose of part 1 to synthesize, purify and, mass crystals of potassium oxalate ferrate (III) complex. Potassium oxalate ferrate (III) is a complex, an ion consisting of a ligand and a metal covalently bonded together. A ligand is an ion with the tendency to bond with metals because it typically donates electron pairs. This relationship between metals and ligands is only one of the key components for the synthesis of the crystals. For the precipitation of the complex ion alcohol was used to reduce solubility, Part: 2 Part two determines the percent oxalate in the complex produced in the previous lab. Using volumetric analysis a method (similar to gravimetric analyses) in which the volume of a known substance is used to quantitatively measure the volume of an unknown substance required to react with it, or standardization a process in which the value of a potential standard is fixed by a measurement made with respect to a standard whose value is known and can be used to determine the value of unknown. ...read more.


Hydrogen peroxide is an oxidizer and corrosive( lab one) Oxalic Acid and oxalate ions are toxic (lab one ) Ethanol is flammable (lab one) Permanganate solution is also poisonous and corrosive Take caution when handling hot glass wear (lab part two) Calculations; Table 1 Weight of Crystals (part 1) Initial trey 1.49 (g) Weight of crystal 1.3934 (g) Weight of both 2.88 (g) Table 2 Data (part 2) Data mass of 1 2 3 4 ii iron oxalate 1.4974 g 1.4994 g 1.4977 g 1.4994 g Crystals+ Trey 1.6286 g 1. 6175 g 1.6256 g 1.6247 g Mass of Crystal .1294 g .1181 g .1288 g .1253 g Titration ; (part 2) 1 2 3 4 Final 36.5ml 36.5ml 48.6 ml 48.4 ml Initial 6 ml 8.5ml 18 ml 18 ml Volume used 30.5ml 28 ml 30.6 ml 30.4 ml Moles Trial #1 (.01057 M)(.0305 ml) =.003224 m (5/2) = .0008059 Trial #2 (.01057M)(.028 ml) = .002959 m (5/2) =.0007398 Trail #3 (.01057M)(.0306 ml) = .0003234 m (5/2)=.0008085 Trail #4 (.01057 M)(.03 04 ml) = .0003213 m (5/2) = .00080325 Percent by Mass Oxalate Trial# 1 (.0008059 m)(87.99) =(.07091)(1/.1294)= 54% Trial #2 (.0007398m) (87.99) = (.06509)(1/.1181) = 55% Trail #3 (.0008085m)(87.99) = (.0711#)(1/.1288) = 55% Trial #4 (.00080325m )(87.99) = (.07067)(1/.1253) =56% Table 1: Standard Curve of Fe solution Dilution Conc[] Abs 0.1 0.00001209 0.054 0.2 0.00002418 0.116 0.3 0.00003627 0.214 0.7 0.00008463 0.645 [] std= 0.0001209 Table II [fe+2] for unknowns ...read more.


the Fe+, this error could be again because of the dilutions or it could be a result of misusing the red tide equipment however because time did not allow the negative values were kept and simply not included in the final calculations of the unknown. The actual percent iron calculated for this lab was 4.5% a value much too low to be correct or useful this lower percent Fe+ shows that the concentration of Fe+ was too low to begin or not enough of the solution was pipetted to the initial 100ml flask. The average of all the experiments 8.52 was also too low, in order to get a correct value using the empirical formula from the percent iron the percent had to be at least 11 % which shows a systematic error in the experiment. Using the empirical formula and the adjusted 11% iron the ratios of the iron and oxalate was calculated to be 3:1 instead of the original incorrect 4:1 ratio using the lower value for iron. The value for z was calculated within the reasonable 2 or 3 value, at 2.4. The final determination in the experiment was theoretical and percent yield from the moles of the third and grams of the second day. The theoretical yield was 1.848 grams while the results of the second day yielded only 1.3 resulting in a 69% yield overall. The final adjusted formula was finally determined to be K3[Fe(C2O4)3] �2 H2O. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Classifying Materials section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Classifying Materials essays


    Each matter however is bonded at different intensity; if the bonding level isn't that strong the matter is considered as a gas, if it's reasonably strong its considered as a liquid and if its strong its considered as a solid.

  2. Affect of concentration on reaction

    Conclusion I have decided the most appropriate mass of calcium carbonate to react with; highest concentration of 2 molar and lowest concentration of 0.4 molar hydrochloric acid, is 5g. The preliminary experiments have given me ideas to improve on the main experiment; calcium carbonate is ground to powder form, using

  1. The role of mass customization and postponement in global logistics

    permutations at a US warehouse, so that any one customer order can be rapidly filled from stock. Much better to ship across part-finished lift-trucks and to finish assembly, using the required options, at the warehouse. The important point here is that the warehouse has become an extension of the assembly line, allowing Caterpillar to maintain (or even improve)

  2. Free essay

    Periodic table

    Precipitate - when an ionic compound is unable to dissolve in water it forms a precipitate. Corrosion - when metal is eaten away by substances in the air or water. Displacement Reactions - when an element displaces another element.

  1. Determine BaCl2.2 H2O -Gravimetric Analysis Lab

    - 28.38 � 0.01g (Mass of Crucible, Lid and Heated Barium Chloride after 3rd heating) = 0.27 � 0.02g (Mass of water removed from Barium Chloride on 3rd Heating) Number of Moles of Barium Chloride: 1.67 � 0.02 g/ 208.24 gmol- = 0.01 mol [Mass of anhydrous Barium Chloride after Constant Mass is Achieved DIVIDED (/)

  2. Finding the empirical formula of aluminium chloride.

    In addition to this, only two more titrations were required as they were within 0.1cm3 of each other. Also, the error in the mean is +0.1, since calculating the mean involves an addition and a division. When adding numbers, the value of the absolute error in the answer is the sum of the absolute errors in the numbers.

  1. Rate of reaction of different concentrations of sodium thiosulphate.

    If there is enough input of energy between the particles a reaction will certainly take place. My first graph, the time taken in seconds for the cross to disappear in varied concentrations of Na2S2O3, displays a smooth curve and also a trend between the concentrations.

  2. Making iron II sulphate

    In the case of swallowing Sulphuric acid Solution, drink large amounts of water or milk. Do not vomit if possible. Calculating the relative molecular mass (RMM) A molecule consists of atoms joined together. The mass of a molecule will be the total of all the atomic masses added up.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work