• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate Weber's contention that class, status and party are distinct entities and cannot be resolved under the single concept of class.

Extracts from this document...


Critically evaluate Weber's contention that class, status and party are distinct entities and cannot be resolved under the single concept of class. Weber developed a different approach to the study of social groups and classes than did Marx. According to Marx, there are two primary classes in society: bourgeoisie and proletariat. Marx considers these classes to be defined and determined by whether they own the means of production. Weber agreed with certain fundamental aspects of Marx thought. For Weber, ownership and non-ownership of property was a basic fact in the determination of a class. But there are some significant differences between Weber and Marx. Weber saw class in terms of "market situation". He defined a class that a group of individuals who share a similar position in a market economy and therefore share a similar life-chance in the labour market, including receives similar economic rewards. In contrast to Marx, however, Weber added to the economic dimension of stratification two other dimensions, power (party) and social honor. Property differences generate classes, power differences generate parties; and social honor differences generate status. Class, status and party are there distinct entities for Weber. Weber distinguished four class groupings in capitalist society: the propertied upper class; the propertyless white-collar workers; the petty bourgeoisie and the manual working class. ...read more.


And different lifestyles have different degree of social honor. Status groups are stratified according to the principles of their consumption of goods as represented by lifestyle. Status groups are usually associated with some restrictions on social intercourse or interaction. That is, there is some degree of closure to outsiders, and the status group exercises some degree of management of relationships of those within the group. Social closure involves the exclusion of some people from membership of a status group. Occupational groups who enjoy certain group-related advantages-such as high incomes, educational advantage and so on-using their resources to sustain their relatively privileged position and exclude others from it. In the higher-status groups there is a considerable degree of self-recruitment. This is a process by which members of a stratum are recruited from the sons of those who already belong to that stratum. Elite self-recruitment involves the economic and culture resources that status groups use to pass their privileges on to their children. Many members of elites attended public schools and went to Oxford or Cambridge University. There are fairly high correlations between standing in the class and in the status order. In capitalist society, the propertied class also acquires high status and in principle propertied and propertyless people may belong to the same status group. ...read more.


So according to Weber, the relationship between party and class and status groups is far from clearcut. In conclusion, there are several differences between Weber and Marx. Marx saw capitalist society as divided into two classes: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. He argued that men in differnet relations to the means of production naturally have opposed interests. Class is based on ownership and non-ownership for Marx. In conrast to Marx, Weber defined class in terms of market situation. He saw important differences in the market situation of the property less groups. The various skills and services offered by different occupations have different market value. Weber saw a diversification of classes rather than polarization which is held by Marx. He also suggests that disatisfied among the property-less groups can be based on rational motives, and not false consciousness. According to Weber, classes are based on market stuation, status groups refer to social honor, and parties in the sphere of power. So for Weber, class, status and party are distinct entities and cannot be resolved under the single concept of class. Refrences Haralambos and Holborn, 2000, Themes and Perspectives, fifth edition, Published by Harpercollins Publishers Limitied, London Melvin M. Tumin, 1967, Social Stratification, Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Hersey R. K. Kelsall, Helen M. Kelsall, 1974, Stratification, General edition, Longman Group Limited, London Tony Bilton, Kevin Bonnett, Introductory Sociology, The Macmillan press LTD, London Sociology Theory www.src.uchicago.edu/ssrl/PRELIMS/Theory/weber.html Multiple Sources of Power-Class, Status, and Party www.uregina.ca/~gingrich/o2302.htm Weber-The Work-Class,status, and Power www2.pfeiffer.edu/~lridener/DSS/Weber/WEBERW7.HTML ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Karl Marx and Max Weber have different views upon social class in contemporary societies.

    Power, including economic power, may be valued 'for its own sake.' Very frequently the striving for power is also conditioned by the social 'honor' it entails.'(Holton, 1989) Parties may be rooted in either class or status interests, or neither. Most parties are mixed up between class and status groups, just like class and status groups divide each other.

  2. Comparisons and contrasts between the theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber on social ...

    Even to this day there is a problem surrounding how Marxism should define classes (Giddens, 1997: 244). From Marx himself we get the idea that classes can be understood as clusters or groups of individuals having the same relationship with the process of (economic)

  1. Compare and contrast two of the perspectives - Marx & Weber

    These ranks are formed from the struggle for economic resources as well as prestige and political power. He believed that people should compete to gain advantage of these resources and that each class is defined by the resources or rewards that they receive.

  2. Compare and contrast Karl Marx's and Michel Foucault's analysis of the concept power.

    Foucault traced the way in which punishment was carried out up until the Renaissance period through the classical and Modern age where he highlights the difference between how power is exercised. If the King's subjects acted against him, the infamy of his crime had to be 'written', so to speak, on his body.

  1. I will examine the social class theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber, and ...

    So the celebrities, while having as Weber suggests, some of the attributes of the upper class, also lack some of the other elements of the Marxist traditional upper class, such as the political power of owning the traditional means of production Celebrities, when seen from a Marxist perspective, can be said to be in two classes at the same time.

  2. The Emergence of the Working Class through The Industrial Revolution, 1750-1914, in Europe, UK ...

    These governing concepts further separated owner from employee and brought conflict between the two groups. The workers began to feel that they were loosing control over their work as they were being strictly managed, the feeling of class-consciousness began to emerge.

  1. Max Weber: Basic Terms (The Fundamental Concepts of Sociology)

    in a given type of action (like an ideal type). The line between meaningful action and reactive behavior w/o subjective meaning is blurry. The basis for understanding meaning may be either rational (logical or mathematical -- clear intellectual grasp of things)

  2. Social Class.

    The Black Report is the first to report the evidence of relationship between an individual's social classes and likelihood of lower class experiencing ill health than people from upper class. The Report disclosed further that the gap in mortality rates between the rich and poor had actually increased between 1930 and 1970.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work