• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the assertion that World Wars one and two were the most important agents of social change in twentieth century Britain.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the assertion that World Wars one and two were the most important agents of social change in twentieth century Britain. British society in the twentieth century underwent many changes and World War one and two undoubtedly played a crucial part in many of them. Changes had occurred in social policy that affected all society before the First World War, however in the twentieth century the effects of both wars were crucial to social change. When looking at the evidence it seems the effects of both wars dramatically speeded up the process of social change in Britain due to social, political and economic conditions. This social change then was concerning legislation and in turn, state welfare provision, health and education, which will be explored here. To understand fully and to what extent World Wars One and Two were the driving force for social change in the twentieth century, an understanding of social policy and legislation in Britain before the First World War and the twentieth century is necessary. Before the twentieth century changes in welfare had already begun to occur. For example industrialisation, 'The economic growth following the application of inanimate sources of power to mechanise production' (Abercrombie, 1988: 123) ...read more.

Middle

World War Two had a much force on social change than World War One did (Fulcher and Scott, 2003). For example through shared experiences such as rationing, evacuation of children from cities, conscription of all men and women and excess profits tax, things that brought people together resulting in higher expectations after the war. For Titmuss the British government during the World War Two demonstrated: 'Direct concern for the health and well-being of the population which, by contrast with the role of the Government in the nineteen-thirties, was a little short of remarkable.' (Titmuss cited in Jones, 2000: 104) Government was concerned with social tension and suffering and values as values changes citizens stuck together easing gaps between social classes. Classes merged as 'common experience of privatisation and danger' (Jones, 2000: 104) brought people together as the public shared 'devastating experiences' (Jones, 2000: 104) Also 'Wartime shortages led to many extensions in social services.' (Jones: 106) for example meals for children and childcare, and because of these affects of the war, afterwards people expected these to continue, if not improve. After the Second World War a welfare state was called for. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the post-war years there was a feeling of consensus from the British government and academics saw that social reform was needed through state intervention (Alcock, 1996). Both Beveridge and Keynes agreed that the government should intervene to make way for economic growth, employment and welfare (Alcock et al 2004). Also in terms of social attitudes people expected more from the new policies regarding equality. As a result of the Second World War Williams explains: 'Civilisation of a new order - of social justice and egalitarianism - an order that could replace the imperial ideal in sustaining cohesion.' (Williams, 2003:150) She claims that civilisation was of great importance in the post-war period and that the newly established rights and benefits should have been available to all. World Wars One and Two were extremely important in influencing social change in twentieth century Britain. Though some breakthrough laws such as the Children's Act and National Insurance Act were established before both wars, it was the change in legislation as a result of both wars that was the most significant in terms of social change. In conclusion these changes and developments in social policies for example the Beveridge Report explored here, were invaluable when analysing social change in twentieth century society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. Primary Sources and Social Change in the industrial revolution

    I have no complaint to make of their being beaten...I would rather they were beaten than fined." (Factory Inquiry Commission, Great Britain, Parliamentary Papers, 1833). Mrs Smith is dependant on being give long hours in the factory for the survival of her family, she needs the income of the children.

  2. COMPARATIVE SOCIAL WELFARE

    The political, economic and social changes have forced the present New Blair Government to rethink of the term 'citizenship' rather than just looking at poverty and access to social rights (the traditional basis of the post war welfare state) but also as entailing the performance of certain social duties/responsibilities, in

  1. As the nineteenth century opened, life presented few opportunities for women to experience personal ...

    Another common trait: The heroines met with tragedy. As seen earlier the men writing in the nineteenth century saw their female characters as "types," and this continued to be true for authors like Henry James and Stephen Crane. According to Judith Fryer, the "American Princess" type is presented in the classic Daisy Miller by Henry James.

  2. Social Security Policy.

    differing approaches to social structure and social policy from a Marxist perspective. In general many agreed that the achievement of the welfare state in Britain was neither as desirable nor as successful as had been assumed. Marxists argued that the welfare state had not been successful in solving the social

  1. To what extent was eugenic science implemented in state medical and health polices during ...

    The later years of the nineteenth century were characterised by increasing levels of intervention in health care by the state, this intervention was backed up by the science of the time3. Eugenics was one science that influenced health policy at this time.

  2. Humans are... what, in Dick's narrative? Phillip K. Dick's sci-fi classic delves into ...

    However, throughout the course of the novel there is a gradual role reversal between the two individuals. It can thus be seen as a whole, that the portrayal of humans, specials and androids do not fit in with their original levels of humanity.

  1. To what extent and why would you agree or disagree with the view that ...

    New Right thinkers emphasise individualism; Friedman asserts that '. The individual (is) the ultimate entity in society '. Clearly, there is little room for collective conscious in their philosophy. This egotistical individualism stresses that the welfare state, a collectivist policy, cannot work due to 'human nature' e.g. self-seeking and greedy.

  2. Explain the differing reactions of people in Britain to the policy of Evacuating children ...

    Source 2 also says how some children were happy "Others were quite happy, especially when the time came for them to part from their mothers." A few children burst into tears crying for their mothers. When the small working class children got settled into their new homes they would still

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work