• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast two major theories of Social Inequality- Can Inequality be eliminated?

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast two major theories of Social Inequality- Can Inequality be eliminated? A major theory of inequality is the one propounded by Karl Marx who argues that social inequality is not natural but stems from the construction of the unfair capitalist system. Marx sees the workers or the proletariat as being exploited for their labour by those that own the means of production Marxists see social inequality as manifested in the fact that workers do not benefit from the wealth that their labour produces instead Marx claims that they are 1'pauperized'. The poorer working classes get poorer whilst the rich enjoy getting richer this is illustrated by income inequalities all over the world; the poorest 20% of people in the USA have seen their incomes fall by 19% whilst the top 5% saw their incomes rise, in Australia the richest ten per cent of the population owns about half the nation's wealth in the USA its over two thirds. A limitation of Marx theories on inequality is that it only focuses on economic inequality. Many sociologists would agree with Marx that economic inequality is the most significant form of inequality at the moment whilst acknowledging that economic inequality and social inequality, as we live in a modern multi- cultural capitalist country are inextricably linked and are affected significantly by gender, racial, religious and ethnic inequality. ...read more.


derived within their culture is 'devalued' and they therefore do not have equal opportunities to excel academically which of course restricts their employment choices and socio-economic position in the future. We can see therefore that inequality is institutionalised, as Marx alludes to in the labour market, and that education is perhaps the first agent of stratification. M. Tumin has also criticised Davis and Moore by condemning their notion of functional importance as questionable and too vague. It ignores the differential of power. According to Tumin differences in pay and prestige will be affected by, and often reflect differences in the relative power of groups and individuals in the labour market rather than the job's actual functional importance. Therefore differences in pay can actually be more a reflection of the relative strength of the workers' union and bargaining potential rather than of functional importance e.g. coal miners and farm labourers. Davis and Moore suggest that inequality is universal as it can be identified in all societies. Such views would suggest that inequality is not eliminable. Marxists ideas contradict this view. Marx claimed that inequality could be eliminated with the development of class consciousness and the abandonment of capitalism however the Soviet communism model proved that in the modern world this was untenable. Equality came at a high price- by the collapse of communism in 1989 equality had come to mean people simply had equally low living standards. ...read more.


Loury calls for4 'major structural remedies to speed up progress toward racial equality' which will in turn reduce the economic inequality that ethnic minority groups face. The New right perspective argues that social inequality has persisted throughout the ages; Saunders states that 'there has never been a completely egalitarian society'. Every society has its male and females, rich and poor it's big and small and it's old and young. In this absolute sense there is some truth to the assertion that some degree of inequality is inevitable. However inequality itself is unequal it varies with time and culture which validates the theory that inequality is socially constructed and thus can be eliminated. In Britain granted we have moved from the stark extremes of inequality of slavery in imperial Britain but only to an 'acceptable' economic and social inequality that is institutionalized within our capitalist system, unequal access is built into the structures that support and maintain our contemporary society. It can be argued that the current degree of inequality is not advantageous to society and a reflection of unequal talents in society as Davis and Moore claim nor is it an inevitable product of the capitalist system as Marxists argue; it is a matter of choice. Through the lax way we regulate corporations compared with the harsh regulations placed on workers unions, how we distribute the tax burden and how we set wages. We limit the power of workers thus limiting their socio-economic position. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. The Glass Ceiling

    She has also had male clients wish to speak with the "man in charge" instead of talking to her (Brzostowski). These are the types of men who put up the glass ceiling for women. They still carry prehistoric thoughts that women cannot be committed to a career because they belong

  2. Gender as a form of Social Stratification.

    According to many sociologists, the issue of inequality is crucial for stratification. I agree with this and I believe that the most important area within inequality is the historic racism imposed by White people upon non-white people. The reason it is so important is because non-white people make up three-quarters

  1. Gender Inequality.

    They argue that men are more aggressive than females; characteristics that they maintain are genetically based. These specific characteristics are largely influenced by the different male and female hormones and relate back to a time when man's primate ancestors had to adjust to a hunting way of life.

  2. Sociology - Social Inequality

    These two sub-classes had very diverse interests. For example, while the bourgeoisie aimed for ever increasing profits, the proletariat sought higher wages. Marx saw the bourgeoisie as exploiting the proletariat and this situation led to conflict between these classes. Functionalists see society as working in a harmonious way with each institution having a function to perform.


    As Human Rights have attempted to diminish the extensity of inequality, the traditional ideas stay firmly grounded that you stay in what you are born in until death, and cannot escape it. As we have taken a look at the way in which Caste systems work, we can now move on to explore class systems in modern day society.

  2. Compare and contrast the six main sociological theories of religion as well as examining ...

    Unlike Marx, they see religion as meeting universal human needs rather than those that stem from class inequality and exploitation. Furthermore they reject the view, shared by the classic sociologists of religion that the development of industrial capitalist societies would, one way or another, ultimately undermine religion.

  1. How Can Crime Be Related To Social Inequality? Discuss In Relation To Inequalities of ...

    This behaviour is more anti-social than female behaviour and can lead to delinquency. There are, of course, criticisms with the sex-role theories of crime. Explanations like these place an emphasis on social expectations, therefore are more concerned with what should be the case rather than reality.

  2. What are the major dimensions of social stratification?

    Whereas the functionalists and the new rights received many criticisms. They saw stratification as a integrative structure whereas Marxist and Weberians saw stratification as a more divisive system than integrative. However, they all saw stratification as inevitable. Marxists criticized Functionalists and New Rights because they saw stratification as a integrated system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work