But this version of the history (originated and constructed by the patriarchal structure) of women's movement in Bengal tells a completely different story when we look at it critically, from a male unbiased, feminist point of view

Authors Avatar

DEV 505: Gender and Development

Development Studies Program, BRAC University, Spring 2006

Response Paper 1

Feminism in Bangladesh: Southern Feminist Theories, Feminist Movements

Submitted to:

Prof. Ferdous Azim

Submitted By:

Kazi Nazrul Fattah

MDS, 6th Batch

ID - 05262005

According to the popular history of the women’s movement in Bengal – “the women of Bengal and Bangladesh have, throughout the history of the subcontinent, fought for their rights and many a learned man has also advocated gender equality and the rights of women in the region.”  Historical figures like Raja Rammohan Roy (1772-1833), Iswar Chandra Bidyashagar (1820-1891), Mohishi Debendranath Thakur are iconized as social reformers who have struggled untiringly for the rights of women, to stop the discrimination, to emancipate women from a position of being “a weak, helpless creature and a mere ornament and procreator of children to carry on the family name.” 

But this version of the history (originated and constructed by the patriarchal structure) of women’s movement in Bengal tells a completely different story when we look at it critically, from a male unbiased, feminist point of view. On one side we see that to the reformers like Raja Rammohan Roy, Iswar Chandra Bidyashagar or Mohishi Debendranath Thakur the key issue was modernization of material values and ideology (modernization according to the Europeans standard), the women’s issue came only as a part of this modernization issue. Improving women’s lot was only a part of a bigger question of incorporating modern, European values in their ideology and social life. Their work definitely brought many changes but none of them involved women’s participation in the movement – in fact there was no pro-active movement by the women. It was the patriarchy deciding what was good for women and what was not. On the other hand the popular history of women’s movement in Bengal is actually the untold story of their brave and courageous participation in movements not for women’s issues but solely focused on nationalist causes. Not only that women’s role in these movements are deliberately undermined and ignored, but also through nationalism women’s issues have been minimized by the patriarchal framework. As Partha Chatterjee points out nationalism had in fact resolved the ‘women’s question’, which was a central issue regarding social reform during the nineteenth century in Bengal, in complete accordance with its preferred goals.             

Join now!

Partha Chatterjee farther revealed how the private-public, material-spiritual, ghar-bahir division during the colonial period further crippled women, through a highly discriminated adoption of ‘modern’, ‘advanced’, European material values in the ideology of the nineteenth century patriarchal structure. Through this adoption while the material elements that empowered the westerners, i.e. science, technology, rational forms of economic organization, modern methods of statecraft were given to the male, women were assigned the role to uphold the traditional and spiritual values. In practice this was nothing different from the traditional patriarchy, in fact worse than ever it now confined the western knowledge, technology and ‘advanced ...

This is a preview of the whole essay