• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically assess the concepts used by Emile Durkheim in his analysis of the social changes caused by rapid industrialization and modernization.

Extracts from this document...


Title: Critically assess the concepts used by Emile Durkheim in his analysis of the social changes caused by rapid industrialization and modernization. Distinguished himself from Marxist insistence on economic factor as the determinant of social change and Weber's famous view on the great influence of religion, Durkheim tries to explain social change by means of explaining the society itself apart from its individual members, through the analysis of the functional relationship between 'social facts'. By differentiating between social solidarity - one of the most important social fact that he is concerned with, Durkheim developed a series of theories to interpret the social change caused by industrialization and modernization. Durkheim's analysis of society is based on his view of social facts. Unlike his colleagues, he sees human society as an objectively existing entity preceding the individuals who comprise it. He believes that the behaviours of each individual do not evolve from one's desire, rather, these behaviours are lead by the social system. In his opinion, 'Members of society are constrained by 'social facts', by 'ways of acting, thinking and feeling, external to the individual, and endowed with a power of coercion, by reason of which they control him'. ...read more.


And such solidarity is still spacious enough to allow for further division between individual conscience and collective conscience. However, the collective conscience is still the essence to maintain the social unity and can not be neglected. Nevertheless Durkheim also perceived the potential instability of this type of solidarity caused by the substance of division of labour from the view of human nature. His 'homo duplex' model interprets the fact with the self-interest behind an individual's behaviour. And when this side of human nature predominates, it will seriously affect one's ability to accept the collective conscience. Consequentially, self-interest will become the sole guideline of social life and the disintegration of the society will take place. For Durkheim, this collapse of a society is an extreme case of 'Anomie', the term he used to describe the society under normlessness. According to him, anomie will occur when the rapid social change seriously disrupt the existing moral regulation and common conscience while the new social order is yet to be formulated. Norms will be questioned and the level of individual's life desire will be confused. This disruption therefore will encourage the dependence on self-interest, thus reducing the degree of social integration. ...read more.


On the other side, Ferdinand Tonnies also rejected Durkheim's analysis of social solidarity, seeing that solidarity is disintegrating during the transition from Gemeinschaft (community) to Gesellschaft (societal) (Grint, 1998, p95). However, illustrated with the situation in modern China, many of Durkheim's theories should still be seriously considered especially when analysing the changes of human society. As a virtual functionalist, Emile Durkheim produced series of concepts based on his unique interpretation on 'social facts'. He concentrates himself on the analysis of social solidarity by explaining how it changed by the development of division of labour and showing its importance of integration of a society. He also expounds the situation in which social solidarity might break down and termed 'anomie' to define such scenarios. His concepts have proven themselves to be still up to date and valuable by providing a reasonable explanation to the current situation in the Chinese society. Reference Haralambos, M. Holborn, M. (2000) Sociology, Themes and Perspectives 5th ed. England, Collins Educational Publisher, London, the United Kingdom Morrison, K. (2000) Marx Durkheim Weber, SAGE Publications Ltd., London, the United Kingdom Observer Report: China's Industrialization to Take 20 Years: Academician, People's Daily, 28th Oct. 2002, Beijing, China Durkheim, E. Moral Education, The Free Press, Glencoe Grint, K (1998) The Sociology of Work 2nd ed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. In what ways does education effect social changes between one generation and the next?

    Integration - socialisation of individuals to accept the norms and control them if they don't - schools, churches, media, police and judicial system. Therefore, Parsons sees education as serving a part in the function of integration. Through education individuals are socialised to conform.

  2. Discuss the key concepts within, and state the similarities and differences between, the following ...

    However in the full realisation of his theory, Marx saw the 'final epoch of history', [Haralambos & Holborn 6 th ed. Pxvi; Contradiction & Change.] that is the communist or socialist society that would eventually and inevitably replace capitalism, as developing from a resolution of the contradictions contained within the

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Deception is involved. * Not wanting to harm anyone else. * The teacher thinking he could be possibly capable of killing someone. * Is it morally right to lie to someone for the purpose of an expt. * Teacher would be under physical and mental stress.

  2. The following essay will use the ideas of Durkheim to construct my social biography ...

    advantages of modern freedom, he warned of the negative effect of anomie. To social solidarity, there are some threats. Durkheim thought in industrial societies, egoism or anomie could undermine the control over individuals. Anomie, which means normlessness, was believed to be produced by the specialized division of labor and rapid industrialization.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    If you can't make this relation (for example a hindering or favorable circumstance) it's not meaningful in the sense we care about. There are 2 kinds of understanding: 1) direct observational understanding of subjective mean of a given act (eg, if i start to shout at you, you could directly observe my irrational emotional reaction by virtue of my shouting).

  2. Critically examine the analysis by Durkheim of the threats to social solidarity posed by ...

    (Lecture 3 notes).3 For such a society, all the things are seemed on the right track. When this solidarity exercises its forces, personality vanishes. Its symbol is conscience collective, which emphasising that mechanical solidarity was both a moral and a rational outlook.

  1. This essay will explain the functionalist, Marxist and Social action theories of race and ...

    However, the Irish, it could be argued, might find it substantially easier to become absorbed into the British population. In this instance skin colour could be a significant factor in 'race relations', as there are less noticeable differences - especially from the next generation, who's accent would have become diluted.

  2. The Cherry Orchard is pessimistic in its analysis of social transition.

    peasant" to differentiate that she is aristocracy and he is nothing more than a peasant and what he takes as a term of endearment is actually an underlying condescension (Chekhov, 2). Her kindness is only that of a noblewoman to a peasant; nothing more.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work