• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the Functionalist claim that the family benefits both individuals and society as a whole

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assess the Functionalist claim that the family benefits both individuals and society as a whole. Felicity Edholm (1992) claimed that the family was a social construction. It is an important social factor, forming a part of the structure of today's society. The family can be said to create stability and focuses on the socialisation of the future society. The family can often be criticised for its "rosy" appearance, meaning that it is often mistaken for being too perfect, and the dark side of the family is often not portrayed e.g. domestic violence. Marxists in general would disagree with the idea of the perfect, as they believe the family benefits Capitalism. In 1949, Murdock claimed "The family is a social group characterised by common residence, economic cooperation and reproduction. It includes adults of both sexes, at least two of who maintain a socially approved relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted, of the sexually cohabiting adults." This therefore meant that Murdock claimed the "Nuclear Family" was universal, and families constructed of anything other than this, were not infact families. He believes that the structure of the family benefits individuals and society in four main ways Sexual, Reproduction, Education, and Economic. ...read more.

Middle

This idea claims that the Nuclear is under threat due to a breakdown in traditional values, over generous welfare to single mothers, feminism increase, and greater tolerance of gay and lesbian relationships. This they believe prevents the family from socialising its members well, an increase in underachievement occurs, and behaviour deteriorates of young members of society. Being "Married to the state" is one of the New Right's ideas about lone mother families, saying that they become dependent on the state for benefits and housing, whilst leaving their children to their own device. Dennis and Erdos (2000) claimed that "Families without fathers" increased the likelihood of boys growing up without expecting to be responsible for a family, therefore becoming anti-social and irresponsible. Another researcher, Charles Murray, argued that boys who grow up in single parent families lack role models, and are less likely to accept having to be responsible for work or parenthood, increasing the amounts of crime. This raises questions and can criticise the family itself. Criticisms of the family include that the family is seen "through rose tinted glasses" meaning that it provides an image that is too perfect, and does not show the dark side of it, e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

According to Fran Ainsley, women are the "takers of shit", and believes that male workers, who are subject to Capitalism, take it out on their wives. Radical Feminists take a stronger view, and say that in the family, men dominate women through violence, causing their oppression, however it can be said that child abuse still exists in lesbian families. Lastly, Black Feminists are for the Family structure, as they think it is a positive source of support against racism, however white feminists often ignore black women's experiences of racial oppression. When describing a "family" it is often hard to differentiate between the supposed ideal "nuclear" family, and those families more evident of modern society. Functionalists define the family as being "Nuclear" and believe this structure is universal. Functionalists like Murdock and Parsons agree that the family benefits individuals through the four functions Sexual, Reproduction, Education, and Economic, and by learning primary socialisation through norms and values. Parsons also claims that the stabilisation of the adult personality is also not just key for individuals but makes society stable. Once an individual member of a family is socialised primarily, it prepares them for the secondary stages of socialisation in a modern society. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

5 star(s)

Response to the question

This question has been answered extremely well for a GCSE candidate. The writer has a sound understanding of Functionalism, which is evident as the essay refers to key Functionalist sociologists, explaining their theories in great detail (Parsons, Murdock). As well ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This question has been answered extremely well for a GCSE candidate. The writer has a sound understanding of Functionalism, which is evident as the essay refers to key Functionalist sociologists, explaining their theories in great detail (Parsons, Murdock). As well as using external criticisms from other groups within sociology (such as the different realms within feminism - radical, liberal), the writer provides some internal evaluation. For example, by simply stating, “Parsons also agrees with this idea”, shows that the writer can reflect on similarities between Functionalist sociologists. It demonstrates that they understand the main sociological theory that the question is addressing. However, the conclusion, although detailed in terms of Functionalism, lacks summative statements regarding opposing theories. Most candidates do tend to forget to address its critiques in this crucial section of the essay, but by referring to more theories in the conclusion than the question asks for, really would set this candidate apart from the rest of their peer group.

Level of analysis

The writer explains sociological theory in detail, and includes a range of sociologists, which shows the great extent of their knowledge. The writer also provides strengths of the Functionalist claim (for example by referring to the New Right) rather than just its weaknesses, which most candidates tend to forget to include. Marxism and feminism are also well explained as a Functionalist critique, which is impressive at GCSE level. Functionalist and Marxist key terms are used particularly well in context, “capitalist” and “organic analogy”, as well as Functionalist key concepts such as “the stabilisation of adult personalities”. This clearly shows that they have an impressive knowledge of sociology as a whole. The only key term which I felt could be mentioned is the radical/Marxist feminist concept of patriarchy (as the family is patriarchal). However this is still a brilliant essay for GCSE, and this minor issue would not diminish the overall grade awarded to this academically sound essay. The use of the term would just improve the essay to an even higher standard.

Quality of writing

There are random uses of capital letters for certain words in this essay, such as “Capitalism” and “Stabilisation” which is inaccurate. I think the writer just feels that these terms are crucially important to the essay, and so feels the need to differentiate them somehow. However this importance could be best portrayed by using quotation marks where appropriate instead.
A few minor grammatical issues could be rectified by adding an extra word, for example, “Marxists in general would disagree with the idea of the perfect, as they believe the family benefits Capitalism”, would make more sense if the writer had proceeded to write the word “family” after writing “perfect”. On the whole spelling, punctuation and grammar are very good, especially for a GCSE candidate.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by cwhite 28/02/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Marriage is no longer important. Evaluate the arguments for and against

    4 star(s)

    is more than a piece of paper, its ?a piece of paper? that shows to the whole world and symbolises their love for each other and making the commitment of being married enables someone to ?spend the rest of their life with the person they love?.

  2. The Effects of Juvenile Delinquency on Modern Society.

    Every day and night a group of passion filled youth leaders take the gospel to the streets of Manchester ministering to the masses of young children who line the streets every night. These trained councillors interact with the youth everyone else ignores, involving them in community clubs and activities, relating

  1. In what ways does education effect social changes between one generation and the next?

    that education is thus "`a continuous effort to impose on the child ways of seeing, feeling and acting at which he would not have arrived spontaneously.'" Yet, various social groups or strata may have different beliefs. The parts of the educational system that are geared toward a particular group will

  2. How does 'Cranford' represent Victorian society in microcosm?

    In the first chapter, the narrator sets the scene clearly by going into great description about the 'rules and regulations' (p6) that have to be adhered to in Cranford. The calling hours, the length of time of a call, the time for bed, how the provision of anything expensive at the 'evening entertainments' (p8)

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    the only way the poor will escape poverty will be through their own political action and the clergy must play a role by expressing the discontent of the poor from the pulpit. Another example is Nazi Germany where priests opposed Hitler and South Africa where many of the clergy spoke out against Apartheid, led by Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

  2. Changing attitudes to marriage

    More and more couples cohabitate nowadays-they just live together without getting married. It used to be unacceptable and was called "living in sin", but now this disapproval has been weakened. Lots of cohabitating relationships do lead to marriage, so it's not rejected- it's delayed in most of the cases.

  1. How the film "Outsourced" shows the effects of culture shock on an American in ...

    They concern to others? life, share and help others in difficulty. Indian people think that asking others about their personal life shows friendly attitudes and helps people get closer. Todd is also surprised when he know that Indian people have habits to eat by their right-hand but not left-hand, and they like coffee with a lot of sugar.

  2. Families fail in the socialisation of children Evaluate the arguments for and against this ...

    learning their alphabet they could learn that its good to work hard and learn their alphabet and when they?re older they might know that working hard in school is a good thing and they might even be rewarded, because of the positive sanctions they received when younger.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work