• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast functionalist and Marxist perspectives on the family Functionalists have a consensus approach and look at the family on a macro scale. They believe that all parts of the family interrelate and if one thing does not work, the whole family will become dysfunctional. In this way functionalists say the family is like an organic analogy - where everything in society depends on each other. The founder of functionalism is Emile Durkheim. When analysing the family, functionalists focus on two main areas. 1) the functions that the family provides and the 2) the functional relationship between the family and other social systems i.e. the economy. There are two main functionalists who both hold slightly different views on the functions of the family. Murdock conducted a study of 250 societies in different cultures in the 1940's. He concluded that there was some form of nuclear family - must include children, economic co-operation, adults of both sexes and same residence - in all 250 societies. He said that the family has four basic functions, which are; 1. ...read more.

Middle

The founder of Marxism is Karl Marx who based Marxism around capitalism and said that in order for the country to become communist, the proletariat (working class) would have to overthrow the bourgeoisie (ruling class). Unlike functionalists, Marxists do not agree with value consensus and the promise of meritocracy. From a Marxist point of view society operates largely for the benefit of the bourgeoisie. This makes the family a very pivotal institution and it forms part of the superstructure so is therefore responsible for passing on bourgeoisie norms, values and beliefs. Marxists say that the family purpose is to maintain the position of the bourgeoisie so it is like a prop for capitalism. Marxist, Engels, did a study in 1972. He believed that the monogamous nuclear family developed in order to ensure property inheritance was being passed on to the true heirs. Husbands needed more control over their wives so there would be not doubt over the paternity of their offspring. The monogamous family was the most efficient way for this purpose. Zaretsky, another Marxist conducted his study in 1976 and concluded that the family was the key ingredient for capitalism as the family consumes the products of capitalism which then enables the bourgeoisie to keep profits up and allows the capitalist system to continue. ...read more.

Conclusion

They do not see the relationships of some families i.e. Parsons' warm bath theory, as important as its place in keeping the bourgeoisies profits up. Where functionalism has been criticised for ignoring conflict within the family and assuming that family life is a safe haven for everyone. It can also be said that Marxists are too deterministic as they exaggerate the importance of the economic system on family structures. Although the two theories are very opposite to each other, as functionalism gives a positive view on the family and Marxism is quite negative about the family. Both are fairly dated considering the changes within the family and the rise of alternative types of household. An alternative perspective on the family that would criticise both Marxism and functionalism is feminism. Feminists would arguer that the two do not discuss the effects of family life on women. The feminist study looks at other areas of family life like domestic violence and housework. They also challenge traditional views of male dominance in the family. Feminism is a micro study as it focuses more on the affects families can have on women as individuals. ?? ?? ?? ?? Christina Oyediran H8 Sociology-D.I ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist explanations of the role of religion in ...

    Religion also makes people believe the suffering endured by oppression is a virtue. People believe they are rewarded for their pain and those that are rich and live luxurious lives are less likely to get into heaven. Religion offers hope that supernatural powers will intervene to solve problems, the anticipation makes life more bearable.

  2. "Compare and contrast the functionalist and Marxist competing views concerning the purpose of the ...

    This could range from something as simple as dressing differently, or possibly wearing ones hair in an outlandish way. Also people who commit crimes are known as deviants. Emile Durkheim saw crime as normal in terms of its occurrence in that no society could enforce total conformity, he argued deviance

  1. Outline Some Of The Key Tenets Of The Functionalist, Marxist and Interactionist Theories Of ...

    The interactionist theory looks at the interaction between students and teachers and also interaction amongst fellow peers. It looks at how these interactions may affect the performances of pupils in the educational system. Interactionist theory suggests that a teacher will type or categorise pupils as bright or troublesome, good or bad.

  2. Compare And Contrast Marxist and Functionalist Views on Society and Education.

    Functionalists believe that this will lead to social harmony, stability and social integration. Marxists believe that this is directly in line with the kind of worker required by employers in a capitalist society. The French Functionalist Emile Durkeim believes that the school is like a miniature version of society in

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    Having collected evidence regarding 'race issues' from a previous study she had conducted in South Africa, which Paterson believed illustrated a 'race situation', she was able to make the distinction between a 'race situation' and an 'immigrant situation'. For Patterson, a 'race situation' is moulded solely upon the obvious 'colour' divisions between different groups.

  2. With reference to the family, consider how functionalist perspective enhances understanding of the diversity ...

    The New Right Theorists think that people should try harder to achieve Murdock's ideal of the nuclear family; they associate welfare with the rise in divorce rates, the rise in teenage pregnancy, as well as the rise in lone parent families (Ballard, 1997).

  1. The purpose of this essay is to describe four studies relating to gender each ...

    (Parsons, 1949 pages 189-201) As such, these definite roles automatically disable the chance of competition between the male and female in the occupational system, which could subsequently create divisions or tension within the marriage. The nuclear family share the status and prestige, which derives from the male's occupational position and

  2. Using the factual accounts of the sinking of the Titanic, compare and contrast how ...

    Here the third class passengers are having a fantastic party, with dancing, and singing. Rose seems to be enjoying herself extremely as we also see her drinking pints of beer, which is a severe contrast to the expensive wine served from crystal classes, she has just had upstairs.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work