• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast two major theories of Social Inequality- Can Inequality be eliminated?

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast two major theories of Social Inequality- Can Inequality be eliminated? A major theory of inequality is the one propounded by Karl Marx who argues that social inequality is not natural but stems from the construction of the unfair capitalist system. Marx sees the workers or the proletariat as being exploited for their labour by those that own the means of production Marxists see social inequality as manifested in the fact that workers do not benefit from the wealth that their labour produces instead Marx claims that they are 1'pauperized'. The poorer working classes get poorer whilst the rich enjoy getting richer this is illustrated by income inequalities all over the world; the poorest 20% of people in the USA have seen their incomes fall by 19% whilst the top 5% saw their incomes rise, in Australia the richest ten per cent of the population owns about half the nation's wealth in the USA its over two thirds. A limitation of Marx theories on inequality is that it only focuses on economic inequality. Many sociologists would agree with Marx that economic inequality is the most significant form of inequality at the moment whilst acknowledging that economic inequality and social inequality, as we live in a modern multi- cultural capitalist country are inextricably linked and are affected significantly by gender, racial, religious and ethnic inequality. ...read more.


derived within their culture is 'devalued' and they therefore do not have equal opportunities to excel academically which of course restricts their employment choices and socio-economic position in the future. We can see therefore that inequality is institutionalised, as Marx alludes to in the labour market, and that education is perhaps the first agent of stratification. M. Tumin has also criticised Davis and Moore by condemning their notion of functional importance as questionable and too vague. It ignores the differential of power. According to Tumin differences in pay and prestige will be affected by, and often reflect differences in the relative power of groups and individuals in the labour market rather than the job's actual functional importance. Therefore differences in pay can actually be more a reflection of the relative strength of the workers' union and bargaining potential rather than of functional importance e.g. coal miners and farm labourers. Davis and Moore suggest that inequality is universal as it can be identified in all societies. Such views would suggest that inequality is not eliminable. Marxists ideas contradict this view. Marx claimed that inequality could be eliminated with the development of class consciousness and the abandonment of capitalism however the Soviet communism model proved that in the modern world this was untenable. Equality came at a high price- by the collapse of communism in 1989 equality had come to mean people simply had equally low living standards. ...read more.


Loury calls for4 'major structural remedies to speed up progress toward racial equality' which will in turn reduce the economic inequality that ethnic minority groups face. The New right perspective argues that social inequality has persisted throughout the ages; Saunders states that 'there has never been a completely egalitarian society'. Every society has its male and females, rich and poor it's big and small and it's old and young. In this absolute sense there is some truth to the assertion that some degree of inequality is inevitable. However inequality itself is unequal it varies with time and culture which validates the theory that inequality is socially constructed and thus can be eliminated. In Britain granted we have moved from the stark extremes of inequality of slavery in imperial Britain but only to an 'acceptable' economic and social inequality that is institutionalized within our capitalist system, unequal access is built into the structures that support and maintain our contemporary society. It can be argued that the current degree of inequality is not advantageous to society and a reflection of unequal talents in society as Davis and Moore claim nor is it an inevitable product of the capitalist system as Marxists argue; it is a matter of choice. Through the lax way we regulate corporations compared with the harsh regulations placed on workers unions, how we distribute the tax burden and how we set wages. We limit the power of workers thus limiting their socio-economic position. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    of the human race and we are living in a global economic world. Ultimately, all scientific studies must have a moral aspect and sociological study of the behaviour of society is no exception. Other explanations of stratification include Class Stratification; Karl Marx is probably the most famous person to argue about the effect of class in society.


    factories, farms, coal mines, raw materials etc., become a coherent group looking after their own interests" (http://www.hewett.norfolk.sch.uk/curric/soc/marx/mclass.htm) living in similar surroundings and sending children to similar school they formed the capitalist class. The Proletariat (working) class worked for the capitalist class for wages.

  1. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    The bourgeoisie is dependent on the proletariat for their labour for production and to receive capital and the proletariat was dependent on the bourgeoisie for wages. Capital is defined as money used to finance production of commodities for private gain.

  2. Gender Capital ? - Bourdieu and Gender Inequality

    The modern capitalist era had its' background in the ancient world which was illustrated by the master/slave relation, this evolved into the lord/serf relation of feudal society. The capitalist era was characterised by a capitalist/wage-labourer relation, with its' inherent system of exploitation.

  1. Briefly outline one major inequality which exists in the UK today. Analyse and discuss ...

    five education's is largely responsible for the socialisation of individuals and their expected role within wider society. Education for the 'masses' began when Britain required a literate nation to compete in the industrial revolution. Even during the early stages of teaching, gender differences in subject matter could be seen.

  2. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    Rational technology, to permit the required calculability. This implies mechanization. 4) Calculable law, the dependability of calculable adjudication and administration. 5) Free (not slave or serf) labor, people legally in the position to, and economically compelled to, sell their labor on the market without restriction.

  1. Compare and contrast the six main sociological theories of religion as well as examining ...

    What inventors and would-be manufacturers and industrialists needed most to develop their inventions and industries was capital fro investment. The Puritans had this and were inclined to lend their money for interest. They were prepared to do so because the new industries were not frivolous but would lead people to work hard.

  2. Is Delinquency a major factor in youth culture, what theory best explains delinquency?

    So, what Matza is trying to say is that delinquency is a normal, standard part of youth culture, but it is not a major part of youth culture, as the teenagers within the youth cultures are constantly shifting in-between delinquent and 'normal'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work