• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family Functionalists have a consensus approach and look at the family on a macro scale. They believe that all parts of the family interrelate and if one thing does not work, the whole family will become dysfunctional. In this way functionalists say the family is like an organic analogy - where everything in society depends on each other. The founder of functionalism is Emile Durkheim. When analysing the family, functionalists focus on two main areas. 1) the functions that the family provides and the 2) the functional relationship between the family and other social systems i.e. the economy. There are two main functionalists who both hold slightly different views on the functions of the family. Murdock conducted a study of 250 societies in different cultures in the 1940's. He concluded that there was some form of nuclear family - must include children, economic co-operation, adults of both sexes and same residence - in all 250 societies. He said that the family has four basic functions, which are; 1. ...read more.

Middle

The founder of Marxism is Karl Marx who based Marxism around capitalism and said that in order for the country to become communist, the proletariat (working class) would have to overthrow the bourgeoisie (ruling class). Unlike functionalists, Marxists do not agree with value consensus and the promise of meritocracy. From a Marxist point of view society operates largely for the benefit of the bourgeoisie. This makes the family a very pivotal institution and it forms part of the superstructure so is therefore responsible for passing on bourgeoisie norms, values and beliefs. Marxists say that the family purpose is to maintain the position of the bourgeoisie so it is like a prop for capitalism. Marxist, Engels, did a study in 1972. He believed that the monogamous nuclear family developed in order to ensure property inheritance was being passed on to the true heirs. Husbands needed more control over their wives so there would be not doubt over the paternity of their offspring. The monogamous family was the most efficient way for this purpose. Zaretsky, another Marxist conducted his study in 1976 and concluded that the family was the key ingredient for capitalism as the family consumes the products of capitalism which then enables the bourgeoisie to keep profits up and allows the capitalist system to continue. ...read more.

Conclusion

They do not see the relationships of some families i.e. Parsons' warm bath theory, as important as its place in keeping the bourgeoisies profits up. Where functionalism has been criticised for ignoring conflict within the family and assuming that family life is a safe haven for everyone. It can also be said that Marxists are too deterministic as they exaggerate the importance of the economic system on family structures. Although the two theories are very opposite to each other, as functionalism gives a positive view on the family and Marxism is quite negative about the family. Both are fairly dated considering the changes within the family and the rise of alternative types of household. An alternative perspective on the family that would criticise both Marxism and functionalism is feminism. Feminists would arguer that the two do not discuss the effects of family life on women. The feminist study looks at other areas of family life like domestic violence and housework. They also challenge traditional views of male dominance in the family. Feminism is a micro study as it focuses more on the affects families can have on women as individuals. ?? ?? ?? ?? Christina Oyediran H8 Sociology-D.I ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. This essay will compare two different sociological perspectives Marxism and Functionalism through society and ...

    Marxism seems to be a social utopia as a society without exploitation is not realistic whereas Functionalism is a too positive way to describe society, neglecting individual's needs and further influencing factors. Sport can obviously not only be seen through a Marxist's or Functionalist's view but it will benefit if

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    is necessary if society is to remain flexible and open to change." Crime brings together upright consciences and concentrates them."(4) The common values of the people underpin the whole complex system of the substructure of society it is vitally important for agreement and conformity for society to function correctly, thus the reason why the socialisation process is of vital importance.

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    In comparison Marxists see the role of religion quite differently; they favour the idea that religion is a form of social control. The traditional Marxist view is that religion exploits and oppresses individuals and in the idea society there would be no religion.

  2. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    well as somebody who perhaps had a lower class background, but had worked hard to achieve their qualifications and not bought their way in to academic achievement. So the idea of the hidden curriculum just doesn't seem to be able to support the theory that an educational system that is so prejudiced would be able to survive.

  1. Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Views on Society and Education.

    They see that pupils have their abilities and talents tested in schools so that they can be channelled into roles appropriate to their abilities and training, this is known as role allocation. Marxists would disagree with this and are interested in the way education works in the interests of the ruling class in a capitalist society.

  2. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    (Haralambos, 2005, page 218) Paterson's theory was based on the fundamental belief that society has been constructed through a consensus of values and norms, which is the essential element for the efficient functioning of society. With this proviso in mind, the immigrant-host model incorporates the stipulation that immigrants must gradually morph their culture into

  1. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    (The development of the Modern family Handout) The occupational system is impersonal which is in contrast to that of the family, which is based on love and close reciprocated affection. Parsons suggests that in order for these institutions to maintain a significant level of compatibility, there must be clear divisions between the two.

  2. With reference to the family, consider how functionalist perspective enhances understanding of the diversity ...

    Throughout the years our norms and values of everyday life have significantly changed; women are becoming more educated, which has resulted in them achieving higher status in their chosen careers, which means that they are no longer content to stay at home and do the household chores (Haralambos, 1990).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work