• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the assertion that World Wars one and two were the most important agents of social change in twentieth century Britain.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the assertion that World Wars one and two were the most important agents of social change in twentieth century Britain. British society in the twentieth century underwent many changes and World War one and two undoubtedly played a crucial part in many of them. Changes had occurred in social policy that affected all society before the First World War, however in the twentieth century the effects of both wars were crucial to social change. When looking at the evidence it seems the effects of both wars dramatically speeded up the process of social change in Britain due to social, political and economic conditions. This social change then was concerning legislation and in turn, state welfare provision, health and education, which will be explored here. To understand fully and to what extent World Wars One and Two were the driving force for social change in the twentieth century, an understanding of social policy and legislation in Britain before the First World War and the twentieth century is necessary. Before the twentieth century changes in welfare had already begun to occur. For example industrialisation, 'The economic growth following the application of inanimate sources of power to mechanise production' (Abercrombie, 1988: 123) ...read more.

Middle

World War Two had a much force on social change than World War One did (Fulcher and Scott, 2003). For example through shared experiences such as rationing, evacuation of children from cities, conscription of all men and women and excess profits tax, things that brought people together resulting in higher expectations after the war. For Titmuss the British government during the World War Two demonstrated: 'Direct concern for the health and well-being of the population which, by contrast with the role of the Government in the nineteen-thirties, was a little short of remarkable.' (Titmuss cited in Jones, 2000: 104) Government was concerned with social tension and suffering and values as values changes citizens stuck together easing gaps between social classes. Classes merged as 'common experience of privatisation and danger' (Jones, 2000: 104) brought people together as the public shared 'devastating experiences' (Jones, 2000: 104) Also 'Wartime shortages led to many extensions in social services.' (Jones: 106) for example meals for children and childcare, and because of these affects of the war, afterwards people expected these to continue, if not improve. After the Second World War a welfare state was called for. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the post-war years there was a feeling of consensus from the British government and academics saw that social reform was needed through state intervention (Alcock, 1996). Both Beveridge and Keynes agreed that the government should intervene to make way for economic growth, employment and welfare (Alcock et al 2004). Also in terms of social attitudes people expected more from the new policies regarding equality. As a result of the Second World War Williams explains: 'Civilisation of a new order - of social justice and egalitarianism - an order that could replace the imperial ideal in sustaining cohesion.' (Williams, 2003:150) She claims that civilisation was of great importance in the post-war period and that the newly established rights and benefits should have been available to all. World Wars One and Two were extremely important in influencing social change in twentieth century Britain. Though some breakthrough laws such as the Children's Act and National Insurance Act were established before both wars, it was the change in legislation as a result of both wars that was the most significant in terms of social change. In conclusion these changes and developments in social policies for example the Beveridge Report explored here, were invaluable when analysing social change in twentieth century society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. COMPARATIVE SOCIAL WELFARE

    which conceptions of 'citizenship have become increasingly bound up with 'duty' to take up offers of employment or training from the state. Here the stress is on individual responsibility to participate as an active citizen by ensuring he/she has an adequate provision for retirement etc as opposed to the more

  2. Primary Sources and Social Change in the industrial revolution

    We have hard work to live as it is. ...My husband is of the same mind about it...last summer my husband was 6 weeks ill; we pledged almost all our things to live; the things are not all out of pawn yet. ...We complain of nothing but short wages...My children have been in the mill three years.

  1. What effects did World War One have on social classes?

    (Unit 7-10 page 95). Both authors are giving us their idea of prewar society by stating, in Maier's case, that a 'bourgeoisie' society was maintained, and in the case of Mayer that aristocratic society held onto its powerbase. I personally support the view that the aristocratic landowners still had the

  2. Media, leisure & fashion - Britain in the 1930's.

    'Talkies' allowed for a great variety of films including, romances, historical epics, melodramas, comedies, musical extravaganzas and many more, for example Bringing up Baby, Mr Deeds goes to town, Snow White and Gone with the Wind, these appealed to a great range of people to appeal to all.

  1. Historical Interpretation of Economic-Social Change

    the Industrial Revolution prove that free competition may produce wealth with well-being. We all know the horrors that ensued in England before it was restrained by legislation and combination." (A. Toynbee (1884) Lectures of the Industrial Revolution) Toynbee is writing later than Engels and takes into account the benefits from the reforms in the middle of the nineteenth century.

  2. Have (or how have) representations of the ethnic or national 'other' changed in post-war ...

    (Sarup, p.6) However, this appears to reject Sarup's point that identity is limited by borders and boundaries because from an essentialist standpoint identities are seen as constantly fixed. Furthermore, Sarup uses Baumans ideas to illustrate that powerful dichotomies are used to categorise and split society, therefore the migrant who is seen as the foreigner or stranger is an 'undecidable, unclassifiable' (Sarup, p.10).

  1. Social Security Policy.

    This in itself demonstrates the lack of respect for the elderly, and the fuels the argument that once someone passes working age, they are no longer deemed an integral part of society, and are pushed out of mainstream society. This essay aims to look at the provisions in place for

  2. "Methodism, the most astonishing eruption in the eighteenth century history of religion, was an ...

    Loss of influence in the upper echelons of power, with monarchs of differing faith on the throne and the abbots losing their majority in the Lords was coupled with strain on authority in the parishes through lack of adequate funding or dynamism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work