• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the difference between Quantitative and Qualitative research methods.

Extracts from this document...


Louise Riddell - 0014332 SO113 - Social Research Methods and Study Skills RESIT REASSESSMENT COURSEWORK Discuss the difference between Quantitative and Qualitative research methods. Social research methods can be divided into two main branches or schools quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative research involves measuring quantities of things, usually numerical quantities. Qualitative research involves assessing the quality of things. These research methods used by sociologists in data gathering. Both methods have their limitations and differences. Quantitative research methods are concerned with empirical research, this is designed for statistical analysis. Qualitative research methods on the other hand are not. Instead they enable researchers to study social and cultural phenomena. All research whether quantitative or qualitative are based on assumptions about what can be considered as "valid" research, and what research methods are deemed appropriate. When wanting to find out about, how people may vote then quantitative methods such as a social survey may be deemed an appropriate choice. ...read more.


"Qualitative researchers still largely feel themselves to be second-class citizens whose work typically evokes suspicion, where the 'gold standard' is quantitative research." (Silverman, 2000.) To help explain why quantitative research is seen as the 'gold standard', I will describe the methods in more detail. There are five main methods of quantitative research. These are social survey, experiment, official statistics, "structured observation" and content analysis. A good example would be a survey of father and son's occupations. The independent variable being the father's occupation and the son's being the dependant. This is because the father is the possible cause of the sons. The results of such a study would be shown in a table of findings. The survey could look at manual and non-manual workers, and random sample of 100 people would probably be used, depending on the researcher. This would be so the researcher could be confident within specifiable limits that any correlation is probably not a chance finding. ...read more.


A number of quantitative practices are seen as inappropriate by qualitative researchers. The idea that social science research can only be valid if based on experimental data, official statistics, random sampling. Those who criticize quantitative research, argue that these assumptions have a number of defects. They believe the techniques mentioned earlier like random sampling and experiments are sometimes inappropriate. They do not take into account behaviour in everyday situations for instance. Quantification can be useful but conceals basic social processes. A good example would be when counting attitudes in a survey. People do not always have coherent attitudes to the topic being researched. Another point is that we have adopted an attitude but behave differently in practice! Statistics simply cannot measure all areas of social reality. Methods used by qualitative researchers are an example of the belief they can provide a "deeper" understanding of social phenomena than from quantitative data on its own! There is no agreed doctrine for qualitative research. There are many branches, these include feminism, postmodernism, and ethnomedology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Sociology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Sociology essays

  1. A-Level Sociology Theory + Methods Revision.

    Lemert - Primary D = deviance before it is publicly labelled - not worth investigating as samples are biased + it has no impact on the person's actions or activities. He claims, the common factor among deviants is the process of labelling - the public reaction to the deviant leads to 2ndry dev.

  2. evaluation of methods

    So their results will depend on each others, therefore this will affect the precision of my results. However, the most useful observation about my method was my pilot study. I had many problems with my pilot study, including; some of them did not understand the questions clearly, some misunderstood the

  1. usefulness of quantitative and qualitative sources of data in studying suicide

    Another coroner might want more conclusive evidence - for e.g. a suicide note. Statistics are valid if they represent a true and accurate measurement. Coroners have to decide whether a death is suicide, an accident, or due to natural causes.

  2. Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of qualitative research.

    They can help to develop vocabularies and methods for communicating information to target audiences. In addition there are numerous other strong points towards using qualitative research methods. Firstly it provides more in-depth and comprehensive information so that any information that is received from using this method is quite detailed and useful.

  1. Gender difference

    For example, boys can be labelled as underachievers and unintelligent. This could lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy; if a teacher labels a student with a negative attribute the student is likely to feel discouraged to work hard, therefore fulfilling the prophecy.

  2. Describe discuss and evaluate the research methodologies you used to investigate your question

    are an excellent resource as they offer reliable, academic input with usually unbiased views and journalist ethics. I found www.mediaguardian.com very useful. I knew the Guardian would be one of the best newspaper sources, as it is known for its credibility and reliability.

  1. McNeill, P (1990) Research Methods, Routledge, and Bryman, A (2001) Social Research Methods, Oxford ...

    is being written and also feeling comfortable and confident enough to carry on. It is liked that McNeill has made reading the book interactive by giving the reader a number of 'activities' to complete at the end of each chapter.

  2. Philosophies of Social Science.

    But the new world was perilous and unstable. What could be done to secure both progress and order? Comte's answer was to advocate a new 'science of society' - sociology. This 'queen of the sciences' would involve a study of 'society' as an entity that was more than the sum of its individual members.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work